DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction

  • Shin, Dong-Seong (Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Carroll, Christopher P. (Department of Brain & Spine Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth) ;
  • Elghareeb, Mohammed (Department of Neurosurgery, South Valley University) ;
  • Hoh, Brian L. (Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida) ;
  • Kim, Bum-Tae (Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.02.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.19
  • Published : 2020.03.01

Abstract

In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15-25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Keywords

References

  1. Alderazi YJ, Shastri D, Kass-Hout T, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD : Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke Res Treat 2014 : 415653, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/415653
  2. Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, Delgado-Rodriguez M : Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 73 : 193-199; discussion 199-200, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000430297.17961.f1
  3. Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, Kallmes DF, Shapiro M, Moran CJ, et al. : Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 80 : 40-48, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw014
  4. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, et al. : Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267 : 858-868, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120099
  5. Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Saatci I, et al. : Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 127 : 81-88, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311
  6. Bender MT, Colby GP, Jiang B, Lin LM, Campos JK, Xu R, et al. : Flow diversion of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms: a single-institution series of 59 cases. Neurosurgery 84 : 206-216, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy076
  7. Bender MT, Lin LM, Colby GP, Lubelski D, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, et al. : P2Y12 hyporesponse (PRU>200) is not associated with increased thromboembolic complications in anterior circulation pipeline. J Neurointerv Surg 9 : 978-981, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012618
  8. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J, et al. : Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 1150-1155, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2907
  9. Bhogal P, Martinez Moreno R, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, Henkes H, Perez MA : Use of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery. J Neurointerv Surg 9 : 283-289, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012648
  10. Bhogal P, Perez MA, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, Henkes H, Fischer S : Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diverters: a single-center experience and review of 56 patients. J Neurointerv Surg 9 : 471-481, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012781
  11. Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, Salvaggio K, Riina HA, Gobin YP : Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 61 : 460-468; discussion 468-469, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000290890.62201.A9
  12. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, Mariniello G, Caranci F, Brunetti A, et al. : Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 28 : 365-375, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400915602803
  13. Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Siddiqui AH, Boccardi E, Cekirge S, et al. : Risk factors for ischemic complications following pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37 : 1673-1678, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4807
  14. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF : Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 44 : 442-447, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.112.678151
  15. Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M : Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 5 : e12492, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012492
  16. Cagnazzo F, Cappucci M, Dargazanli C, Lefevre PH, Gascou G, Riquelme C, et al. : Treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39 : 1100-1106, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5615
  17. Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, Scrivano E, Ceratto R, Lylyk P, et al. : Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32 : 27-33, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2398
  18. Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Yang S, Bovenzi CD, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, et al. : Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 45 : 54-58, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038
  19. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Phillips JL, Starke RM, Hasan D, Wu C, et al. : A single pipeline embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 1562-1566, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3957
  20. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Starke RM, Gonzalez LF, Randazzo C, Hasan D, et al. : Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 44 : 2150-2154, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785
  21. Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Whiting A, Yang S, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, et al. : Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 122 : 1498-1502, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS14411
  22. Chitale R, Gonzalez LF, Randazzo C, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser R, et al. : Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery 71 : 679-691; discussion 691, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260fe86
  23. Chiu AH, Cheung AK, Wenderoth JD, De Villiers L, Rice H, Phatouros CC, et al. : Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 1728-1734, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4329
  24. Chong W, Zhang Y, Qian Y, Lai L, Parker G, Mitchell K : Computational hemodynamics analysis of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters: correlation with clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 136-142, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3790
