DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Firefighters' Personal Protective Clothing with Nomex Honeycomb Fabric and its Protective and Comfort Evaluation

노멕스 허니콤 구조 직물을 적용한 소방관용 특수방화복 개발 및 이의 보호 쾌적 성능평가

  • Jung, Jae-Yeon (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising, and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ku, Ponjun (Dept. of Physical Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Do Hyung (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising, and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Min-Jae (Fire Protection Technology Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories(KCL)) ;
  • Kang, Sungwook (Fire Protection Technology Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories(KCL)) ;
  • Choi, Jeong-Yoon (Fire Protection Technology Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories(KCL)) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Young (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising, and Fashion Design, Seoul National University)
  • 정재연 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 구본준 (서울대학교 체육교육과) ;
  • 김도형 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 권민재 (한국건설생활환경시험연구원) ;
  • 강성욱 (한국건설생활환경시험연구원) ;
  • 최정윤 (한국건설생활환경시험연구원) ;
  • 이주영 (서울대학교 의류학과)
  • Received : 2019.04.15
  • Accepted : 2019.06.21
  • Published : 2019.10.30

Abstract

The present study newly developed a firefighters' protective jacket and pants using a Nomex honeycomb structured layer (HPC) in cases of being exposed to flashover or flameover. This study evaluated the protective and comfort functions of an HPC compared to the current KFI firefighters' protective clothing (FPC). The results are as follows. First, thermal protective performance (TPP) of fabric layers was 2.75 times greater for HPC than FPC at $125kW/m^2$. Second, the predicted second and third degree burn areas were smaller for HPC than FPC when using a flame manikin. Third, thermal insulation using a thermal manikin was 0.2 clo greater for HPC than FPC. Fourth, there were no marked differences in maximal performance, mobility, and microclimate temperature/humidity between FPC and HPC through human wear trials. The thermal insulation of HPC was higher than that of FPC; however, any negative effect of HPC thermal insulation on the comfort functions for firefighters was not found. In conclusion, the newly-developed HPC provided more protection in reducing burn injuries from $125kW/m^2$, while no negative impact on maximal performance, mobility and thermal comfort functions of firefighters, which is appropriate for quick-evasive tactics at the flashover, flameover or back draft fires.

Keywords

References

  1. Borg, G. A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 14(5), 377-381.
  2. 'Casualties and injuries of firefighters'. (2006). Power of truth. http://www.poweroftruth.net/column/mainView.php?kcat=2013&table=impeter&uid=547f
  3. Choi, J. W., & Kim, M. J. (2011). Clothing and health. Seoul: Gyomoon.
  4. Drysdale, D. (2005). An introduction to fire dynamics (2nd ed.). Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Gorbett, G. E., Hopkins, R., & Kennedy, P. (2007). The current knowledge & training regarding backdraft, flashover, and other rapid fire progression phenomena. Proceedings of the National Fire Protection Association World Safety Conference, Boston, MA.
  6. ISO 10551. (1995). Ergonomics of the thermal environment-Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
  7. ISO 13506. (2017). Protective clothing against heat and flame-test method for complete garments-prediction of burn injury using an instrumented manikin. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
  8. IS0 5084. (2017). Textiles -Determination of thickness of textiles and textile products. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
  9. ISO 9920. (2007). Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Estimation of thermal insulation and water vapour resistance of a clothing ensemble. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
  10. Kim, D. H., Jung, J. Y., Kim, D. H., & Lee, J. Y. (2019). Effects of wearing Nomex body cooling garment inside firefighting protective equipment on the efficiency of performance during simulated firefighters' tasks. Journal of Korean Living Environment System, 26(1), 9-24. doi:10.21086/ksles.2019.02.26.1.9
  11. Kim, S. Y. (2005). The relationship between clothing microclimate and cold/heat tolerance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  12. Kim, S. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2016). Development of firefighting performance test drills while wearing personal protective equipment. Fire Science, 30(1), 138-148. doi:10.7731/KIFSE.2016.30.1.138
  13. Lee, J. Y., Bakri , I., Kim, J. H., Son, S. Y., & Yutaka, T. (2013). The impact of firefighter personal protective equipment and treadmill protocol on maximal oxygen uptake. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 10(7), 397-407. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.792681
  14. NFPA 1971. (Eds.). (2013). Standard of protective ensembles for structural fire fighting and proximity fire fighting. Quincy, MA: Author.
  15. Park, J. (2019, March 20). Mathematical secrets in hexagonal architecture [육각형 건축물에 담긴 수학적 비밀]. Dong-a Ilbo. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from http://news.donga.com/3/all/20190319/94639064/1
  16. Rossi, R. M., Schmid, M., & Camenzind, M. A. (2014). Thermal energy transfer through heat protective clothing during a flame engulfment test. Textile Research Journal, 84(13), 1451-1460. doi:10.1177/0040517514521115
  17. 'Royal Air Force'. (2014, June 15). Do you wear your aircrew underwear?. The aircrew equipment integration group at the Royal Air Force Centre of aviation medicine conducted burn injury trials at the British Textiles Technology Group. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafiles/24A5AAA9_5056_A318_A86185BD6842BAF3.pdf.
  18. Testing standards of firefighters' protective equipment. (2013). Korea fire institute. https://www.kfi.or.kr/home/brd/brd230/brd230_Type2_ Lis.do?board_seq=40&article_seq=20304&cat_seq=62&search_con=undefined