DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spermatozoa motility, viability, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and plasma membrane integrity in 0.25 mL and 0.5 mL straw after frozen-thawing in Hanwoo bull

  • Kang, Sung-Sik (Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Kim, Ui-Hyung (Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Suk (Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Lee, Seok-Dong (Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Cho, Sang-Rae (Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA))
  • Received : 2020.10.20
  • Accepted : 2020.11.30
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the effect of straw size on spermatozoa motility, viability, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and plasma membrane integrity after freezing-thawing. Hanwoo semen was collected from three bulls and diluted with an animal protein-free extender, divided into two groups, namely, 10 million spermatozoa in 0.25 mL and 20 million spermatozoa in 0.5 mL straw, and cryopreserved. In Experiment 1, the motility and motility parameters of the frozen-thawed spermatozoa were evaluated. After freezing-thawing, the spermatozoa motility parameters fast progressive, straight line velocity, and average path velocity were compared between the 0.25 mL straw and 0.5 mL straw groups. They were 35.2 ± 1.0 and 32.3 ± 0.7%, 34.6 ± 0.7 and 31.8 ± 0.5 μm/s, 51.4 ± 1.3 and 47.1 ± 1.1 μm/s, 0.25 mL straw and 0.5 mL straw groups, respectively. In Experiment 2, the viability, acrosome membrane integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential of the frozen-thawed spermatozoa were assessed. After freezing-thawing, the percentages of spermatozoa with live, intact acrosomes and high mitochondrial membrane potential were compared between the in 0.25 mL straw and 0.5 mL straw groups. They were 48.0 ± 2.6% and 35.6 ± 2.8% between the 0.25 mL straw and 0.5 mL straw groups. In Experiment 3, the plasma membrane integrity of frozen-thawed spermatozoa was compared. After freezing-thawing, the plasma membrane integrity was higher for the in 0.25 mL straw group than the 0.5 mL straw group. They were 62.0 ± 2.2 and 54.1 ± 1.3% between the 0.25 mL straw and 0.5 mL straw groups. In conclusion, our results suggest that freezing semen in 0.25 mL straw improves the relative motility, viability, and acrosomal, mitochondrial membrane potential, and plasma membrane integrity of Hanwoo bull spermatozoa.

Keywords

References

  1. Ansari MS, Rakha BA, Andrabi SM, Akhter S. 2011. Effect of straw size and thawing time on quality of cryopreserved buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen. Reprod. Biol. 11:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60063-1
  2. Anzar M, Kroetsch T, Boswall L. 2011. Cryopreservation of bull semen shipped overnight and its effect on post-thaw sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and normal acrosomes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 126:23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.04.018
  3. Anzar M, Rajapaksha K, Boswall L. 2019. Egg yolk-free cryopreservation of bull semen. PLoS One 14:e0223977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223977
  4. Berry DP, Ring SC, Twomey AJ, Evans RD. 2020. Choice of artificial insemination beef bulls used to mate with female dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 103:1701-1710. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17430
  5. Birck A, Christensen P, Labouriau R, Pedersen J, Borchersen S. 2010. In vitro induction of the acrosome reaction in bull sperm and the relationship to field fertility using low-dose inseminations. Theriogenology 73:1180-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.010
  6. Bousseau S, Brillard JP, Marguant-Le Guienne B, Guerin B, Camus A, Lechat M. 1998. Comparison of bacteriological qualities of various egg yolk sources and the in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or lecithin based diluents. Theriogenology 50:699-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00175-7
  7. Butler ST. 2014. Nutritional management to optimize fertility of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Animal 8 Suppl 1:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000834
  8. Celeghini EC, de Arruda RP, de Andrade AF, Nascimento J, Raphael CF. 2007. Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 42:479-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00810.x
  9. Chaveiro A, Machado L, Frijters A, Engel B, Woelders H. 2006. Improvement of parameters of freezing medium and freezing protocol for bull sperm using two osmotic supports. Theriogenology 65:1875-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.10.017
  10. Correa JR, Pace MM, Zavos PM. 1997. Relationships among frozen-thawed sperm characteristics assessed via the routine semen analysis, sperm functional tests and fertility of bulls in an artificial insemination program. Theriogenology 48:721-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00296-3
  11. Correa JR and Zavos PM. 1994. The hypoosmotic swelling test: its employment as an assay to evaluate the functional integrity of the frozen-thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenology 42:351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90280-1
  12. Diskin MG. Review: semen handling, time of insemination and insemination technique in cattle. Animal 2018;12(s1):s75-s84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000952
  13. Farrell PB, Presicce GA, Brockett CC, Foote RH. 1998. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computerassisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 49:871-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3
  14. Harrison RA and Vickers SE. 1990. Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 88:343-352. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0880343
  15. Hu CH, Zhuang XJ, Wei YM, Zhang M, Lu SS, Lu YQ, Yang XG, Lu KH. 2017. Comparison of mitochondrial function in boar and bull spermatozoa throughout cryopreservation based on JC-1 staining. Cryo Letters 38:75-79.
  16. Januskauskas A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2003. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology 60:743-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00050-5
  17. Jepson A, Arlt J, Statham J, Spilman M, Burton K, Wood T, Poon WCK, Martinez VA. 2019. High-throughput characterisation of bull semen motility using differential dynamic microscopy. PLoS One 14:e0202720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202720
  18. Johnson MS, Senger PL, Allen CH, Hancock DD, Alexander BM, Sasser RG. 1995. Fertility of bull semen packaged in .25- and .5-milliliter french straws. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1914-1919. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7371914x
  19. Kang SS, Cho SR, Kim UH, Park CS, Kim HC, Chung KY, Lee SD, Jang SS, Jeon G, Kim S, Lee MS, Yang BC. 2016. Analysis of epididymal sperm from Korean native bull (Hanwoo) aged at 8 and 15 months before freezing and after thawing. J. Emb. Trans. 31:109-116. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2016.31.2.109
  20. Kang SS, Lee MS, Kim UH, Lee SD, Yang BC, Yang BS, Cho SR. 2019. Effect of Optixcell and Triladyl extenders on frozenthawed sperm motilities and calving rates following artificial insemination in Hanwoo. Korean. J. Agric. Sci. 46:195-204. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190009
  21. Kasai T, Ogawa K, Mizuno K, Nagai S, Uchida Y, Ohta S, Fujie M, Suzuki K, Hirata S, Hoshi K. 2002. Relationship between sperm mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm motility, and fertility potential. Asian J. Androl. 4:97-103.
  22. Kathiravan P, Kalatharan J, Edwin MJ, Veerapandian C. 2008. Computer automated motion analysis of crossbred bull spermatozoa and its relationship with in vitro fertility in zona-free hamster oocytes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 104:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.01.002
  23. Layek SS, Mohanty TK, Kumaresan A, Parks JE. 2016. Cryopreservation of bull semen: evolution from egg yolk based to soybean based extenders. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 172:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.04.013
  24. Lima FS, Risco CA, Thatcher MJ, Benzaquen ME, Archbald LF, Santos JE, Thatcher WW. 2009. Comparison of reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows bred by natural service or timed artificial insemination. J. Dairy Sci. 92:5456-5466. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2197
  25. Lopez-Gatius F. 2012. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 77:1029-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.014
  26. Meyers S, Bulkeley E, Foutouhi A. 2019. Sperm mitochondrial regulation in motility and fertility in horses. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 54 Suppl 3:22-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13461
  27. Moce E, Lavara R, Vicente JS. 2010. Effect of cooling rate to 5 ℃, straw size and farm on fertilizing ability of cryopreserved rabbit sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45:e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01507.x
  28. Morrell JM, Nongbua T, Valeanu S, Lima Verde I, Lundstedt-Enkel K, Edman A, Johannisson A. 2017. Sperm quality variables as indicators of bull fertility may be breed dependent. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 185:42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.001
  29. Morris GJ. 2006. Rapidly cooled human sperm: no evidence of intracellular ice formation. Hum. Reprod. 21:2075-2083. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del116
  30. Nagata MB, Egashira J, Katafuchi N, Endo K, Ogata K, Yamanaka K, Yamanouchi T, Matsuda H, Hashiyada Y, Yamashita K. 2019. Bovine sperm selection procedure prior to cryopreservation for improvement of post-thawed semen quality and fertility. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 10:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0395-9
  31. Pace MM and Graham EF. 1974. Components in egg yolk which protect bovine spermatozoa during freezing. J. Anim. Sci. 39:1144-1149. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1974.3961144x
  32. Senger PL, Mitchell JR, Almquist JO. 1983. Influence of cooling rates and extenders upon post-thaw viability of bovine spermatozoa packaged in .25- and .5-ml French straws. J. Anim. Sci. 56:1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5661261x
  33. Stevenson JS, Higgins JJ, Jung Y. 2009. Pregnancy outcome after insemination of frozen-thawed bovine semen packaged in two straw sizes: a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 92:4432-4438. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2304
  34. Valergakis GE, Arsenos G, Banos G. 2007. Comparison of artificial insemination and natural service cost effectiveness in dairy cattle. Animal 1:293-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731107340044
  35. Vishwanath R and Shannon P. 2000. Storage of bovine semen in liquid and frozen state. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:23-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00153-6
  36. Yang BC, Kang SS, Park CS, Kim UH, Kim HC, Jeon GJ, Kim S, Lee SD, Lee HJ, Cho SR. 2015. Motility, fertilizability and subsequent embryonic development of frozen-thawed spermatozoa derived from epididymis in Hanwoo. J. Emb. Trans. 30:271-276. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2015.30.4.271
  37. Yang DH, Standley NT, Xu ZZ. 2018. Application of liquid semen technology under the seasonal dairy production system in New Zealand. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 194:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.01.004