DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synthesis of Nano-Sized Cu Powder by PVA Solution Method and Thermal Characteristics of Sintered Cu Powder Compacts

PVA 용액법을 통한 나노 Cu 분말합성 및 소결체의 열적 특성

  • Oh, Bok-Hyun (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Ma, Chung-Il (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jin (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University)
  • 오복현 (국립목포대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 마충일 (국립목포대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이상진 (국립목포대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.25
  • Accepted : 2020.02.06
  • Published : 2020.02.27

Abstract

Effective control of the heat generated from electronics and semiconductor devices requires a high thermal conductivity and a low thermal expansion coefficient appropriate for devices or modules. A method of reducing the thermal expansion coefficient of Cu has been suggested wherein a ceramic filler having a low thermal expansion coefficient is applied to Cu, which has high thermal conductivity. In this study, using pressureless sintering rather than costly pressure sintering, a polymer solution synthesis method was used to make nano-sized Cu powder for application to Cu matrix with an AlN filler. Due to the low sinterability, the sintered Cu prepared from commercial Cu powder included large pores inside the sintered bodies. A sintered Cu body with Zn, as a liquid phase sintering agent, was prepared by the polymer solution synthesis method for exclusion of pores, which affect thermal conductivity and thermal expansion. The pressureless sintered Cu bodies including Zn showed higher thermal conductivity (180 W/m·K) and lower thermal expansion coefficient (15.8×10-6/℃) than did the monolithic synthesized Cu sintered body.

Keywords

References

  1. W. Zhou, D. Yu, C. Min, Y. Fu and X. Guo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 112, 1695 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29602
  2. D. R. Lee, J. Korean Ceram. Soc., 16, 1861 (2014).
  3. K. Matsubara, H. Kuroki, N. Sawai and Y. Takahara, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. Mater., 73, 211 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2320/jinstmet.73.211
  4. K. M. Shu and G. C. Tu, Mater. Sci. Eng., 349, 236 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00788-8
  5. M. Gui, S. B. Kang and K. Euh, Scripta Mater., 52, 51 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.028
  6. V. V. Rao, M. V. Krishna Murthy and J. Nagaraju, Compos. Sci. Technol., 64, 2459 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.009
  7. M. Chmielewski and W. Weglewski, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.: Tech. Sci., 61, 507 (2013).
  8. J. Tian and K. Shobu, J. Mater. Sci., 39, 1309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jmsc.0000013890.01343.0c
  9. K. M. Lee, D. K. Oh, W. S. Choi, T. Weissgarber and B. Kieback, J. Alloys Compd., 434, 375 (2007).
  10. G. A. Slack, R. A. Tanzilli, R. O. Pohl and J. W. Vandersande, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 48, 641 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(87)90153-3
  11. A. Silzars, S. Keck and K. Aghajanian, Ceramic Reinforced Materials, p.221, 12th International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium, IEEE/ISHM '92 IEMT Symp., Germany (1992).
  12. A. L. Loeb, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 37, 96 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.1954.tb20107.x
  13. P. Chen, G. Luo, Q. Shen, M. Li and L. Zhang, Mater. Design, 46, 101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.034