한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제37권2호
  • /
  • Pages.75-81
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Autoligation Technique for Castration in Small Breed Dogs

  • Kim, Jong-In (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Jeong, Soon-Wuk (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.02
  • 심사 : 2020.02.25
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of autoligation techniques for castrating healthy male small breed dogs. Forty dogs were divided into four groups, with 10 in each group, based on maturity and the surgical technique used: 1) immature dogs aged less than 1 year, with autoligation of the spermatic cord via a scrotal approach (SAL) as the surgical technique (SAL-IM); 2) mature dogs aged 1 year or older, with the same SAL surgical technique (SAL-M); 3) immature dogs aged less than 1 year, with double ligation of the spermatic cord with an absorbable suture via a prescrotal approach (PDL) as the surgical technique (PDL-IM); and 4) mature dogs aged 1 year or older, with the same PDL surgical technique (PDL-M). The effectiveness of the surgical technique was evaluated by comparing the operating time and complications between these four groups. The significant decreases in operating times were found in SAL-IM and SAL-M compared with those of PDL-IM and PDL-M (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). Regardless of maturity, the SAL surgical technique reduced operating time by approximately 69.5% compared with the PDL surgical technique. When the complication severities were scored, the results showed no significant differences among the four group. The autoligation technique for castration in healthy male small breed dogs is considered to be effective because the operating time consuming is less than conventional techniques.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adin CA. Complications of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2011; 41: 1023-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.05.004
  2. Griffin B, Bushby PA, McCobb E, White SC, Rigdon-Brestle YK, Appel LD, Makolinski KV, Wilford CL, Bohling MW, Eddlestone SM, Farrell KA, Ferguson N, Harrison K, Howe LM, Isaza NM, Levy JK, Looney A, Moyer MR, Robertson SA, Tyson K. The association of shelter veterinarians' 2016 veterinary medical care guidelines for spay-neuter programs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016; 249: 165-188. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.249.2.165
  3. Hamilton KH, Henderson ER, Toscano M, Chanoit GP. Comparison of postoperative complications in healthy dogs undergoing open and closed orchidectomy. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55: 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12266
  4. Hoglund OV, Ingman J, Sodersten F, Hansson K, Borg N, Lagerstedt AS. Ligation of the spermatic cord in dogs with a self-locking device of a resorbable polyglycolic based copolymer - feasibility and long-term follow-up study. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 825-831. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-825
  5. Ingelmo PM, Ferri F, Fumagalli R. Interactions between general and regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2006; 72: 437-445.
  6. Leoci R, Aiudi G, Silvestre F, Lissner EA, Lacalandra GM. Alcohol diluent provides the optimal formulation for calcium chloride non-surgical sterilization in dogs. Acta Vet Scand 2014; 56: 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0062-2
  7. Levy JK, Crawford PC, Appel LD, Clifford EL. Comparison of intratesticular injection of zinc gluconate versus surgical castration to sterilize male dogs. Am J Vet Res 2018; 69: 140-143. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.69.1.140
  8. Mahalingam A, Kumar N, Maiti SK, Sharma AK, Dimri U, Kataria M. Laparoscopic sterilization vs. open method sterilization in dogs: a comparison of two techniques. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2009; 33: 427-436.
  9. Miller KP, Rekers WL, Ellis K, Ellingsen K, Milovancev M. Pedicle ties provide a rapid and safe method for feline ovariohysterectomy. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 18: 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X15576589
  10. Miller KP, Rekers WL, DeTar LG, Blanchette JM, Milovancev M. Evaluation of sutureless scrotal castration for pediatric and juvenile dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018; 253: 1589-1593. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.12.1589
  11. Moldal ER, Eriksen T, Kirpensteijn J, Nodtvedt A, Kristensen AT, Sparta FM, Haga HA. Intratesticular and subcutaneous lidocaine alters the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and heart rate variability in male cats undergoing castration. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013; 40: 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00773.x
  12. Perez TE, Grubb TL, Greene SA, Meyer S, Valdez N, Bingman J, Farnsworth R. Effects of intratesticular injection of bupivacaine and epidural administration of morphine in dogs undergoing castration. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 242: 631-642. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.242.5.631
  13. Son WG, Seo JP, Lee IH. Anesthetic effect of tiletamine, zolazepam, tramadol and medetomidine combination in dogs. In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics Conference. 2008; 25: 181.
  14. Suh SI, Kim TJ, Lee EC, Hyun CB. Effect of medetomidine and combination of medetomidine/tiletamine/zolazepam and medetomidine/tiletamine/zolazepam/tramadol on echocardiographic cardiac contractility in dogs. J Vet Clin 2015; 32: 422-425. https://doi.org/10.17555/jvc.2015.10.32.5.422
  15. Woodruff K, Rigdon-Brestle K, Bushby PA, Wills R, Huston C. Scrotal castration versus prescrotal castration in dogs. Vet Med 2015; 110: 131-135.