DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Invasion of the canalis sinuosus by dental implants: A report of 3 cases

  • Received : 2020.05.25
  • Accepted : 2020.07.21
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

The canalis sinuosus (CS) and its accessory canals (ACs) are anatomical structures in the anterior maxilla. These structures are often neglected when planning implant surgery because their clinical significance is still not well-defined. After a retrospective evaluation of 194 patients rehabilitated with dental implants in the anterior maxilla, 3 patients were identified who presented unexpected chronic neurosensory disturbances without any clinical signs supportive of implant failure. Tomographic assessment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed the invasion of the CS and ACs by dental implants, which appeared to explain the patients' symptoms. The purpose of this report was to familiarize practicing dentists and specialists with the CS and its ACs. Unanticipated neurosensory symptoms after implant placement in the anterior maxilla justify the use of CBCT to rule out an injury to this neurovascular bundle.

Keywords

References

  1. Gurler G, Delilbasi C, Ogut EE, Aydin K, Sakul U. Evaluation of the morphology of the canalis sinuosus using cone-beam computed tomography in patients with maxillary impacted canines. Imaging Sci Dent 2017; 47: 69-74. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.69
  2. Jones FW. The anterior superior alveolar nerve and vessels. J Anat 1939; 73: 583-91.
  3. Shelley AM, Rushton VE, Horner K. Canalis sinuosus mimicking a periapical inflammatory lesion. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 378-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800116a
  4. Manhaes Junior LR, Villaça-Carvalho MF, Moraes ME, Lopes SL, Silva MB, Junqueira JL. Location and classification of canalis sinuosus for cone beam computed tomography: avoiding misdiagnosis. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30: e49.
  5. Neves FS, Crusoe-Souza M, Franco LC, Caria PH, Bonfim-Almeida P, Crusoe-Rebello I. Canalis sinuosus: a rare anatomical variation. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34: 563-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0907-6
  6. de Oliveira-Santos C, Rubira-Bullen IR, Monteiro SA, Leon JE, Jacobs R. Neurovascular anatomical variations in the anterior palate observed on CBCT images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 1044-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02497.x
  7. Torres MG, de Faro Valverde L, Vidal MT, Crusoe-Rebello IM. Branch of the canalis sinuosus: a rare anatomical variation - a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2015; 37: 879-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1432-9
  8. Arruda JA, Silva P, Silva L, Álvares P, Silva L, Zavanelli R, et al. Dental implant in the canalis sinuosus: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dent 2017; 2017: 4810123.
  9. Ferlin R, Pagin BS, Yaedu RY. Canalis sinuosus: a systematic review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2019; 127: 545-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.12.017
  10. Hu KS, Kwak HH, Song WC, Kang HJ, Kim HC, Fontaine C, et al. Branching patterns of the infraorbital nerve and topography within the infraorbital space. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17: 1111-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000236436.97720.5f
  11. Machado VC, Chrcanovic BR, Felippe MB, Manhaes Junior LR, de Carvalho PS. Assessment of accessory canals of the canalis sinuosus: a study of 1000 cone beam computed tomography examinations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45: 1586-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.007
  12. von Arx T, Lozanoff S, Sendi P, Bornstein MM. Assessment of bone channels other than the nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla using limited cone beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2013; 35: 783-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1110-8
  13. Kohavi D. Demostration of unusually wide artery in the maxillary alveolar bone using a reformatting program of computed tomography: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 444-8.
  14. Temmerman A, Hertele S, Teughels W, Dekeyser C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures? Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 189-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x
  15. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113: 817-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005
  16. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 631-45. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.631
  17. Rodella LF, Buffoli B, Labanca M, Rezzani R. A review of the mandibular and maxillary nerve supplies and their clinical relevance. Arch Oral Biol 2012; 57: 323-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.09.007
  18. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I. An assessment on spiral CT scan of the superior and inferior genial spinal foramina and canals. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28: 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0055-y
  19. Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02010.x
  20. Al-Sabbagh M, Okeson JP, Khalaf MW, Bhavsar I. Persistent pain and neurosensory disturbance after dental implant surgery: pathophysiology, etiology, and diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 2015; 59: 131-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.004
  21. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla by means of immediate implantation and provisionalization: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 897-904.
  22. Gunaseelan R, Anantanarayanan P, Veerabahu M, Vikraman B, Sripal R. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in anterior maxillary osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 103 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1269-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.051
  23. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 68-72.
  24. Gaeta-Araujo H, Oliveira-Santos N, Mancini AX, Oliveira ML, Oliveira-Santos C. Retrospective assessment of dental implant-related perforations of relevant anatomical structures and inadequate spacing between implants/teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 3281-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03205-8

Cited by

  1. Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics of Anterior Maxilla Accessory Canals and Relationship with Nasopalatine Canal Type-A CBCT Study vol.11, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081510