The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.75-82
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study

  • Degirmenci, Kubra (Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University) ;
  • Saridag, Serkan (Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Kocaeli University)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.13
  • 심사 : 2020.03.04
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant retained restorations on to titanium specimens after different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty disc shaped specimens were used. They were divided into three groups considering the surface treatments (no treatment, sandblasting, and oxygen plasma treatment). Water contact angle of specimens were determined. The specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n=10) according to applied cement types: polycarboxylate cement (Adhesor Carbofine-AC), temporary zinc oxide free cement (Temporary CementZOC), non eugenol provisional cement for implant retained prosthesis (Premier Implant Cement-PI), and non eugenol acrylic-urethane polymer based provisional cement for implant luting (Cem Implant Cement-CI). Shear bond strength values were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test and Regression analysis were used to statistical analyze the results. RESULTS. Overall shear bond strength values of luting cements defined in sandblasting groups were considerably higher than other surfaces (P<.05). The cements can be ranked as AC > CI > PI > ZOC according to shear bond strength values for all surface treatment groups (P<.05). Water contact angles of surface treatments (control, sandblasting, and plasma treatment group) were 76.17° ± 3.99, 110.45° ± 1.41, and 73.80° ± 4.79, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that correlation between the contact angle of different surfaces and shear bond strength was not strong (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The retentive strength findings of all luting cements were higher in sandblasting and oxygen plasma groups than in control groups. Oxygen plasma treatment can improve the adhesion ability of titanium surfaces without any mechanical damage to titanium structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Worni A, Gholami H, Marchand L, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N. Retrievability of implant-supported crowns when using three different cements: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:22-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4119
  2. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:260-5.
  3. Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1304-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01587.x
  4. Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings. J Prosthodont 2013;22:112-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00912.x
  5. Canullo L, Cocchetto R, Marinotti F, Oltra DP, Diago MP, Loi I. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1492-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12589
  6. Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:649-54. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00008
  7. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.
  8. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:450-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.020
  9. Wadhwani C, Chung KH. Bond strength and interactions of machined titanium-based alloy with dental cements. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:660-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.015
  10. Rodrigues DC, Valderrama P, Wilson TG, Palmer K, Thomas A, Sridhar S, Adapalli A, Burbano M, Wadhwani C. Titanium corrosion mechanisms in the oral environment: A retrieval study. Materials (Basel) 2013;6:5258-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6115258
  11. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resinmodified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 2008;24:1702-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.005
  12. Nematollahi F, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M. Cement selection for cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A literature review. J Prosthodont 2016;25:599-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12361
  13. Jugdev J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lynch E. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:784-90. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3167
  14. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA, Kumar Sivakumar JS, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, Divya K. Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017;9:S154-60. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_146_17
  15. Elsaka SE. Effect of surface pretreatments on the bonding strength and durability of self-adhesive resin cements to machined titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:113-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60026-8
  16. Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:36-41.
  17. Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:367-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60149-2
  18. Al Hamad KQ, Al Rashdan BA, Abu-Sitta EH. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:638-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02011.x
  19. Larsson Wexell C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Tengvall P, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to implants with different surface characteristics. Int J Biomater 2013;2013:412482. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/412482
  20. Duske K, Koban I, Kindel E, Schroder K, Nebe B, Holtfreter B, Jablonowski L, Weltmann KD, Kocher T. Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:400-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01853.x
  21. Tseng WY, Hsu SH, Huang CH, Tu YC, Tseng SC, Chen HL, Chen MH, Su WF, Lin LD. Low pressure radio-frequency oxygen plasma induced oxidation of titanium--surface characteristics and biological effects. PLoS One 2013;8:e84898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084898
  22. Henningsen A, Smeets R, Hartjen P, Heinrich O, Heuberger R, Heiland M, Precht C, Cacaci C. Photofunctionalization and non-thermal plasma activation of titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1045-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2186-z
  23. Ozer F, Pak-Tunc E, Esen Dagli N, Ramachandran D, Sen D, Blatz MB. Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:340-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.340
  24. Ozcan M, Matinlinna J. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based cements to base and noble alloys: How to condition and why? J Adhes Dent 2015;17:372-3. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34787
  25. Seker E, Kilicarslan MA, Deniz ST, Mumcu E, Ozkan P. Effect of atmospheric plasma versus conventional surface treatments on the adhesion capability between self-adhesive resin cement and titanium surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:249-56. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.249
  26. Vogelsang A, Ohl A, Steffen H, Foest R, Schroder K, Weltmann KD. Locally resolved analysis of polymer surface functionalization by an atmospheric pressure argon microplasma jet with air entrainment. Plasma Process Polym 2010;7:16-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.200900091
  27. Wadhwani CP, Pineyro AF. Implant cementation: clinical problems and solutions. Dent Today 2012;31:56, 58, 60-2; quiz 63, 54.
  28. Reddy AK, Kambalyal PB, Patil SR, Vankhre M, Khan MY, Kumar TR. Comparative evaluation and influence on shear bond strength of incorporating silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in orthodontic adhesive. J Orthod Sci 2016;5:127-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.192115
  29. Sun J, Forster AM, Johnson PM, Eidelman N, Quinn G, Schumacher G, Zhang X, Wu WL. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dent Mater 2011;27:972-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.003
  30. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70203-9
  31. Gumus HO, Kurtulus IL, Kuru E. Evaluation and comparison of the film thicknesses of six temporary cements before and after thermal cycling. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:1656-61.
  32. Naumova EA, Roth F, Geis B, Baulig C, Arnold WH, Piwowarczyk A. Influence of luting materials on the retention of cemented implant-supported crowns: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2018;11. pii: E1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101853
  33. El-Helbawy NG, El-Hatery AA, Ahmed MH. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:555-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4355
  34. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
  35. Hagaman EW, Chen B, Jiao J, Parsons W. Solid-state 17O NMR study of benzoic acid adsorption on metal oxide surfaces. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2012;41:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2011.12.001
  36. Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, Hirayama H, Garefis PD, Petridis H. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:569-74.
  37. Labriaga W, Song SY, Park JH, Ryu JJ, Lee JY, Shin SW. Effect of non-thermal plasma on the shear bond strength of resin cements to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:408-14. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.6.408
  38. do Prado M, da Silva EM, Marques JDN, Gonzalez CB, Simao RA. The effects of non-thermal plasma and conventional treatments on the bond strength of fiber posts to resin cement. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42:125-33. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.125
  39. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dent Mater J 2012;31:249-55. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-210
  40. Lumkemann N, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:3941-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z
  41. Matthes R, Jablonowski L, Holtfreter B, Gerling T, von Woedtke T, Kocher T. Fibroblast growth on zirconia ceramic and titanium disks after application with cold atmospheric pressure plasma devices or with antiseptics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:809-18. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7285
  42. Elias AB, Simao RA, Prado M, Cesar PF, Botelho Dos Santos G1, Moreira da Silva E5. Effect of different times of nonthermal argon plasma treatment on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:485-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.025