DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discourse Analysis of News Articles on the U.S and China Trade War in Korean Press

  • Ban, Hyun (Dept. of Mass Communication, Incheon National Univ.) ;
  • Noh, Bo Kyung (Dept. of Korea-English Interpretation and Translation, Seoul University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2020.11.30
  • Accepted : 2020.12.18
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

In the global economy, trade is not confined in geological boundaries, enhancing the international relation among countries. However, the trade tension between the largest economy and the second-largest economy raise concerns among the world economies, enhancing the uncertainties around world. In particular, the trade tension between the two countries is highly related with South Korea's trade balance, because the country is highly dependent on the trade with the two countries. Given this, we analyzed the news editorials published in Korean quality newsaper, with related to U.S. and China Trade War by looking at the ideological perspectives of news outlets or journalists to the issue within the framework of critical discourse analysis. In particular we gave a special attention to the attitude to each country in order to investigate their ideological stance to the country, following van Dijk (1998)' ideological square. The results are as follows: first, the Chosun Ilbo emphasized 'their' bad properties directly and aggresively, while the Hankyoreh designated the U.S. as a member of an out-group, thus mitigating 'our' bad quatilies; Second, the two strategies of emphasis and mitigation enabled both newspapers to reinforce in-group homogeneity and out-group exclusion. Thus, we could conclude that the editorial is a clear indicator to show the news outlet's ideological stance to each country in regard to the trade issue.

Keywords

References

  1. T. A., van Dijk, News as Discourse, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
  2. E. S. Herman and N. Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Pantheon Books, 2002
  3. T. A., van Dijk, News as Discourse, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
  4. F. Haney and C. Tator, Discourse and Domination: Racial Bias in the Canadian English-Language Press, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002.
  5. T. A., van Dijk, 'Ideology and Discourse Analysis,' Journal of Political Ideologies, 11, 115-140, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
  6. A. Bell, The Language of New Media, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
  7. T. A., van Dijk, 'Race, riots, and the Press: An analysis of Editorials in the British press about 1985 disorders,' Gazette, 43, 229-253, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928904300305
  8. T. A., van Dijk, 'Opinion and Ideologies in the Press,' In A. Bell & P. Garrett (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse, 21-63. Malden, MA: Blackwall, 1998.
  9. R. Fowler, Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press, London: Routledge, 1991.
  10. N. Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis, New York: Longman Group Ltd., 1995.
  11. H. Ban and B. K. Noh, 'Analyzing Quotation in News Reporting from Western Foreign Press: Focusing on Evaluative Language,' International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 4-3, Sept. 2016.