  25. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Leker RR, Itshayek E : Delayed complications after flow-diverter stenting: reactive in-stent stenosis and creeping stents. J Clin Neurosci 21 : 1116-1122, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.010
  26. Colby GP, Bender MT, Lin LM, Beaty N, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, et al. : Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 9 : 679-685, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012946
  27. Colby GP, Lin LM, Caplan JM, Jiang B, Michniewicz B, Huang J, et al. : Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience. J Neurointerv Surg 8 : 279-286, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011769
  28. Colby GP, Lin LM, Gomez JF, Paul AR, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, et al. : Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience. J Neurointerv Surg 5 : 237-246, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010299
  29. Colby GP, Lin LM, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL : Utilization of the Navien distal intracranial catheter in 78 cases of anterior circulation aneurysm treatment with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 5 Suppl 3 : iii16-iii21, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010692
  30. Colby GP, Lin LM, Nundkumar N, Jiang B, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, et al. : Radiation dose analysis of large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysm treatment with the pipeline embolization device versus traditional coiling techniques. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 380-384, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011193
  31. Connolly ES Jr : International study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 121 : 1022-1023, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.10.JNS131485
  32. Cruz JP, Chow M, O'Kelly C, Marotta B, Spears J, Montanera W, et al. : Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 603-608, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3065
  33. Darsaut TE, Bing F, Salazkin I, Gevry G, Raymond J : Flow diverters can occlude aneurysms and preserve arterial branches: a new experimental model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 2004-2009, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3075
  34. De Vries J, Boogaarts J, Van Norden A, Wakhloo AK : New generation of flow diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 44 : 1567-1577, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434
  35. Delgado Almandoz JE, Crandall BM, Scholz JM, Fease JL, Anderson RE, Kadkhodayan Y, et al. : Last-recorded P2Y12 reaction units value is strongly associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurring up to 6 months after treatment in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 128-135, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3621
  36. Delgado Almandoz JE, Kadkhodayan Y, Crandall BM, Scholz JM, Fease JL, Tubman DE : Variability in initial response to standard clopidogrel therapy, delayed conversion to clopidogrel hyper-response, and associated thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 6 : 767-773, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010976
  37. Di Maria F, Pistocchi S, Clarencon F, Bartolini B, Blanc R, Biondi A, et al. : Flow diversion versus standard endovascular techniques for the treatment of unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 2325-2330, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4437
  38. Diaz O, Gist TL, Manjarez G, Orozco F, Almeida R : Treatment of 14 intracranial aneurysms with the FRED system. J Neurointerv Surg 6 : 614-617, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010917
  39. Ferns SP, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Rinkel GJ, van Rijn JC, Bipat S, et al. : Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 40 : e523-e529, 2009
  40. Fifi JT, Brockington C, Narang J, Leesch W, Ewing SL, Bennet H, et al. : Clopidogrel resistance is associated with thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing neurovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34 : 716-720, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3405
  41. Fiorella D, Hsu D, Woo HH, Tarr RW, Nelson PK : Very late thrombosis of a pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 67(3 Suppl Operative) : onsE313-onsE314; discussion onsE314, 2010
  42. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al. : Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 1 : 56-65, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis.2009.000083
  43. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK : Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 62 : 1115-1120; discussion 1120-1121, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e
  44. Girdhar G, Andersen A, Pangerl E, Jahanbekam R, Ubl S, Nguyen K, et al. : Thrombogenicity assessment of pipeline flex, pipeline shield, and FRED flow diverters in an in vitro human blood physiological flow loop model. J Biomed Mater Res A 106 : 3195-3202, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36514
  45. Goh C, Churilov L, Mitchell P, Dowling R, Yan B : Clopidogrel hyperresponse and bleeding risk in neurointerventional procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34 : 721-726, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3418
  46. Gonzalez NR, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Murayama Y, Vinuela F : Challenges in the endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62 : 1324-1335, 2008
  47. Griessenauer CJ, Ogilvy CS, Foreman PM, Chua MH, Harrigan MR, Stapleton CJ, et al. : Pipeline embolization device for small paraophthalmic artery aneurysms with an emphasis on the anatomical relationship of ophthalmic artery origin and aneurysm. J Neurosurg 125 : 1352-1359, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.12.jns152499
  48. Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, Richling B : Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery 45 : 793-803; discussion 803-804, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199910000-00013
  49. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G : Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 75 : 8-14, 1991 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.1.0008
