Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatio-Temporal Patterns of a Public Bike Sharing System in Seoul - Focusing on Yeouido District -

서울시 공공자전거 공유시스템(PBSS)의 시공간적 이용 패턴 분석 - 서울시 여의도동을 중심으로 -

  • Yun, Seung-yong (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Min, Kyung-hun (Environmental Science and Landscape Architecture Course, Chiba University) ;
  • Ko, Ha-jung (Korea Safety Health Environment Foundation)
  • 윤승용 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 민경훈 (일본 국립치바대학교 녹지환경과학코스) ;
  • 고하정 ((재)숲과나눔)
  • Received : 2019.12.10
  • Accepted : 2020.02.14
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Various policies and studies regarding use of PBSS (Public Bike Sharing System) and Programs (PBSP) have been conducted worldwide as the number systems or programs has increased. Although various phenomena and demands have been generated by the use of PBSS in everyday life, the majority of research and the policies in South Korea have been implemented focused on commuting life. The purpose of this study aimed to understand various PBSS demands using PBSS usage data in 2018 in the Yeouido districts through classifying usage patterns and analyzing features. The rental stations were classified into three types based on weekday/weekend usage rates. The usage of Yeouido's PBSS accounted for 4.3% of the total usage in Seoul Metropolitan City, while the number of PBSS rental stations accounted for 2% of all rental stations in the Seoul urban areas. Rental stations with a higher weekday utilization rates showed high utilization rates in all four seasons and were mainly distributed in work and residential areas. Other stations showed a concentrated usage pattern in spring (April-May) and autumn (September-October) seasons, and their locations were close to the entrance of nearby parks. Besides, renting and returning were often concentrated at certain rental stations for high weekend utilization as compared to the pattern of high weekday usage. Therefore, PBSS management and programs should be operated to reflect various usage demands rather than uniform PBSS operations. The result of this study is meaningful to provide basic data for effective PBSS operation by monitoring the demand for PBSS usage in spatio-temporal terms.

