Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Improved Interactive Mode of Delete in Mobile Phone's Full Keyboard and Its Usability

휴대폰의 풀 키보드에서 향상된 대화식 삭제 모드 및 사용성에 관한 연구

  • Guo, Haoyue (Dept. of Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University) ;
  • Pan, Younghwan (Dept. of Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University) ;
  • Luo, Tao (Dept. of Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University)
  • 곽호월 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 스마트경험디자인학원) ;
  • 반영환 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 스마트경험디자인학원) ;
  • 루오타오 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 스마트경험디자인학원)
  • Received : 2020.02.28
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The text has always been an important recording channel for the development of human civilization. The delete text function is essential. The current method of deleting text is to "press" the delete button to complete the operation. It does not meet the user's need to delete large amounts of text. This article focuses on a new interactive approach to this problem. We consider problems and find solutions from the perspective of zero-order position control and first-order rate control. Through experimental design analysis and comparison, the new keyboard interaction method greatly improves efficiency and user experience. This article hopes to evaluate the usability of the new keyboard through usability studies.

문본은 인류문명발전의 중요한 기록방식이다.문본의 삭제기능은 매우중요하다.현재 문본삭제의 방법은 '삭제'버튼을 누르는 것으로 완성한다.이는 대량적인 문본삭제의 고객요구에 맞지않다.본문은 중점적으로 이문제를 해결하는 새로운 인터렉티브의 방식에대해 소개했다.우리는 이문제를 고려하며 제0위치공제와 제1속도공제중에서 해결방안을 찾았다.분석과 실험걸계를 통하여 새로운 키보드 인터렉비트의 방법의 효율과 고객의 체험을 크게 향상시켰다.본문은 가용성 연구를 통해 새로운 키보드의 가용성을 평가하기를 바라는바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Milanesi C. (2016). Voice Assistant Anyone? Yes Please, but Not in Public! [Online]. https://creativestrategies.com/voice-assistant-anyone-yes-please-but-not-in-public/
  2. Marco Romano, Luca Paolino, Genoveffa Tortora & Giuliana Vitiello. (2014). The Tap and Slide Keyboard: A New Interaction Method for Mobile Device Text Entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(12), 935-945. DOI : 10.1080/10447318.2014.924349
  3. Human Interface Guidelines. (2020). [Online]. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interfaceguidelines/ios/user-interaction/gestures/
  4. Pang Xiaoyue, GUO Rui-zhen, YAO Nai-lang, YU Jia-lin, YU Shi-xian, WANG Ci & GAO Zai-feng. (2014.03). Human factor studies on gestural interaction: Past, present, and future[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(3), 243-251. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2014.03.007.
  5. Norman, D. A. (2010). The way I see it: Natural user interfaces are not natural. Interactions, 17(3), 6. DOI : 10.1145/1744161.1744163
  6. Luo Tao. (2018). Designing the beauty of interactions. [Brochure]. Beijing China. Tsinghua University Press.
  7. Mirkowicz, M. & Grodner, G. (2018). Jakob Nielsen's Heuristics in Selected Elements of Interface Design of Selected Blogs. Social Communication, 4(2), 30-51. DOI : 10.2478/sc-2018-0013
  8. Dai Dai. (2018). Starting from "gesture interaction", analyze the principles behind product design. [Online]. https://www.uisdc.com/gesture-interaction-analysis-product
  9. Bevan, N., Carter, J. & Harker, S. (2015). ISO 9241-11 Revised: What Have We Learnt About Usability Since 1998? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 143-151. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_13
  10. Klug, B. (2017). An Overview of the System Usability Scale in Library Website and System Usability Testing. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience, 1(6). DOI : 10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.602
  11. Neal Krause, & Elena Bastida. (2009). Religion, suffering, and health among older Mexican Americans, 114-123. DOI : 10.1016/j.jaging.2008.11.002
  12. Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19. London:Routledge. DOI : 10.4324/9780203180990
  13. DeCoster J. & Claypool H. (2004). Data analysis in SPSS. Retrieved October, 2, 2015. [Online]. http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html
  14. Bewick, V., Cheek, L. & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 9: One-way analysis of variance. Crit Care 8, 130. DOI : 10.1186/cc2836
  15. AlGhannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A. & Albustan, L. A. (2017). Towards a Standard Arabic System Usability Scale: Psychometric Evaluation using Communication Disorder App. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799-804. DOI : 10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
  16. James R. Lewis. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577-590. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
  17. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. & Newell, A. (2018). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. DOI : 10.1201/9780203736166