  50. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Dion J, Lylyk P, Berenstein A, et al. : Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 77 : 515-524, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.4.0515
  51. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V : Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 75 : 1-7, 1991 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.1.0001
  52. Hagen MW, Girdhar G, Wainwright J, Hinds MT : Thrombogenicity of flow diverters in an ex vivo shunt model: effect of phosphorylcholine surface modification. J Neurointerv Surg 9 : 1006-1011, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012612
  53. Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, Nelson PK, Siddiqui A, Jabbour P, et al. : Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg 12 : 62-66, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091
  54. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service : Notification of Ministtry of health and welfare: Flow diverter stent embolization device (No. 2014-191). Available at : http://www.hira.or.kr/bbsDummy.do?brdBltNo=5482&brdScnBltNo=5484&pgmid=HIRAA020002000100
  55. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators : Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 339 : 1725-1733, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199812103392401
  56. Jo KI, Yang NR, Jeon P, Kim KH, Hong SC, Kim JS : Treatment outcomes with selective coil embolization for large or giant aneurysms : prognostic implications of incomplete occlusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61 : 19-27, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.0101.018
  57. Kabbasch C, Mpotsaris A, Behme D, Dorn F, Stavrinou P, Liebig T : Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms-the more, the better? A single-center retrospective observational study. J Vasc Interv Neurol 9 : 14-20, 2016
  58. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafe A, Cekirge S, et al. : International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 108-115, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4111
  59. Karsy M, Guan J, Brock AA, Amin A, Park MS : Emerging technologies in flow diverters and stents for cerebrovascular diseases. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17 : 96, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0805-3
  60. Kim BM, Shin YS, Baik MW, Lee DH, Jeon P, Baik SK, et al. : Pipeline embolization device for large/giant or fusiform aneurysms: an initial multicenter experience in Korea. Neurointervention 11 : 10-17, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.10
  61. Kim LJ, Tariq F, Levitt M, Barber J, Ghodke B, Hallam DK, et al. : Multimodality treatment of complex unruptured cavernous and paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery 74 : 51-61; discussion 61; quiz 61, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000192
  62. Kim TG, Kwon O, Shin YS, Sung JH, Koh JS, Kim BT : Endovascular treatments performed collaboratively by the Society of Korean Endovascular Neurosurgeons members : a nationwide multicenter survey. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 62 : 502-518, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0216
  63. Klisch J, Turk A, Turner R, Woo HH, Fiorella D : Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32 : 627-632, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2571
  64. Kocer N, Islak C, Kizilkilic O, Kocak B, Saglam M, Tureci E : Flow redirection endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 120 : 1158-1171, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442
  65. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, Parker G, Millar J, Goddard AJ, et al. : Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32 : 20-25, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2370
  66. Lanzino G, Crobeddu E, Cloft HJ, Hanel R, Kallmes DF : Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 2158-2161, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3207
  67. Le Quellec S, Bordet JC, Negrier C, Dargaud Y : Comparison of current platelet functional tests for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel response. A review of the literature. Thromb Haemost 116 : 638-650, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1160/TH15-11-0870
  68. Lee JY, Cho YD, Kang HS, Han MH : Healing of aneurysm after treatment using flow diverter stent : histopathological study in experimental canine carotid side wall aneurysm. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 63 : 34-44, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0067
  69. Lin LM, Colby GP, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL : Ultra-distal largebore intracranial access using the hyperflexible Navien distal intracranial catheter for the treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies: a technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 6 : 301-307, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010772
  70. Lin LM, Colby GP, Jiang B, Uwandu C, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, et al. : Classification of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity: a predictor of procedural complexity in pipeline embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 628-633, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011298
  71. Lin N, Brouillard AM, Keigher KM, Lopes DK, Binning MJ, Liebman KM, et al. : Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 808-815, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011320
  72. Lin N, Brouillard AM, Krishna C, Mokin M, Natarajan SK, Sonig A, et al. : Use of coils in conjunction with the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 76 : 142-149, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579
  73. Lin N, Lanzino G, Lopes DK, Arthur AS, Ogilvy CS, Ecker RD, et al. : Treatment of distal anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 79 : 14-22, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001117
  74. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, et al. : Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64 : 632-642; discussion 642-643; quiz N6, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65
