Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the physicochemical properties of sausage analogue made with mixed bean protein concentrate

혼합농축콩단백을 첨가한 대체 소시지의 이화학적 특성에 관한 연구

  • Cha, Seo-Hui (Department Food Science and Biotechnology, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Shin, Kyung-Ok (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Han, Kyoung-Sik (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sahmyook University)
  • 차서희 (삼육대학교 식품생명산업학과) ;
  • 신경옥 (삼육대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 한경식 (삼육대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2020.07.29
  • Accepted : 2020.10.08
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to optimize the mixing ratio of mixed bean protein concentrate (MBPC) and to improve the quality of sausage analogues. Soybean (Glycine max MERR), mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus L.), red bean [Vigna angularis (Wild.)], and pea (Pisum sativum L.) were mixed and processed to produce a MBPC, which was used to make a sausage analogue. The protein, moisture, and carbohydrate content were significantly (p<0.05) different among the samples. A significant (p<0.05) improvement was observed in textural properties (hardness, gumminess, and chewiness), cooking loss, frying loss, and emulsion stability of the sausage analogue. This study suggested the possibility of attaining high-quality sausage analogues and partial sausage analogues using MBPC, which could serve as a potential ingredient in meat analogues.

본 연구는 우리나라에서 재배되는 대두, 녹두, 적두 및 완두 4종 콩 원물을 한 번에 추출하여 만든 혼합농축콩단백을 이용하여 대체 소시지를 개발하여 물리화학적 특성을 닭 소시지와 비교하였다. 경제성과 영양학적 특성을 고려하여 4종 콩 원물의 최적 혼합 비율을 설정하여 혼합농축콩단백을 추출하였을 때 혼합 농축단백 100 g을 기준으로 한국인 성인 남성 기준의 필수 아미노산 하루 평균 필요량이 충족되었다. 혼합농축콩단백을 이용하여 대체 소시지, 부분적 대체 소시지 및 닭 소시지의 물리화학적 분석 결과, 대체 소시지가 닭 소시지에 비해 요리 손실량, 튀김 손실량 및 유화성이 유의적으로 낮게 나타났으며(p<0.05), 닭 소시지 보다 물리화학적 품질이 우수하였다. 개발된 소시지의 물성적 특성은 대체 소시지가 닭 소시지에 비해 경도, 응집성, 검성, 씹힘성 및 탄성이 유의하게 높았다(p<0.05). 개발된 소시지의 색도 특성은 대체 소시지의 적색도(a) 및 황색도(b)가 닭 소시지에 비해 유의하게 높았고(p<0.05), 명도(L)는 닭 소시지가 대체 소시지에 비해 유의하게 높았으며(p<0.05), 부분적 대체 소시지는 대체 소시지와 닭 소시지의 사이 특성을 보였다. 따라서 본 연구를 종합해 볼 때, 혼합농축콩단백 소재가 영양학적인 면이 강화되었음을 확인하여 대체육 식품 소재로써의 활용 가능할 것으로 판단된다. 또한, 육류가 조금 들어간 부분적 대체 소시지는 육제품의 섭취를 줄이고 싶은 소비자를 대상으로 하는 대체육 산업에 잠재적인 가능성을 보였으며, 본 연구에서 개발된 대체 소시지는 식품 개발에 기초자료로서 활용 가능성을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Goithersburg MD, USA (2005)
  2. Arora B, Kamal S, Sharma VP. Effect of binding agents on quality characteristics of mushroom based sausage analogue. J. Food Process. Preserv. 41: e13134 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13134
  3. Bhat ZF, Fayaz H. Prospectus of cultured meat-advancing meat alternatives. J. Food sci. technol. 48: 125-140 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0198-7
  4. Bhat ZF, Kumar S, Fayaz H. In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. J. Integr. Agric. 14: 241-248 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60887-x
  5. Bohrer BM. An investigation of the formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat analogue products. Food Science and Human Wellness (2019)
  6. Curtain F, Grafenauer S. Plant-based meat substitutes in the flexitarian age: An audit of products on supermarket shelves. Nutrients. 11: 2603 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112603
  7. Ekmekcioglu C, Wallner P, Kundi M, Weisz U, Haas W, Hutter HP. Red meat, diseases, and healthy alternatives: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58: 247-261 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1158148
  8. Gorissen SH, Crombag JJ, Senden JM, Waterval WH, Bierau J, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. Amino Acids. 50: 1685-1695 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2640-5
  9. Huang S, Wang LM, Sivendiran T, Bohrer BM. Amino acid concentration of high protein food products and an overview of the current methods used to determine protein quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58: 2673-2678 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1396202
  10. Ismail I, Hwang YH, Joo ST. Meat analog as future food: a review. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 62: 111 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.111
  11. Kamani MH, Meera MS, Bhaskar N, Modi VK. Partial and total replacement of meat by plant-based proteins in chicken sausage: evaluation of mechanical, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics. J. Food Sci. Technol. 56: 2660-2669 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03754-1
