재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제8권4호
  • /
  • Pages.65-76
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국판 TEMPA의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구

Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly (TEMPA)

  • 이창대 (New York University 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정민예 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박지혁 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김종배 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Lee, Chang-Dae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, New York University) ;
  • Jung, Min-Ye (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hyuk (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jongbae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.21
  • 심사 : 2019.04.29
  • 발행 : 2019.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 문화적 차이를 보이는 Upper extremity performance test for elderly (TEMPA)를 한국판으로 수정 및 번역하고 그 타당도 및 신뢰도를 검증하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 연구대상자는 40세이상의 손 기능에 장애가 없는 성인 171명과 손 기능에 장애가 있는 성인 41명 이었다. 내용 타당도와 분별 타당도를 검증하였고, 검사-재검사 신뢰도와 검사자 간 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 결과 : 내용 타당도를 통해 문화적 차이를 보이는 2개의 항목 ('자물쇠 열고 약통 열기', '편지 봉투 작성하고 우표 붙이기')을 수정하였다. 분별 타당도를 통해 TEMPA는 손 기능에 장애가 있는 성인과 없는 성인을 구별할 수 있는 평가 도구임을 확인 하였다 (p<.001). 신뢰도 검증 결과 수행 속도는 급간 내 상관계수(ICC)= .71-.92, 기능 정도는 카파계수 (kappa) = 1.0, 수행 분석은 ICC = 1.0로 중간수준에서 높은 수준의검사-재검사 신뢰도를 보였다. 검사자 간 신뢰도는 실행 속도 ICC = 1.0, 기능 정도 kappa = .79-1.0, 수행 분석 ICC = .94-1.0으로 상당한 수준에서 높은 수준의 신뢰도를 보였다. 결론 : TEMPA는 손 기능의 장애가 있는 성인을 구별해 낼 수 있고, 높은 수준의 신뢰도를 보이는 평가 도구로 임상적 평가 및 근거 기반의 연구에 있어 많이 사용되기를 기대한다.

Objective : This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly (TEMPA) by modifying its items to exhibit cultural differences. Methods : This study included 171 healthy adults and older adults and 41 individuals with impaired upper extremity function. Content validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results : The following items, exhibiting cultural differences, were modified: "open a lock and take the top off a pillbox" and "write and affix a postage stamp." The discriminant validity results indicated that participants with normal upper extremity function performed better than those with impaired in the upper extremity function (p<.001). The test-retest reliability of the execution speed (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) was .71-.94, functional rating (kappa) was 1.0, and task analysis (ICC) was 1.0. The inter-rater reliability of the speed of execution was 1.0, functional rating was .79-1.0, and task analysis was .94-1.0. Conclusion : TEMPA has moderate to high level of reliability and is an assessment tool that can clearly distinguish individuals with upper extremity impairment from those without impairment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, T. (2010). Construct validity: A unitary concept for occupational therapy assessment and measurement. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(1), 30-42. doi: 10.1016/S1569-1861(10)70056-5
  2. Carroll, D. (1965). A quantitative test of upper extremity function. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 18(5), 479-491. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90030-5
  3. Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hebert, R., Dutil, E., & Mercier, L. (1994a). Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(7), 751-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90130-9
  4. Desrosiers, J., Hebert, R., Dutil, E., & Bravo, G. (1993). Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly: The TEMPA. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(1), 9-16. doi:10.1177/000841749306000104
  5. Desrosiers, J., Hebert, R., Dutil, E., Bravo, G., & Mercier, L. (1994b). Validity of the TEMPA: A measurement instrument for upper extremity performance. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14(4), 267-281. doi: 10.1177/153944929401400405
  6. Desrosiers, J., Hebert, R., Bravo, G., & Dutil, E. (1995). The purdue pegboard test: Normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17(5), 217-224. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166638
  7. Feys, P., Duportail, M., Kos, D., Van Aschand, P., & Ketelaer, P. (2002). Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(2), 166-173. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr471oa
  8. Gonzalez-Calvo, J., Gonzalez, V. M., & Lorig, K. (1997). Cultural diversity issues in the development of valid and reliable measures of health status. Arthritis Care and Research: The Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 10(6), 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790100613
  9. Jacobson-Sollerman, C., & Sperling, L. (1976). Grip function of the healthy hand in a standardized hand function test: A study of the rancho los amigos test. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 9(3), 123-129.
  10. Jebsen, R. H., Taylor, N., Trieschmann, R., Trotter, M., & Howard, L. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), 311.
  11. Kim, H. (2008). The effects of hand function program on hand function and instrumental activities of daily living. The Journal of Occupational Therapy for the Aged and Dementia, 2(2), 1-12.
  12. Kopp, B., Kunkel, A., Flor, H., Platz, T., Rose, U., Mauritz, K. H., & Taub, E. (1997). The arm motor ability test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(6), 615-620. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90427-5
  13. Lee, C. D., & Jung, M. Y. (2015). A study of hand function assessment tools in Korean adults: A review. The Journal of Work Ability Association, 1(1), 39-50.
  14. Lemmens, R. J., Timmermans, A. A., Janssen-Potten, Y. J., Smeets, R. J., & Seelen, H. A. (2012). Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: A systematic review. BioMed Central Neurology, 12(1), 21. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-21
  15. Mathiowetz, V., Volland, G., Kashman, N., & Weber, K. (1985 a). Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(6), 386-391. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
  16. Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Kashman, N., & Volland, G. (1985 b). Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 5(1), 24-38. doi: 10.1177/153944928500500102
  17. Ogata, S., Kato, K., Honda, C., & Hayakawa, K. (2014). Common genetic factors influence hand strength, processing speed, and working memory. Journal of Epidemiology, 24(1), 31-38. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20130070
  18. Pendleton, M. H., & Schultz-Krohn, W. (2013). Pedretti's occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
  19. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489-497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
  20. Radomski, M. V., & Latham, C. A. T. (2013). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (7th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  21. Ranganathan, V. K., Siemionow, V., Sahgal, V., & Yue, G. H. (2001). Effects of aging on hand function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(11), 1478-1484. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911240.x
  22. Yoo, E., Jung, M., Park, S., & Choi, E. (2006). Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean occupational therapist. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 27-37.
  23. Vliet, V. T., Van der Wijk, T., Jolie, I., Zwinderman, A., & Hazes, J. (1996). Determinants of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 23(5), 835-840.