  75. Mahboobani NR, Chong WH, Lam SS, Siu JC, Tan CB, Wong YC : Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow re-direction endoluminal device - a single centre experience with short-term follow-up results. Neurointervention 12 : 11-19, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2017.12.1.11
  76. Martinez-Galdamez M, Gil A, Caniego JL, Gonzalez E, Barcena E, Perez S, et al. : Preliminary experience with the pipeline flex embolization device: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 748-751, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011385
  77. Martinez-Galdamez M, Lamin SM, Lagios KG, Liebig T, Ciceri EF, Chapot R, et al. : Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 11 : 396-399, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014204
  78. Martinez-Galdamez M, Perez S, Vega A, Ruiz P, Caniego JL, Barcena E, et al. : Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device: a case series of 30 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg 8 : 396-401, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011669
  79. Meckel S, McAuliffe W, Fiorella D, Taschner CA, Phatouros C, Phillips TJ, et al. : Endovascular treatment of complex aneurysms at the vertebrobasilar junction with flow-diverting stents: initial experience. Neurosurgery 73 : 386-394, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000431472.71913.07
  80. Meyers PM, Coon AL, Kan PT, Wakhloo AK, Hanel RA : SCENT trial. Stroke 50 : 1473-1479, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024135
  81. Mohlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Jestaedt L, Stampfl S, Schonenberger S, Ringleb PA, et al. : The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 1155-1161, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4251
  82. Mohlenbruch MA, Kizilkilic O, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Baltacioglu F, Islak C, Bendszus M, et al. : Multicenter experience with FRED Jr flow redirection endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms in small arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38 : 1959-1965, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5332
  83. Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A : The "remodelling technique" in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 3 : 21-35, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/159101999700300103
  84. Murthy SB, Shah J, Mangat HS, Stieg P : Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device: newer applications and technical advances. Curr Treat Options Neurol 18 : 16, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-016-0399-0
  85. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D : The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32 : 34-40, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2421
  86. Nossek E, Chalif DJ, Chakraborty S, Lombardo K, Black KS, Setton A : Concurrent use of the pipeline embolization device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy. J Neurosurg 122 : 904-911, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141259
  87. Park MS, Albuquerque FC, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Abla AA, et al. : Critical assessment of complications associated with use of the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 652-659, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011265
  88. Park MS, Kilburg C, Taussky P, Albuquerque FC, Kallmes DF, Levy EI, et al. : Pipeline embolization device with or without adjunctive coil embolization: analysis of complications from the IntrePED registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37 : 1127-1131, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4678
  89. Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, Zarzour H, et al. : Off-label uses of the Pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 42 : E4, 2017
  90. Pereira VM, Kelly M, Vega P, Murias E, Yilmaz H, Erceg G, et al. : New pipeline flex device: initial experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 920-925, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347
  91. Petr O, Brinjikji W, Cloft H, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G : Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37 : 1106-1113, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4699
  92. Petr O, Coufalova L, Bradac O, Rehwald R, Glodny B, Benes V : Safety and efficacy of surgical and endovascular treatment for distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 100 : 557-566, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.134
  93. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, Aggour M, et al. : Feasibility, complications, morbidity, and mortality results at 6 months for aneurysm treatment with the flow re-direction endoluminal device: report of SAFE study. J Neurointerv Surg 10 : 765-770, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013559
  94. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, Piotin M : Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 43 : 1032-1038, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.636019
  95. Potts MB, Shapiro M, Zumofen DW, Raz E, Nossek E, DeSousa KG, et al. : Parent vessel occlusion after pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms of the anterior circulation. J Neurosurg 127 : 1333-1341, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.jns152638
  96. Puffer RC, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G : Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 116 : 892-896, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS111612
  97. Puffer RC, Piano M, Lanzino G, Valvassori L, Kallmes DF, Quilici L, et al. : Treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms with flow diversion: results in 44 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 948-951, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3826
  98. Rajah G, Narayanan S, Rangel-Castilla L : Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 42 : E2, 2017
  99. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF : Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 2331-2339, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4438
  100. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF : Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 58 : 171-177, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4
  101. Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, Geyik S, Cekirge HS : Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 1436-1446, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3246
