DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating the value optimized forest carbon offset projects based on forest management scenarios in South Korea

  • Woo, Heesung (School of Forest Science and Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Joowon (School of Forest Science and Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Kyoo (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute)
  • Received : 2020.09.25
  • Accepted : 2020.10.30
  • Published : 2020.12.01

Abstract

One hundred ninety-five countries reached agreement on a new climate treaty in Paris, France to reduce the carbon emissions. South Korea has been selected as a target country for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) obligations since 2020. In this context, the Korean government developed several GHG emissions reduction programs using forests called the "Forest carbon offset scheme (FCOS)." The forest management method is one of the tools to implement FCOS. Most of the participants registered forest management as the preferred methodology to participate in the FCOS. For a successful implementation of the FCOS, it is necessary to explore the optimal methods by considering the cost-effective aspect of conducting the forest management as a tool to increase carbon absorption. In this context, this study investigated the value optimized FCOS projects based on the forest management methodology in South Korea. Three forest management scenarios, 1) extending the final age of maturity of Pinus densiflora stands (S1), 2) extending the final age of maturity of Quercus acutissima stands (S2), and 3) reforestation with new species (Pinus densiflora to Quercus acutissima) (S3), were examined and evaluated to identify the optimal carbon absorption and value optimized economic perspective. The results of the scenario-based modelling indicated that S3 showed value optimized from an economical perspective, and S2 was the most effective method to absorb carbon among the scenarios. It is anticipated that this paper will contribute to provide valuable information by presenting innovative approaches as a value optimized FCOS implementing tool in a GHG reduction program in South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. EU-ETS (EU Emissions Trading System). 2020. CO2 European emission allowances (commodity). Accessed in https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/co2-european-emission-allowances on 18 December 2019.
  2. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2003. Good practice guidelines on land use, land use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan.
  3. KFCC (Korea Forest Carbon Center). 2017. Administrative cost estimation tool for forest carbon offset project ver3.0. KFCC, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  4. KFCC (Korea Forest Carbon Center). 2020. The registration status of forest carbon offset scheme projects. KFCC, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  5. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2013. Guideline for implementing and supervising forest reforestation. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  6. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2014. The estimated forest volume and biomass in South Korea. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  7. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2015a. Forest carbon offset scheme brochure. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  8. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2015b. Guidelines for sustainable forest resources management. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2019a. Enforcement rules of the forest resources development and management act. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  10. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2019b. The guideline of application of the extension final age of maturity in forest carbon offset scheme in South Korea Ver 1.0. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  11. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2020. Guideline for implementing and supervising forest tending works. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  12. Kim YH. 2016. Analysis of the average abatement cost of forest carbon offset projects for the government purchase of forest carbon credits. Journal of Climate Change Research 7:391-396. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2016.7.4.391
  13. KoPFI (Korea Forstry Promotion Institute). 2018. The trend of Korean domestic wood market price. KoPFI, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  14. Lee JS, Kang HC, Yu SY, Lee JH, Park SW. 2014. A study on the post-2020 new climate system and reduction goal upward negotiation strategy. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  15. Lee SS, Pyo JG, Yoon SH. 2016. Strategy of forest carbon offset scheme to enhance the Chungcheongnam do climate change planning. Chungnam Institute, Gongju, Korea. [in Korean]
  16. Oberthur S, Ott HE. 1999. The Kyoto protocol: International climate policy for the 21st century. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany.
  17. Park MS, Youn YC. 2012. Developmnet of South Korean REDD+ strategies for forest carbon credit. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 20:19-48. [in Korean]
  18. Tavoni M, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Van Vuuren DP, Aboumahboub T, Bowen A, Calvin K, Campiglio E, Kober T, Jewell J, Luderer G, Marangoni G, McCollum D, Van Sluisveld M, Zimmer A, Van der Zwann B. 2015. Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models. Nature Climate Change 5:119-126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2475