세계적으로 공공자전거 공유시스템(PBSS) 및 프로그램(PBSP)이 증가하면서 다양한 정책과 연구들이 진행되었다. 오늘날 PBSS가 일상생활에서 밀접하게 이용되면서 다양한 현상과 수요가 발생하고 있으나, 아직 국내에서는 통근통학에 초점을 맞춘 정책과 연구들이 주로 이루어지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 다양한 PBSS 수요를 파악하기 위해서 서울시 여의도를 대상으로 2018년도 한 해 동안 발생한 PBSS 이용 데이터를 분석하여 이용 패턴을 유형화하고 특징을 분석하였다. 서울시에서 제공하는 PBSS 자료를 기반으로 주중/주말 이용률에 따라 대여소를 3개 유형으로 구분하여 각각의 특징을 분석하였다. 여의도의 PBSS는 이용량의 경우에는 서울시 전체에서 4.3%, 대여소 개소수의 경우에는 2%에 해당하는 것으로 나타났다. 주중 이용률이 높은 대여소는 다른 유형에 비하여 사계절 모두 높은 이용률을 보였으며, 업무 및 주거지역에 주로 분포하였다. 주말 이용률이 높은 대여소의 경우에는 봄(4~5월)과 가을(9~10월)에 집중된 이용 패턴이 나타났으며, 대여소에서 공원입구까지의 거리가 가까운 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 주중 이용률이 높은 패턴에 비해서 동일한 대여소를 통해 대여 및 반납이 이루어진 경우가 많고, 특정 대여소에 PBSS 이용이 집중된 쏠림현상이 나타나고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서, 획일적인 PBSS 운영보다는 대여소별로 다양한 이용수요와 현상을 반영한 PBSS의 관리와 프로그램이 운영되어야 할 것이다. 본 연구결과는 PBSS 이용에 대한 수요를 유형에 따라 시공간적으로 파악함으로써 효과적인 PBSS 운영이 이루어질 수 있도록 기초자료를 제공하는 것에 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Borgnat, P., P. Abry, P. Flandrin, C. Robardet, J. Rouquier and E. Fleury(2011) Shared bicycles in a city: A signal processing and data analysis perspective, Advances in Complex Systems 14(3): 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911002950
  2. Buck, D. and R. Buehler(2012) Bike lanes and other determinants of capital bike share trips. In: Paper Presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, Washington DC.
  3. Buck, D., R. Buehler, P. Happ, B. Rawls, P. Chung and N. Borecki (2013) Are bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? A first look at short-term users, annual members, and area cyclists in the Washington, D. C., Region. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2387(1): 112-119. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-13
  4. Chardon, C. M., G. Caruso and I. Thomas(2016) Bike-share rebalancing strategies, patterns, and purpose. Journal of Transport Geography 55: 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.003
  5. Davis, A. and N. A. Cavill(2007) Cycling and Health; What's the evidence?. Cycling England.
  6. Demaio, P.(2009) Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation 12(4):41-56. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3
  7. Do, M. S. and Y. S. Noh(2014) Analysis of the affecting factors on the bike-sharing demand focused on Daejeon City. Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers 34(5): 1517-1524. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.5.1517
  8. El-Assi, W., M. Salah Mahmoud and K. Nurul Habib(2017) Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: A station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation 44: 589-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z
  9. Faghih-Imani, A. and N. Eluru(2016) Incorporating the impact of spatio-temporal interactions on bicycle sharing system demand: A case study of New York CitiBike system. Journal of Transport Geography 54: 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.008
  10. Fishman, E., S. Washington, N. Haworth and A. Watson(2015) Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 71: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.021
  11. Froehlich, J., J. Neumann and N. Oliver(2009) Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling. IJCAI 2009 Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 11-17.
  12. Guo, Y., J. Zhou, Y. Wu and Z. Li(2017) Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo China. PLoS One 12: e0185100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185100
  13. Heinen, E., K. Maat and B. Wee(2011) The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16(2): 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
  14. Jang, J. M., T. H. Gim and M. Y. Lee(2016) A study on the Seoul public bikes use characteristics: A case of the districts of Yeouido and Sangam. The Seoul Institute 17(4): 77-91.
  15. Kaltenbrunner, A., R. Meza, J. Grivolla and J. Codina(2010) Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6(4): 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2010.07.002
  16. KITA(2018) Recent trends in China's shared bicycle industry and implications(report). Korea International Trade Association: Chengdu Center.
  17. KOTI(2018) A Study on Revision of Master Plan for Sustainable National Transportation Logistics. Korea. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
  18. Maurer, L. K.(2012) Feasibility study for a bicycle sharing program in Sacramento, California. In: Paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  19. Moon, H. G., D. P. Kim, S. H. Choi and J. O. Kwon(2014) Classification analysis of the physical environment of bicycle road: Focused on Chang Won city, Kyung Nam province, S. Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 28(3): 365-373. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.3.365
  20. O'Brien, O., J. Cheshire and M. Batty(2014) Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. Journal of Transport Geography 34: 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.007
  21. Parkin, J., M. Wardman and M. Page(2008) Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 35:93-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5
  22. Sa, K. E. and S. G. Lee(2018) Analysis of physical characteristics affecting the usage of public bike in Seoul, Korea: Focused on the different influences of factors by distance to bike station. Journal of Korea Planning Association 53(6): 39-59. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2018.11.53.6.39
  23. Shaheen, S. A., S. Guzman and H. Zhang(2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. 2010 Transportation Research Recode 2143(1):159-167.
  24. Wood, J., A. Slingsby and J. Dykes(2011) Visualizing the dynamics of London's bicycle hire scheme. Cartographica 46(4): 239-251. https://doi.org/10.3138/carto.46.4.239
  25. Zhang, Y., T. Thomas, M. Brussel and A. Maarseveen(2016) Expanding bicycle-sharing systems: Lessons learnt from an analysis of usage. PLoS One 11(12): e0168604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168604
  26. Zhou, X.(2015) Understanding spatiotemporal patterns of biking behavior by analyzing massive bike sharing data in Chicago. PLoS One 10(10): e0137922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137922
  27. City Lab, https://www.citylab.com/city-makers-connections/bikeshare/accessed 2020.1.9.
  28. Korea National Spatial Data Infrastructure Portal Open API, http://openapi.nsdi.go.kr/ accessed 2020.1.9.
  29. Metro Bike, http://www.metrobike.net/ accessed 2019.8.7.
  30. Seoul Open Data Plaza, http://data.seoul.go.kr/ accessed 2019.11.24.