DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The status and development of bilateral international cooperation in the forestry sector: the selection of priority partner countries for Korea's REDD+ programs

  • Kim, Ki Hyun (Organization and Management Innovation Division, Korea Forest Service) ;
  • Lee, Bohwi (Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sebin (Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2020.08.25
  • Accepted : 2020.11.27
  • Published : 2020.12.01

Abstract

Global attention to the greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation is increasing. There is a growing recognition of reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation plus (REDD+) as an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the forestry sector. The Republic of Korea is implementing REDD+ pilot projects in four Southeast Asian countries as part of its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluates countries with the potential to become priority partner countries for Korea's REDD+ programs, using the following five criteria: The first criterion is that a country should include the forest sector and REDD+ in its national plan for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The second and third criteria refer to an average forest coverage rate of over 44% and a forest change rate of over - 0.1%, among the countries with forest cover of more than 10 million ha. The fourth criterion is that the country should meet the Forest Reference Emission Level requirements, one of the four elements of the Warsaw REDD+ Framework. The fifth criterion is that the country should have bilateral relations with the Republic of Korea in forestry while at the same time be a partner country for cooperation on climate change as well as a REDD+ pilot country. Based on our evaluation, we conclude that the first priority countries are Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar. The second priority countries include Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru. Finally, the third priority countries are Columbia, Congo, and Mozambique. This study suggests that for the selection of priority partner countries, Korean REDD+ programs should center on existing REDD+ pilot countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Alounsavath P, Kim SB, Lee BH. 2019. The major factors effecting the decrease of forest cover in the Huaphanh Province, Northern Laos. Korean Journal of Agriocultural Science 46:219-228.
  2. Angelsen A. 2009. Realizing REDD+: National stragety and policy options. CIFOR, Borgor, Indonesia. [in Korean]
  3. Bae JS. 2013. Indonesia's REDD+ national strategy between ideal and reality. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 102:189-197. [in Korean]
  4. Bae JS, Seol MH. 2012. Selection of bilateral cooperation countries between Korea and developing countries for REDD+: Based on forest coverage rate and deforestation rate. The Korean Society of International Agriculture 24:397-403. [in Korean]
  5. Duchelle AE, Seymour F, Brockhaus M, Angelsen A, Larson AM, Moeliono M, Wong GM, Pham TT, Martius C. 2019. ISSUE BRIEF, forest-based climate mitigation: Lessons from REDD+ implementation. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
  6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2020. Global forest resource assessment 2020 key findings. FAO, Rome, Itlay.
  7. Fonesca GAB, Rodriguez CM, Midgley G, Busch J, Hanah L, Mittermeier RA. 2007. No forest left behind. PLoS Biology 5:1645-1646.
  8. Jeong JH. 2015. Trends in INDCs. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. Jeong KH, Hwang SY. 2016. Analysis of optimal power mix in era of post-2020 - INDC. Legislation and Policy Studies 8:299-317. [in Korean]
  10. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2019a. A revised roadmap for the GHG emission reduction in the forestry sector. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  11. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2019b. Mid-term and long-term implementation action plan for REDD+ in the forestry sector (2020-2024). KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  12. Kim RH, Bae JS. 2014. Warsaw REDD+ framework: Prospect and action. Topics in International Forest Policy vol. 1. National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  13. Kim RH, Lee DH, Yim JS, Lee NR, Oh KM, Kim MK. 2019. The major outcomes of the negotiations on the forestry sector (LULUCF) at the UNFCCC COP24 & Future Directions. Topics in International Forest Policy 79:1-14. [in Korean]
  14. Kim SJ. 2019. A study of middle power climate-forestry diplomacy for establishing REDD. The Journal of Political Science and Communication 22:55-90. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.15617/psc.2019.10.31.3.55
  15. Kim TI, Kim SI, Victor T, Lee DH, Choi GY. 2011. International trend of REDD discussion and it's policy implication. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 100:548-557. [in Korean]
  16. Kim YH, Yim JS, Yoo DH, Lee SJ, Bae JS, Son YM, Jeon HS, Lee DH. 2017. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) and a long-term strategy. National Institute of Forest Science Research Studies, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  17. Lee DH. 2018. Status of international assistance for the development of subnational REDD+ programs and implications. Topics in International Forest Policy 66:133-148. [in Korean]
  18. Lee SK, Choi HY, Son YH, Lee WK. 2010. Current issues and future directions of REDD: (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) and plus. Journal of Energy and Climate Change 5:85-98. [in Korean]
  19. Lee YJ. 2015. Trends in INDCs and their gross effects. Climate Change and Green Growth 10:15-24. [in Korean]
  20. Noh YS, Hwang JS, Jeong SK, Bae JS. 2012. Indonesia REDD+: National strategy & Japan's REDD+ pilot project case. National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  21. Park HC, Oh CH. 2012. A study of baseline approach for implementing program of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in South Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26:484-497. [in Korean]
  22. Park HJ. 2019. REDD+ programs' significant contribution to GHG emission reduction. Future Eco 116:48-49. [in Korean]
  23. Park JM, Seo HS, Lee JS. 2016. Implications for Japan's national REDD+ strategies - focused on joint credit mechanism (JCM). Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 105:238-246. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2016.105.2.238
  24. Park MS, Youn YC. 2012. Development of south Korean REDD+ strategies for forest carbon credits. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 20:19-48. [in Korean]
  25. Seok HD, Yoon BS. 2010. Understanding of the UNFCCC REDD+ mechanism and prospect of REDD+ negotiations. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  26. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2007. Reducing emission from deforestation in developing countries: Approaches to stimulate action. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1. pp. 8-11. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany.
  27. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2019. Climate change and land, An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Summary for policymakers. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland.
  28. Yoon SJ, Bae JS, Kim CM, Song MK. 2014. Cambodia REDD+ national policy: Country roadmap & implementation capacity assessment. National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]