Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 41
  • /
  • Pages.23.1-23.10
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications

  • Kwon, Tae-Geon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Han, Michael D. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago)
  • Received : 2019.04.09
  • Accepted : 2019.04.22
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The choice of surgical technique in orthognathic surgery is based primarily on the surgical treatment objectives (STO), which is a fundamental component of the orthognathic treatment process. In the conventional orthodontics-first approach, presurgical planning can be performed twice, during the preorthodontic (initial STO) and presurgical phases (final STO). Recently, a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) without presurgical orthodontic treatment has been introduced and combined initial and final STO at the same time. In contrast to the conventional surgical-orthodontic treatment protocol that includes preoperative orthodontics for dental decompensations to maximize stable postoperative occlusion, the SFA potentially shortens the treatment period and minimizes esthetic concerns during the decompensation period because skeletal problems are corrected from the beginning. The indications for the SFA have been proposed in the literature, but no consensus exists. Moreover, because dental occlusion of the pre-orthodontic arches cannot be used as a guide for establishing the surgical treatment plan, there are fundamental limitations in accurate prediction of postsurgical results in the SFA. Recently, the concepts of postsurgical orthodontic treatment are continuously changing and evolving to overcome this inherent limitation of the SFA. The elimination of presurgical orthodontics can change the paradigm of orthognathic surgery but still requires cautious case selection and thorough discussion and collaboration between orthodontists and surgeons regarding the goals and postoperative management of the orthognathic procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R (2009) "Surgery first" skeletal Class III correction using the Skeletal Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod 43:97-105
  2. Pelo S, Gasparini G, Garagiola U, Cordaro M, Di Nardo F, Staderini E et al (2017) Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs traditional orthognathic approach: oral health-related quality of life assessed with 2 questionnaires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 152:250-254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.022
  3. Zingler S, Hakim E, Finke D, Brunner M, Saure D, Hoffmann J et al (2017) Surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: psychological and biological aspects - a prospective cohort study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45:1293-1301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.031
  4. Uribe F, Agarwal S, Shafer D, Nanda R (2015) Increasing orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment efficiency with a modified surgery-first approach. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 148:838-848 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.038
  5. Park JK, Choi JY, Yang IH, Baek SH (2015) Patient's satisfaction in skeletal class III cases treated with two-jaw surgery using orthognathic quality of life questionnaire: conventional three-stage method versus surgery-first approach. J Craniofac Surg 26:2086-2093 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001972
  6. Wang J, Chen W, Ni Z, Zheng M, Liang X, Zheng Y et al (2017) Timing of orthognathic surgery on the changes of oral health-related quality of life in Chinese orthognathic surgery patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 151:565-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.050
  7. Jeong WS, Choi JW, Kim DY, Lee JY, Kwon SM (2017) Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:473-482 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.006
  8. Sharma VK, Yadav K, Tandon P (2015) An overview of surgery-first approach: recent advances in orthognathic surgery. J Orthod Sci 4:9-12 https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149609
  9. Peiro-Guijarro MA, Guijarro-Martinez R, Hernandez-Alfaro F (2016) Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 149:448-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.022
  10. Yang L, Xiao YD, Liang YJ, Wang X, Li JY, Liao GQ (2017) Does the surgeryfirst approach produce better outcomes in orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75:2422-2429 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.002
  11. Jeon JH (2017) Timing of orthognathic surgery: paradigm shift by surgeryfirst approach? J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:61-62 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.61
  12. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martinez R (2014) On a definition of the appropriate timing for surgical intervention in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:846-855 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.007
  13. Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Wang X, Li Z (2016) Minimal presurgical orthodontics for a skeletal Class III patient with mandibular asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 149:99-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.039
  14. Choi TH, Kim SH, Yun PY, Kim YK, Lee NK (2019) Factors related to relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.030. Epub ahead of print
  15. Lee YS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Larson BE, Lee NK (2016) Comparison of the stability after mandibular setback with minimal orthodontics of class III patients with different facial types. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1464 e1461-1464 e1410 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.007
  16. Lee JY, Kim YK, Yun PY, Lee NK, Kim JW, Choi JH (2014) Evaluation of stability after orthognathic surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation: comparison according to 3 types of fixation. J Craniofac Surg 25:911-915 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609
  17. Kim JW, Lee NK, Yun PY, Moon SW, Kim YK (2013) Postsurgical stability after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation following upper premolar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1968 e1961-1968 e1911 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.004
  18. Ko EW, Hsu SS, Hsieh HY, Wang YC, Huang CS, Chen YR (2011) Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1469-1477 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022
  19. Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Yu CC, Huang CS, Chen YR (2011) Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:771-780 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011
  20. Kim JH, Park YC, Yu HS, Kim MK, Kang SH, Choi YJ (2017) Accuracy of 3- dimensional virtual surgical simulation combined with digital teeth alignment: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75(11):2441.e1-2441.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.161
