구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.21-28
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

부착형 치주 창상 피복재가 치주수술 후 동통 및 치유에 미치는 효과에 관한 임상 연구

A clinical study on the effect of attachable periodontal wound dressing on postoperative pain and healing

  • 민한슬 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 강대영 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이성조 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 윤세영 (대전보건대학 화장품과학과) ;
  • 박정철 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 조인우 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Min, Han-Seul (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kang, Dae-Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Yun, Sei-Young (Department of Cosmetic Science, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.07
  • 심사 : 2020.02.21
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 치주포대는 감염 위험을 줄이고 치유를 증대 시킨다는 연구들이 있다. 본 연구는 치주 수술 후 부착형 창상 피복재의 사용이 치유 및 수술 만족도에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 치주 수술이 필요한 환자 28명을 대상으로 상악 또는 하악의 양측 사분면에 치주 수술을 시행하였다. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)를 이용해 술 후 동통, 출혈, 식이 불편감, 지각 과민을 평가하고 추가적으로 작열감과 수술 만족도에 관해 평가하였다. 결과: 수술 후 동통, 출혈, 식이 불편감에 관한 VAS 평균 값은 창상 피복재 유무에 따라 각각; 동통: 2.82, 3.96 (P = 0.002), 출혈: 1.61, 2.54 (P = 0.008), 식이 불편감: 2.82, 4.18 (P < 0.001)로 창상 피복재를 적용한 그룹에서 불편감이 적었으며, 통계적으로 유의하였다. 작열감, 지각 과민과 창상 피복재 적용 유무 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 수술 만족도는 75%에서 창상 피복재를 사용한 경우 높았다. 결론: 본 연구의 결과에 따르면, 창상 피복재의 사용유무와 작열감, 지각 과민과의 통계적 유의성은 없었으나 창상 피복재를 사용한 경우 술 후 동통, 출혈, 식이 불편감이 적었다.

Purpose: After periodontal surgery, studies have found that the use of periodontal wound dressing reduces the risk of wound infection and increases healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of attachable periodontal wound dressing on the healing and patient satisfaction after periodontal flap surgery. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients requiring periodontal surgery underwent periodontal flap surgery on both quadrants of maxilla or mandible. Postoperative pain, bleeding, dietary discomfort and hypersensitivity in relation to attachable periodontal wound dressing was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Additional survey on frequency of burning sensation and overall satisfaction rates were assessed. Results: VAS mean values for pain, bleeding, and dietary discomfort depending on the presence and absence of attachable wound dressing were; pain: 2.82, 3.96 (P = 0.002), bleeding: 1.61, 2.54 (P = 0.008), dietary discomfort: 2.82, 4.18 (P < 0.001), respectively. Test groups with attachable wound dressing reported significantly lower rates of discomfort. No significant difference was observed in burning sensation and hypersensitivity related with wound dressing. Satisfaction was higher in 75% of patients who received wound dressing. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, patients who received attachable periodontal wound dressing reported less postoperative pain, bleeding, and dietary discomfort. There was no statistical significance related to the use of wound dressing with burning sensation and hypersensitivity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ward A. Inharmonious cusp relation as a factor in periodontoclasia. J Am Dent Assoc 1923;10:471-81. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1923.0089
  2. Linghorne WJ, O'Connell DC. The therapeutic properties of periodontal cement pack. J Can Dent Assoc 1949;15:199-205.
  3. Mann JB, Crane AB, Kaplan H. Pyorrhea alveolus: histopathology and results of radical surgical treatment. Dent Cosmos 1934;76:432.
  4. Ward AW. Postoperative care in the surgical treatment of pyorrhea. J Am Dent Assoc 1929;16:635-40. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1929.0083
  5. Orban B. Indications, technique and postoperative management of gingivectomy in the treatment of the periodontal pocket. J Am Dent Assoc 1941;12:89-95. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1925.0007
  6. Bae SB, Lim SB, Chung CH. A Comparative study of clinical effects following periodontal surgery with and without dressing. J Korean Acad Periodontol 1999;29:693-701. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.1999.29.3.693
  7. Checchi L, Trombelli L. Postoperative pain and discomfort with and without periodontal dressing in conjunction with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash after apically positioned flap procedure. J Periodontol 1993;64:1238-42. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.12.1238
  8. Greensmith AL, Wade AB. Dressing after reverse bevel flap procederes. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01244.x
  9. Stahl SS, Witkin GJ, Heller A, Brown R Jr. Gingival healing. III. The effects of periodontal dressing on gingivectomy repair. J Periodontol 1969;40:34-37. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1969.40.1.34
  10. Baer PN, Sumner CF 3rd, Miller G. Periodontal dressings. Dent Clin North Am 1969;13:181-91.
  11. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, Elian N, Tarnow D. Flap advancement: practical techniques to attain tension-free primary closure. J Periodontol 2009;80:4-15. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080344
  12. Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the visual analogue scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993;13:15-24.
  13. Philip BK. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale. Anesth Analg 1990;71:710. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199012000-00027
  14. Singer AJ, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr. Ability of patients to accurately recall the severity of acute painful events. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:292-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01310.x
  15. Checchi L, Trombelli L. Postoperative pain and discomfort with and without periodontal dressing in conjunction with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash after apically positioned flap procedure. J Periodontol 1993;64:1238-42. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.12.1238
  16. Heaney TG, Appleton J. The effect of periodontal dressings on the healthy periodontium. J Clin Periodontol 1976;3:66-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01852.x
  17. Sachs HA, Farnoush A, Checchi L, Joseph CE. Current status of periodontal dressings. J Periodontol 1984;55:689-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.12.689