  12. Kassama LS, Ngadi MO, Raghavan GS. Structural and instrumental textural properties of meat patties containing soy protein. Int. J. Food Prop. 6: 519-529 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1081/JFP-120021456
  13. Kim H, Bae J, Wi G, Kim HT, Cho Y, Choi MJ. Physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of meat analog mixed with different liquid materials as an animal fat substitute. Food Eng. Prog. 23, 62-68 (2019) https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2019.23.1.62
  14. Kim HA, Kim BC, Kim YK. Quality characteristics of the sausages added with pepper seed powder and pepper seed oil. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 29: 283-289 (2013) https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.3.283
  15. KREI [Korea Rural Economic Institute]. Grain statistical data. Available from: Accessed May 20, http://www.krei.re.kr/krei/index.do (2019)
  16. Kumar P, Chatli MK, Mehta N, Singh P, Malav OP, Verma AK. Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57: 923-932 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.939739
  17. Lee SH, Kim HY. Effect of red pepper seed powder on the quality characteristics of chicken thigh frankfurters. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 48: 372-377 (2016) https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2016.48.4.372
  18. Lee KC, Lee SK, Kim HK. Chemical compositions of the Four lines of Korea native chickens. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 43: 119-128 (2016) https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.2.119
  19. Majzoobi M, Talebanfar S, Eskandari MH, Farahnaky A. Improving the quality of meatfree sausages using κ-carrageenan, konjac mannan and xanthan gum. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52: 1269-1275 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13394
  20. Moon YH, Kim YK, Koh CW, Hyon JS, Jung IC. Effect of aging period, cooking time and temperature on the textural and sensory characteristics of boiled pork loin. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 30: 471-476 (2001)
  21. Nosworthy MG, House JD. Factors influencing the quality of dietary proteins: Implications for pulses. Cereal Chem. 94: 49-57 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-04-16-0104-FI
  22. Park KS, Choi YS, Kim HY, Song DH, Lee SY, Choi JH, KimCJ. Effects of wheat fiber with breading on quality characteristics of pork loin cutlet. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 32: 504-511 (2012) https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.4.504
  23. RDA. Food composition table I. 7 revision. Rural Development Administration. Jeonju, Korea. pp. 244-245 (2006)
  24. Samard S, Ryu GH. A comparison of physicochemical characteristics, texture, and structure of meat analogue and meats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99: 2708-2715 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9438
  25. Savadkoohi S, Hoogenkamp H, Shamsi K, Farahnaky A. Color, sensory and textural attributes of beef frankfurter, beef ham and meat-free sausage containing tomato pomace. Meat Sci. 97: 410-418 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.017
  26. Sharima-Abdullah N, Hassan CZ, Arifin N, Huda-Faujan N. Physicochemical properties and consumer preference of imitation chicken nuggets produced from chickpea flour and textured vegetable protein. Food Res. Int. 25: 1016-1025 (2018)
  27. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2015. Seoul, Korea. pp. vi- (2015)
  28. van Vliet S, Burd NA, van Loon LJ. The skeletal muscle anabolic response to plant-versus animal-based protein consumption. J. Nutr. 145: 1981-1991 (2015) https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.204305
  29. Vasconcelos MW, Gomes AM. The legume grains: when tradition goes hand in hand with nutrition. In Traditional Foods, pp. 189-208. Springer, Boston, MA (2016)
  30. Verbeke WA, Viaene J. Ethical challenges for livestock production: Meeting consumer concerns about meat safety and animalwelfare. J Agric. Environ. Ethics. 12: 141-151 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009538613588
  31. You GY, Yong HI, Yu MH, Jeon KH. Development of meat analogues using vegetable protein: A review. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 52: 167-171 (2020) https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2020.52.2.167