DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Ayres Sensory Integration Intervention on Sensory Processing Ability and Motor Development in Children With Developmental Delay

Ayres 감각통합 중재가 발달지연 아동의 감각처리능력과 운동발달에 미치는 효과

  • Park, Ha-na (Dept. of Developmental Intervention, The Graduate School, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Mi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University)
  • 박하나 (인제대학교 대학원 발달중재학과) ;
  • 김경미 (인제대학교 보건의료융합대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.10
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Ayres's sensory integration (ASI) intervention on the sensory processing ability and motor development in children with Developmental Delay. Methods : 9 children in the experimental group and 8 children in the control group participated in this study for Developmental Delay children aged 3-5 years. For research tool, the Short Sensory Profile (SSP), Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2) are used. In the experimental group, individual sensory integration therapy according to principle of ASI was performed for twice a week, 40 minutes, and 16 times for 8 weeks. Methods for the data analysis included Mann Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Wilcoxon's signed rank test, Cohen's d test of SPSS 24.0. Results : In the ASI Intervention group, the sensory processing ability showed statistically significant difference in total score, movement sensitivity, auditory filtering and low energy/weak compared to the control group without ASI intervention (p<.05). In the ASI Intervention group, the motor development showed statistically significant difference in Gross Motor Quotient, Fine Motor Quotient and Total Motor Quotient compared to the control group without ASI intervention (p<.05). Conclusions : In this study, ASI intervention had a positive effect on the sensory processing and motor development in children with Developmental Delay.

