Environmental Engineering Research

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.243-250
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-1025(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-968X(eISSN)
대한환경공학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Kinetic modeling of organic and nitrogen removal from domestic wastewater in a down-flow hanging sponge bioreactor

  • Nga, Dinh Thi (Research Institute for Sustainable Development, Hochiminh City University of Natural Resources and Environment) ;
  • Hiep, Nguyen Trung (Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Nong Lam University) ;
  • Hung, Nguyen Tri Quang (Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Nong Lam University)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.05
  • 심사 : 2019.03.23
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) bioreactor was operated for the treatment of domestic wastewater. The Stover-Kincannon model was applied for kinetic evaluation of the reactor performance during the operational period. As a result, the coefficient of determination (R2) for straight lines of effluent concentration from the experimental data and from the predictive data of BOD5; NH4+-N; and TN were 0.9727; 0.9883; and 0.9934, respectively. The calculation of saturation value constant (Umax - g L-1 d-1) and maximum utilization rate constant (KB - g L-1 d-1) were 56.818 and 75.034 for BOD5; 2.960 and 4.713 for NH4+-N; 2.810 and 8.37 for TN, respectively. The study suggests that Stover-Kincannon model can be used for effective evaluation of kinetic removal of BOD5; NH4+-N; and TN from domestic wastewater treated in a DHS bioreactor.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Zhou Z, Shen X, Jiang LM, et al. Modeling of multimode anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic wastewater treatment process at low temperature for process optimization. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;281:644-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.017
  2. Saleh TA, Tuzen M, Sari A. Magnetic activated carbon loaded with tungsten oxide nanoparticles for aluminum removal from waters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017;5: 2853-2860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.038
  3. Saleh TA, Tuzen M, Sari A. Polyamide magnetic palygorskite for the simultaneous removal of Hg(II) and methyl mercury;with factorial design analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 2018;211:323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.050
  4. Tuzen M, Sari A, Saleh TA. Response surface optimization, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for effective removal of rhodamine B by magnetic $AC/CeO_2$ nanocomposite. J. Environ. Manage. 2018;206:170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.016
  5. Saleh TA. Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: A comparison study. Aqua 2015;64:892-903.
  6. Saleh TA. Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies on Hg(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by silica- multiwall carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015;22:16721-16731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4866-z
  7. Saleh TA, Adio SO, Asif M, Dafalla H. Statistical analysis of phenols adsorption on diethylenetriamine-modified activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;182:960-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.242
  8. Javid A, Hassani A, Ghanbari B, Yaghmaeian K. Feasibility of utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor to upgrade and retrofit municipal wastewater treatment plants. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2013;7:963-972.
  9. Metcalf E, Eddy M. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and resource recovery. Vol. 5. New York: Mic Graw-Hill; 2014.
  10. Machdar I, Sekiguchi Y, Sumino H, Ohashi A, Harada H. Combination of a UASB reactor and a curtain type DHS (downflow hanging sponge) reactor as a cost-effective sewage treatment system for developing countries. Water Sci. Technol. 2000;42:83-88.
  11. Mahmoud M, Tawfik A, El-Gohary F. Use of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor as a promising post-treatment system for municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;168:535-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.019
  12. Tandukar M, Ohashi A, Harada H. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale UASB and DHS system and activated sludge process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2007;41:2697-2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.027
  13. Tawfik A, El-Gohary F, Ohashi A, Harada H. The influence of physical-chemical and biological factors on the removal of faecal coliform through down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) system treating UASB reactor effluent. Water Res. 2006;40:1877-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.02.038
  14. Fleifle A, Tawfik A, Saavedra OC, Elzeir M. Treatment of agricultural drainage water via downflow hanging sponge system for reuse in agriculture. Water Supply 2013;13:403-412. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2013.034
  15. Nomoto N, Ali M, Jayaswal K, et al. Characteristics of DO, organic matter, and ammonium profile for practical-scale DHS reactor under various organic load and temperature conditions. Environ. Technol. 2018;39:907-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1316319
  16. Yoochatchaval W, Onodera T, Sumino H, et al. Development of a down-flow hanging sponge reactor for the treatment of low strength sewage. Water Sci. Technol. 2014;70:656-663. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.270
  17. Abyar H, Younesi H, Bahramifar N, Zinatizadeh AA, Amini M. Kinetic evaluation and process analysis of COD and nitrogen removal in UAASB bioreactor. J. Taiwan Instit. Chem. Eng. 2017;78:272-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.06.014
  18. Debik E, Coskun T. Use of the Static Granular Bed Reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:2777-2782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.058
  19. Faridnasr M, Ghanbari B, Sassani A. Optimization of the moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) to control aeration time by kinetic computational modeling: simulated sugar-industry wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;208:149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.047
  20. Kapdan IK. Kinetic analysis of dyestuff and COD removal from synthetic wastewater in an anaerobic packed column reactor. Process Biochem. 2005;40:2545-2550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.11.002
  21. Diamantis V, Aivasidis A. Kinetic analysis and simulation of UASB anaerobic treatment of a synthetic fruit wastewater. Global NEST J. 2010;12:175-180. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.000562
  22. Vital-Jacome M, Buitron G, Moreno-Andrade I, Garcia-Rea V, Thalasso F. Microrespirometric determination of the effectiveness factor and biodegradation kinetics of aerobic granules degrading 4-chlorophenol as the sole carbon source. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016;313:112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.077
  23. Hu Z-H, Yu H-Q, Yue Z-B, Harada H, Li Y-Y. Kinetic analysis of anaerobic digestion of cattail by rumen microbes in a modified UASB reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007;37:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.04.013
  24. Bhunia P, Ghangrekar M. Analysis, evaluation, and optimization of kinetic parameters for performance appraisal and design of UASB reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:2132-2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.053
  25. Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Bucchi G, et al. Trichloroethylene aerobic cometabolism by suspended and immobilized butane-growing microbial consortia: A kinetic study. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;144:529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.006
  26. Hussain A, Dubey SK, Kumar V. Kinetic study for aerobic treatment of phenolic wastewater. Water Resour. Ind. 2015;11:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2015.05.002
  27. