Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Model for the Development of Tools for Math Activities & it's Application

수학체험교구 개발 모형 및 이를 적용한 최대공약수 교구 개발 연구

  • Suh, Bo Euk (Department of Mathematics Education, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2020.11.25
  • Accepted : 2020.12.22
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a basic study to effectively develop a mathematics experience object, an important tool and educational tool in mathematics education. Recently, as mathematics education based on action theory is emphasized, various mathematics experience objects are being developed. It is also used through various after-school activities in the school. However, there are insufficient cases in which a mathematics experience teaching tools is developed and used as a tool for explaining mathematics concepts in mathematics classrooms. Also, the mathematical background of the mathematics experience teaching tools used by students is unclear. For this reason, the mathematical understanding of the toolst for mathematics experience is also very insufficient. Therefore, in this study, a development model is proposed as a systematic method for developing a mathematics experience teaching tools. Also, in this study, we developed 'the Great Common Divisor' mathematics experience teaching tool according to the development model. Through the model proposed through this study and the actual mathematics experience teaching tool, the development of various tools for mathematical experience will be practically implemented. In addition, it is expected that various tools for experiencing mathematics based on mathematical foundations will be developed.

본 연구는 수학교육에서 중요한 수단이자 교육적 도구인 수학체험교구를 체계적으로 개발하기 위한 기초연구이다. 최근 활동이론(action theory)에 근거한 수학교육이 강조되면서 다양한 수학체험교구가 개발되고 교육현장에서 다양한 비교과활동을 통해 활용되고 있지만, 실제 수학수업에서 개념을 설명하기 위한 도구로 수학체험교구가 개발되어 활용되는 사례는 부족한 실정이다. 특히, 수학과 교육과정에 부합되고, 수학적 근거가 명확한 체험교구는 체계적으로 개발되지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 수학체험교구를 개발하기 위한 체계적인 방법으로 체험교구 개발 모형을 제안한다. 또한 제안한 개발 모형에 따라 최대공약수 체험교구를 개발하였다. 본 연구를 통해 제안된 모형과 실제 구현된 체험교구를 통해 다양한 수학체험교구의 개발이 실제적으로 실행되고, 수학적 기초에 근거한 수학체험교구가 다양하게 개발될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (1992). 6th Revised National Curriculum of Mathematics, Ministry of Education Notice 1992-19.
  2. Ministry of Education (1997). 7th Revised National Curriculum of Mathematics, Ministry of Education Notice 1997-15.
  3. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised National Curriculum of Mathematics, Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74
  4. Ministry Of Education & Human Resources Development (2006). 2007 Revised National Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice 2006-75.
  5. Kim, K. W., Do. H. K. (2010). Development of mathematical tools for measuring the Geumgang Ratio, East Asian Mathematical Journal, 26(2), 281-299.
  6. Kim, N. H. (2008). School mathematics and teaching tools for pre-service teachers and teachers, Seoul: KyungMoonSa.
  7. Lee, K. H., Jung, H. Y., Kang, W., Ahn, W., & Back, D. H. (2017). Suggestion and application of didactical principles for using mathematical teaching aids, Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2017.31.2.203
  8. Lim, C. I. (2000). Effects of event-oriented instructional design strategies for cyber course development, Journal of Educational Technology, 16(4), 156-173.
  9. Lim, C. I., Kim, M. K., & Kim, Y. J. (2005). A developmental study on the paper-based rapid prototyping methodology for Web-based instruction, Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.21.1.3
  10. Jung, D. K. (2001). Significance and analyzing episode on using geoboards in mathematics classroom, School Mathematics, 3(2), 447-473.
  11. Choi, C. W. (2014). Math education and educational tools, Seoul: KyungMoonSa.
  12. Artigue, M. (2001). What can we learn from educational research at the university level?. In The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level(207-220). Springer Netherlands.
  13. Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using Manipulatives to Teach Elementary Mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1-6.
  14. Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Harvard Univ. Press.
  15. Dienes, Z. P. (1964). Building up Mathematics(2nd ed.). Hutchinson Educational Ltd..
  16. Dorsey, L. T., Goodrum, D. A, & Schwen, T. M. (1997) Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm. In Dills, C. & Romiszowski, A. J. (Ed.), Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  17. Haspekian, M. (2005). An "instrumental approach" to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: the case of spreadsheets. International journal of computers for mathematical learning, 10(2), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-005-0395-z
  18. Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313401
  19. Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: vol. I. induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  20. Saidu, S., & Bunyamin, S. (2016). Effects of Geoboard and Geographical Globe on Senior Secondary School Students' Performance in Mathematics in Kaduna State. Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 4(1), 140-148.
  21. Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B.(1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298246
  22. van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing Geometric Thinking through Activities that Begin with Play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(1), 310-316. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.5.6.0310