DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Subjective Health Knowledge and Environmental Exposure Reduction Behavior among the Elderly in Gongju City

공주시 노인의 주관적 건강 지식과 환경 노출 저감 행동의 관련성

  • Seo, Myung-Soon (Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Wook (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University)
  • 서명순 (고려대학교 의과대학 보건학협동과정) ;
  • 김경희 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 최재욱 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2020.09.18
  • Accepted : 2020.11.17
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the extent of environmental exposure reduction behavior among the elderly living in Gongju City was identified according to demographic and sociological characteristics of individual health behavior and environmental factors. In addition, the relationship between subjective health knowledge and environmental exposure reduction behavior among the elderly was investigated. Methods: Demographic and sociological factors, subjective health status, environmental factors, and environmental exposure reduction behavior were investigated among 120 elderly people in Gongju City. Through multiple regression analysis, variables with significant relationships with environmental exposure reduction behavior were identified (SPSS ver. 22, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The survey (IRB-2018-0096) was conducted over about two weeks (from Dec. 3 to 14, 2018). Results: The extent of practicing environmental exposure reduction behavior by the elderly in Gongju City was high in terms of cleaning, ventilation when cooking food, periodic outdoor activities, and ventilation when smoking. Significant variables were gender, past smoking and current non-smoking, subjective health knowledge, and subjective health status. The most influential variable was subjective health knowledge (β= .411). Conclusion: There was a significant relationship between the level of subjective health knowledge and the level of objective education for health behavior related to the reduction of environmental exposure among the elderly.

Keywords

References

  1. Resident Registration Population Statistics. Ministry of Interior and Safety. 2019.
  2. Shin YJ, Kim MH. Why Do Health Inequalities Matter? The Korean Society of Prevention Medicine. 2007; 40(6): 419-421.
  3. WHO. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks, 2nd ed. 2016.
  4. Simoni M, Baldacci S, Maio S, Cerrai S, Sarno G, Viegi G. Adverse effects of outdoor pollution in the elderly. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2015; 7(1): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.10
  5. Lee SG. Association between environmental perception and subjective health status of older adults. J Environ Health Sci. 2018; 44(4): 391-396.
  6. Shah AS, Langrish JP, Nair H, McAllister DA, Hunter AL, Donaldson K, et al. Global association of air pollution and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382(9897): 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60898-3
  7. Goldberg MS, Burnett RT, Stieb DM, Brophy JM, Daskalopoulou SS, Valois MF, et al. Associations between ambient air pollution and daily mortality among elderly persons in Montreal, Quebec. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 463-464: 931-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.095
  8. Pun VC, Kazemiparkouhi F, Manjourides J, Suh HH. Long-term PM2.5 exposures and respiratory, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in older US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2017; 186(8): 961-969. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx166
  9. Ministry of Environment. Comprehensive evaluation for environmental exposures and health effects in elderly population. 2015.
  10. Park MK, Kim GS. factors influencing health behavior related to particulate matter in older adults. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020; 50(3): 431-443. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.19201
  11. Brewer NT, Tzeng JP, Lillie SE, Edwards AS, Peppercorn JM, Rimer BK. Health literacy and cancer risk perception: Implications for genomic risk communication. Medical Decision Making. 2009; 29(2): 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08327111
  12. Kim MI, Kim HJ, Lee SW. A study on the self-rated health of the elderly in seoul according to their preparation for old age using Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM). Health and Social Welfare Review. 2013; 33(3): 327-360. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2013.33.3.327
  13. EPA. Risk Communication in Action. The Risk Communication Workbook; 2019.
  14. Prieto-Flores ME, Moreno-Jimenez A, Fernandez-Mayoralas G, Rosenberg MW, Rojo-Perez F, Forjaz MJ. The relative contribution of health status and quality of life domains in subjective health in old age. Social Indicators Research. 2012; 106: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9791-z
  15. Calvo E, Sarkisian N, Tamborini CR. Causal effect of retirement timing on subjective physical and emotional health. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2013; 68(1): 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs097
  16. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Prothrow-stith D. Income distribution and mortality: cross-sectional ecological study of the robin hood index in the United States. British Medical Journal. 1996; 312: 1004-1007. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1004
  17. Judge K, Mulligan J, Benzeval M. Income inequality and population health. Social Science and Medicine. 1998; 46(4-5): 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00204-9
  18. Cohen DA, Farley TA, Mason, K. Why is Poverty Unhealthy? Social and Physical Mediators. Social Science and Medicine. 2003; 57: 1631-1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00015-7
  19. Lee EK. Current issues and policy directions for the national health insurance. Health and Welfare Policy Forum. 2018; 256: 51-64.
  20. Lee SJ, Shim MS. Effects of health literacy and unmet health care needs on health promotion behavior among elderly in the community. Korean Society of Public Health Nursing. 2020; 8: 238-250.
  21. Ministry of Environment. Environmental health guide for the elderly. 2015.
  22. Sandel M, Baeder A, Bradman A, Hughes J, Mitchell C, Shaughnessy R, et al. Housing interventions and control of health-realted chemical agents: a review of the evidence. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010; 16(5): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181bee67d
  23. Sobotava L, Liu YH, Burakoff A, Sevcikova L, Weitzman M. Housing exposure to secondhand smoke is associated with decreased physical and mental health of mothers in the USA. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15: 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0549-z
  24. Tischer CG, Heinrich J. Exposure assessment of residential mold, fungi and michrobial components in relation to children's health: achievements and challenges. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013; 216(2): 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.05.002
  25. Mendes A, Pereira C, Mendes D, Aguiar L, Neves P, Silva S, et al. Indoor air quality and theraml comfort-results of a pilot study in elderly care centers in Portugal. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013; 76(4-5): 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2013.757213
  26. Park YJ, Kim KJ. The Effects of Meaning of Life and Depression on Health- Promoting Behaviors of the Elderly-Focusing on the Elderly Who Participated in Community Health Programs. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2017; 15(5): 411-417. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.411
  27. Duan W, Sheng J.How can environmental knowledge transfer into pro-environmental behavior among Chinese individuals? Environmental pollution perception matters. Journal of Public Health. 2018; 26: 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0873-5
  28. Majumder S, Sihabut T, Saroar MG. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices against inhaled particulate matter among urban residents in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of Health Research. 2019; 33(6): 460-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-12-2018-0168
  29. Rimal RN, Real K. Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research. 2003; 29(3): 370-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/29.3.370