  21. Holzinger D, Willinger K, Millesi G, Schicho K, Breuss E, Wagner F et al (2019) Changes of temporomandibular joint position after surgery first orthognathic treatment concept. Sci Rep 9(1):2206 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38786-2
  22. Baik HS, Kim SY (2010) Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:167-178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.022
  23. Huang CS, Hsu SS, Chen YR (2014) Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery. Biom J 37:184-190 https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.126863
  24. Baek SH, Ahn HW, Kwon YH, Choi JY (2010) Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg 21:332-338 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4
  25. Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Yu CC, Huang CS, Chen YR (2011) Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:781-785 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035
  26. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Nieto MJ, Ruiz-Magaz V, Valls-Ontanon A, Mendez-Manjon I, Guijarro-Martinez R (2017) Inferior subapical osteotomy for dentoalveolar decompensation of class III malocclusion in 'surgery-first' and 'surgery-early' orthognathic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:80-85
  27. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martinez R, Peiro-Guijarro MA (2014) Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: what have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:376-390 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.013
  28. Uribe F, Chugh VK, Janakiraman N, Feldman J, Shafer D, Nanda R (2013) Treatment of severe facial asymmetry using virtual three-dimensional planning and a "surgery first" protocol. J Clin Orthod 47:471-484
  29. Watanabe Y, Sasaki R, Matsuno I, Akizuki T (2019) Surgery-first orthognathic surgery for severe facial asymmetry combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis using a three-dimensional internal distractor. J Craniofac Surg 30:39-46 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004929
  30. Jeong WS, Lee JY, Choi JW (2017) Large-scale study of long-term anteroposterior stability in a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg 28:2016-2020 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003853
  31. Oh JY, Park JW, Baek SH (2012) Surgery-first approach in class III open-bite. J Craniofac Surg 23:e283-e287 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825055b1
  32. Huang CS, Chen YR (2015) Orthodontic principles and guidelines for the surgery-first approach to orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:1457-1462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.05.023
  33. Park KH, Sandor GK, Kim YD (2016) Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion, using standardized criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.015
  34. Soverina D, Gasparini G, Pelo S, Doneddu P, Todaro M, Boniello R et al (2019) Skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery with the surgery first approach: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.002 2019. Jan 23 [Epub ahead of print]
  35. Han JJ, Jung S, Park HJ, Oh HK, Kook MS (2019) Evaluation of postoperative mandibular positional changes after mandibular setback surgery in a surgery-first approach: isolated mandibular surgery versus bimaxillary surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77:181 e181-181 e112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.008
  36. Lee NK, Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim JW (2013) Evaluation of post-surgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.010
  37. Kim CS, Lee SC, Kyung HM, Park HS, Kwon TG (2014) Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:779-787 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033
  38. Park HM, Yang IH, Choi JY, Lee JH, Kim MJ, Baek SH (2015) Postsurgical relapse in class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery: conventional threestage method versus surgery-first approach. J Craniofac Surg 26:2357-2363 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001989
  39. Wang YC, Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR, Takano-Yamamoto T (2010) Comparison of transverse dimensional changes in surgical skeletal Class III patients with and without presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1807-1812 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.089
  40. Frost HM (1983) The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 31:3-9
  41. Akesson K, Kakonen SM, Josefsson PO, Karlsson MK, Obrant KJ, Pettersson K (2005) Fracture-induced changes in bone turnover: a potential confounder in the use of biochemical markers in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 23:30-35
  42. Stoffel K, Engler H, Kuster M, Riesen W (2007) Changes in biochemical markers after lower limb fractures. Clin Chem 53:131-134 https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.076976
  43. Mueller M, Schilling T, Minne HW, Ziegler R (1991) A systemic acceleratory phenomenon (SAP) accompanies the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP) during healing of a bone defect in the rat. J Bone Miner Res 6:401-410 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650060412
  44. Schilling T, Muller M, Minne HW, Ziegler R (1998) Influence of inflammationmediated osteopenia on the regional acceleratory phenomenon and the systemic acceleratory phenomenon during healing of a bone defect in the rat. Calcif Tissue Int 63:160-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900508
  45. Jeong TM, Kim YH, Song SI (2014) Anchor plate efficiency in postoperative orthodontic treatment following orthognathic surgery via minimal presurgical orthodontic treatment. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 36:154-160 https://doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.4.154
  46. Attishia R, Van Sickels JE, Cunningham LL (2015) Incidence of bracket failure during orthognathic surgery: a comparison of two techniques to establish interim maxillomandibular fixation. Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:143-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0468-z
  47. Camargo IB, Van Sickels JE, Laureano Filho JR, Cunningham LL (2016) Root contact with maxillomandibular fixation screws in orthognathic surgery: incidence and consequences. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:980-984 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.015
  48. Sugawara J, Nagasaka H, Yamada S, Yokota S, Takahashi T, Nanda R (2018) The application of orthodontic miniplates to Sendai surgery first. Semin Orthod 24:17-36 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.003

Cited by

  1. Modern Surgery-First Approach Concept in Cleft-Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Cohort Study with 3D Quantitative Analysis of Surgical-Occlusion Setup vol.8, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122116
  2. Current Orthognathic Practice in India: Do We Need to Change? vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01269-y
  3. The effect of 4-hexylresorinol administration on NAD+ level and SIRT activity in Saos-2 cells vol.43, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00326-2