Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Legal Commentary Information Services Based on the Usage Patterns of Legal Information Sources

법률정보원 이용행태에 기반한 주석서 정보서비스에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2020.02.25
  • Accepted : 2020.03.21
  • Published : 2020.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The court has the responsibility to determine the final interpretation of the law. The court hands down final decisions on personal disputes and conflicts between individuals and the state. Legal commentaries will stay true to their intention of providing diverse legal theories and enabling a unified legal interpretation only when law practitioners are allowed to discuss in depth laws, cases, and legal theories within the boundaries set by commentary authors. If law practitioners include the latest laws, cases, and legal theories as well as their opinions to existing commentaries in their judicial roles and legal studies, they will be able to obtain a unified legal interpretation without referring to other legal literature.

법률에 대한 최종 해석 권한은 법원에 있다. 법원은 개인과 개인의 분쟁, 개인과 국가 사이의 법률적 다툼에 대하여 최종적인 판단을 내린다. 사건의 당사자나 대리인들은 쟁점사항에 대하여 같은 법조문을 놓고 다른 법률해석을 주장하더라도, 궁극적으로 서로 다른 법률해석은 통일된 방향으로 변화되어야 한다. 주석서의 견해에 대하여 법률가들이 다양한 의견을 나누고 새로운 법령, 판례, 법이론 등을 확인하는 과정을 통해 법률해석에 통일을 이룰 수 있다. 법률가가 재판업무 및 법학연구를 위하여 주석서를 활용하는 과정에서 최신의 법령과 판례, 법이론의 현재와 법률가의 다양한 의견을 추가하여 활용할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Min-Koo (2003). Unified Court - The 21st century open trial court with judicial information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  2. Kwak, Yoon-Jik (1992). Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  3. Kim, Kwang-Jin (1996). A study on the user behavior of legal information by legal practitioners. Graduate School of Sung Kyun Kwan University, Department of Library & Information Science.
  4. Kim, Na-Won, & Park, Ji-Hong (2009). Exploring medical doctors' medical information seeking behaviors. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 435-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.435
  5. Kim, Nam-Hee (2009). A study on service model of law library based on library 2.0. Graduate School of Information Science Soongsil University, Department of Knowledge Management.
  6. Kim, Min-Gyu (2013). A study on information use attitudes of legal information service users. Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  7. Kim, Jung-Suk (2010). Studying law school students' information search process related to schoolwork. Sung kyun kwan University, Library and Information Science.
  8. Kim, Zeung-Han (1973). (Theory․Case) Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Korea Institute Judicial Administrative.
  9. Kim, Ji-Hyun (2015). A study on the lawyer's legal information seeking behaviors for the law practice. The Graduate School Hansung University, Major in Library and Information Science, Deparment of Library and Information Science.
  10. Kim, Hwang-Woo (2012). A study of the information seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School, Chonbuk National University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  11. Moon, Yong-Ho (1998). Informatization and its impact on Judicial Practice (The present status and the future views about search for legal informations). Judicial Materials, 79, 303-304.
  12. Lee, Jee-Yeon (2006). An overview of developing & applying information use behavior models. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 5-10.
  13. Jun, Gyung-Gun (2004). Lectures on the law information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  14. Jong, Sang-Jo (2007). Copyright law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  15. Jong, Sang-Jo, & Park Seong Soo (2010). Patent law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  16. Ju, Min-Ji (2013). Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  17. Choi, Mi-soon (2007). A review of the research trends on the information seeking behavior of legal professionals. DOSEOGWAN, 62(2), 25-30.
  18. Han, Seung-Hee, & Lee Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 17-22.
  19. Chancellor, R. (2010). Legal information seeking in a time-constrained environment: A conceptual model for lawyers. International Journal of Legal Information, 38(3), 282-294. https//doi:10.1017/S0731126500005886
  20. Chancellor, R. (2015). Getting it from the source: What librarians think about lawyer search behavior. Law Library Journal, 107(2), 287-295.
  21. Choo. (1998). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Cole, C., Carol C. Kuhlthau. (2000). Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: How experts and value. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 103-116.
  23. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4-5), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158901500406
  24. Hainsworth, Melody May (1992). Information-seeking behavior of judge of the florida district courts of appeal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Florida State University, USA.
  25. Hong, M. J. (1997). Information needs and research behavior of legal professionals in Korea. Annual Review of Library and Information Science, 26, 291-331.
  26. Kadli, Jayadev H; Hanchinal, Veeresh B. (2015). Information seeking behaviour of law students in the changing digital environment. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.1.8099
  27. Leckie, Gloria J., Pettigrew, Karen E., & Sylvain, Christian (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 66(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.1086/602864
  28. Makri, S. (2008). A study of lawyers' information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University College London. Retrieved from https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/2337/1/MakriPhD.pdf
  29. Makri, S., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From ellis’s model to design. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.001
  30. Otike, Japhet (1999). The information needs and seeking habits of lawyers in england: A pilot study. The International Information & Library Review, 31(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.1999.10762486
  31. Rai, P. (2013). Information seeking behavior of legal researcher towards use of electronic legal resource: a study. Proceedings of the 9th International CALIBER, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, March 21-23, 62-73.
  32. Solomon, Y., Bronstein, J. (2016). Serendipity in legal information seeking behavior, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2015-0056
  33. Sutton, S. (1994). The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: an exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<186::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-F
  34. Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Information-seeking behaviour of law faculty at central law college, salem. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/282
  35. Vale, M. E. (1988). Information structure and the information seeking behavior of lawyers. Unpublished Doctoral disseration, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  36. Wilkinson, M. A. (2001). Information sources used by lawyers in problem-solving: An empirical exploration. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00082-2
  37. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science, 3(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576
  38. Winter, S. (2008). Law firm libraries in the 21st century. Legal Information Management, 8(1), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669608000066