목적 : 발달지연 아동을 대상으로 Ayres 감각통합중재를 적용하여 감각처리능력과 운동발달에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 만 3-5세의 발달지연 아동을 대상으로 실험군 9명과 대조군 8명이 본 연구에 참여하였고 Short Sensory Profile(SSP), Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2(PDMS-2)를 사용하였다. 실험군은 Ayres의 중심원리에 따른 개별 감각통합치료를 40분씩, 주 2회, 8주간 총 16회기를 실시하였다. 분석은 SPSS 24.0 의 카이스퀘어 검정, 맨휘트니 U검정, 윌콕슨 부호순위 검정, Cohen's d 검정으로 하였다. 연구결과 : Ayres의 감각통합중재를 실시한 실험군은 중재를 실시하지 않은 대조군에 비해 감각처리능력은 전체 점수와 움직임 민감성, 청각 여과하기, 낮은 에너지/허약함에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p<.05). 실험군과 대조군의 운동발달은 대근육운동발달지수, 소근육운동발달지수, 전체운동발달지수 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p<.05). 결론 : Ayres의 감각통합중재는 발달지연 아동의 감각처리능력과 운동발달에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents' perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287-93. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.3.287
  2. Ayelet, H. D., & Michelle, P. (2011). 1001 Pediatric treatment activities. Henderson: SLACK, INC.
  3. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  4. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services.
  5. Ayres, A. J., & Tickle, L. S. (1980). Hyper responsivity to touch and vestibular stimuli as a predictor of positive response to sensory integration procedures by Autistic children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34(6), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.34.6.375
  6. Bundy, A. C., Lane, S. J., & Murray, E. A. (2002). Sensory Integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
  7. Case-Smith, J. (2001). The effects of tactile defensiveness and tactile discrimination on in-hand manipulation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(9), 811-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.9.811
  8. Cho, Y. F., & Chung, H. C. (2009). Static postural control of 7 and 8 year old children with developmental coordination disorder in conditions with and without vision. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 37(2), 1325-1332. https://doi.org/10.51979/KSSLS.2009.08.37.1325
  9. Doll, E. A. (1965). Vineland social maturity scale: Condensed manual of directions. American guidance service.
  10. Dunn, W. (1999). Sensory profile: User's manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  11. Folio, M. R., & Fewell, R. R. (2000). Peabody developmental motor scales: Examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
  12. Frankenburg, W. K., Dodds, J., Archer, P., Bresnick, B., Maschka, P., Edelman N., et al. (1992). The Denver II: A major revision and restandardization of the denver developmental screening Test. American Academy of Pediatric Article, 89(1), 91-97.
  13. Ha, J. M., & Song, B. H. (2005). The effect of sensory integration training of gross motor function of cerebral palsy children and mental retardation children, Dankook University Special Education Research Institute, 14(4), 85-102.
  14. Hester, P. P., Baltodano, H. M., Gable, R. A., Tonelson, S. W., & Hendrickson, J. M. (2003). Early intervention with children at risk of emotional/behavioral disorders: A critical examination of research methodology and practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(4), 362-381.
  15. Jang, M. J., Choi, W. H., & Song, C. H. (2000). The effects of the large muscle exercise program on the development of the large muscle exercise in children with severe acute mental disorder. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 8(1), 91-103.
  16. Ji, S. Y., & Nam, K. Y. (2002). Postural control, bilateral coordination and motor planning outcomes in child with developmental delay who receive sensory integration therapy: Single subject research design. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 10(1), 63-70.
  17. Jung, B. N. (2015). Developmental patterns, child care environment, and clinical characteristics of infants with developmental delay. Master's thesis, Hanshin University Graduate School, Osan.
  18. Jung, H. J. (2004). An infant developmental disorder. Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 47(2), 131-142.
  19. Jung, H. L., Choi, Y. W., & Kim, K. M. (2013). A systematic review on sensory integration intervention in Korea: Focusing on Ayres Sensory Integration (ASI). Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 11(2), 27-40.
  20. Kientz, M. A., & Dunn, W. (1997). A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(7), 530-537. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.51.7.530
  21. Kim, G. M. (2009). The effectiveness of sensory integrative intervention: A systematic review. Korean Sensory Integration Therapy Journal, 7(2), 77-90.
  22. Kim, M. S. (2001). Comparison of sensory treatment capabilities of children with general childhood and developmental disabilities. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 9(1), 1-10.
  23. Kim, S. K., & Kim, O. K. (1977). A study on the standardization of social maturity examination. Dankook University's dissertation book, 11, 155-178.
  24. Kim, Y. H. (2005). Effects of sensory integration program on the balance, muscular power and agility of preschoolers with developmental delay. Master's thesis, Woosuk University Graduate School of Education, Wanju.
  25. Kim, Y. L. (2005). Effect of sensory integration training program and detraining on gross motor function and balance of mental retarded children. Doctoral dissertation, Gwangju University Graduate School of Physical Education, Gwangju.
  26. Kwak, M. S. (2003). A study on the effect of sensory integration program on the cognitive and motor abilities of children with developmental disabilities. Master's thesis, Woosuk University Graduate School of Education, Wanju.
  27. Lee, J. H. (2017). Study of concurrent validity and interrater reliability of Korean Version of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale2. Master's thesis, Inje University Graduate School, Kimhae.
  28. Lee, J. H., Bang, Y. S., Hwang, M. J., & Son, B. Y. (2017). The effects of sensory integration exercise program on postural control, balance, and attention of the child with developmental delay. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 11(2), 111-126.
  29. Mack, K. G. (2008). Beyond the barriers: A qualitative investigation into the experiences of general pediatricians working with young children exhibiting developmental delays and disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, South Florida.
  30. May-Benson, T. A., & Koomar, J. A. (2010). Systematic review of the research evidence examining the effectiveness of interventions using a sensory integrative approach for children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 403-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010. 09071
  31. McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, G. J. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: The case of rand. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.386
  32. McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Hagerman, R. J. (1999). Sensory modulation 60 disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162299001267
  33. Miller, L. J., Schoen, S. A., James, K., & Schaaf, R. C. (2007). Lessons learned: A pilot study on occupational therapy effectiveness for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 161-69. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.161
  34. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2012). A survey on the actual condition and the needs of service for improving the mental health of Korean children. Ministry of Health and Welfare.
  35. Nam, S. G. (2015). Understanding effect Sizes. Hanyang Medical Reviews, 35(1), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.40
  36. Parham, L. D., Roley, S. S., May-Benson, T. A., Koomar, J., Brett-Green, B., & Burke, J. P., et al. (2011). Development of a fidelity measure for research on the effectiveness of the Ayres Sensory integration intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 133-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000745
  37. Park, H. W., Kwag, K. J., & Park, K. B. (1996). Standardization of korean infant intelligent testing: Standardization study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, 9(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069925
  38. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  39. Roley, S. S., Blanche, E. E., & Schaaf, R. C. (2001). Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  40. Shin, H. S., Han, K. J., Oh, G. S., Oh, J. J., & Ha, M. N. (2002). Korean Type Denver 2 Inspection Guide. Seoul: Hyeonmunsa.
  41. Sices, L., Feudtner, C., Mc Laughlin, J., Drotar, D., & Williams, M. (2004). How do primary care physicians manage children with possible developmental delays? A national survey with an experimental design. Pediatrics, 113(2), 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.2.274
  42. Silove, N., Collins, F., & Ellaway, C. (2013). Update on the investigation of children with delayed development. Journal of Paediatric child health, 49(7), 519-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12176
  43. Stokes, N. A., Deitz, J. L., & Crowe, T. K. (1990). The Peabody developmental fine motor scale: An interrater reliability study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(4), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.4.334