  102. Sadasivan C, Cesar L, Seong J, Rakian A, Hao Q, Tio FO, et al. : An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 40 : 952-958, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.533760
  103. Sadasivan C, Fiorella D : Preliminary in vitro angiographic comparison of the flow diversion behavior of evolve and pipeline devices. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019 [Epub ahead of print]
  104. Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF, Piepgras DG, Chu CP, O'Fallon WM, Whisnant JP : The poor prognosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg 82 : 791-795, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0791
  105. Shapiro M, Becske T, Sahlein D, Babb J, Nelson PK : Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: a literature survey of treatment and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33 : 159-163, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2719
  106. Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI : Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 71 : E509- E513; discussion E513, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e318258e1f8
  107. Sonmez O, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G : Deconstructive and reconstructive techniques in treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 1293-1298, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4360
  108. Steinberg GK, Drake CG, Peerless SJ : Deliberate basilar or vertebral artery occlusion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Immediate results and long-term outcome in 201 patients. J Neurosurg 79 : 161-173, 1993 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.2.0161
  109. Sturiale CL, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G : Endovascular treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: singlecenter experience and a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34 : 2317-2320, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3629
  110. Tan LA, Keigher KM, Munich SA, Moftakhar R, Lopes DK : Thromboembolic complications with pipeline embolization device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg 7 : 217-221, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111
  111. Tanweer O, Raz E, Brunswick A, Zumofen D, Shapiro M, Riina HA, et al. : Cavernous carotid aneurysms in the era of flow diversion: a need to revisit treatment paradigms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 2334-2340, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4081
  112. Taschner CA, Vedantham S, de Vries J, Biondi A, Boogaarts J, Sakai N, et al. : Surpass flow diverter for treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38 : 582-589, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5029
  113. Texakalidis P, Bekelis K, Atallah E, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour P : Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device for patients with intracranial aneurysms and antiplatelet therapy: a systematic literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 161 : 78-87, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.003
  114. U.S. Food and Drug Administration : Instructions for Use (IFU): PipelineTM Embolization Device. Available at : https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/P100018c.pdf
  115. U.S. Food and Drug Administration : Surpass Streamline Flow Diverter - P170024. Available at : https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/recently-approved-devices/surpass-streamline-flow-diverter-p170024
  116. U.S. Food and Drug Administration : Pipeline Flex Embolization Device - P100018/S015. Available at : https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/recently-approved-devices/pipeline-flex-embolization-devicep100018s015
  117. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M : Endovascular treatment of large and giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30 : 12-18, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1267
  118. Vedantam A, Rao VY, Shaltoni HM, Mawad ME : Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 76 : 173-178; discussion 178, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595
  119. Velioglu M, Kizilkilic O, Selcuk H, Kocak B, Tureci E, Islak C, et al. : Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with silk stent. Neuroradiology 54 : 1355-1365, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1051-7
  120. Yan Y, Zhu D, Tang H, Huang Q : Safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for aneurysm in small cerebral vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery 115 : 54-64, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.009
  121. Yao X, Ma J, Li H, Shen H, Lu X, Chen G : Safety and efficiency of flow diverters for treating small intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 45 : 11-21, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060516671600
  122. Zhou G, Su M, Yin YL, Li MH : Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 42 : E17, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450

Cited by

  1. Use of dual-energy computed tomography post endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm vol.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_41_2021
  2. Clinical Interrogation of Mandatory Insertion of Central Venous Catheter for Clipping Surgery of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: A Propensity Score Matched Study vol.146, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.106
  3. Challenges in Using the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery for Revascularization of the Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery: A Microsurgical Anatomic Study vol.150, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.067
  4. Endovascular treatment of type 1 and type 4 non-saccular aneurysms of cerebral arteries - a single-Centre experience vol.27, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019920988204
  5. Comparative Analysis of Feasibility of the Retrograde Suction Decompression Technique for Microsurgical Treatment of Large and Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms vol.64, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0066
  6. Design and Analysis of a Biodegradable Polycaprolactone Flow Diverting Stent for Brain Aneurysms vol.8, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8110183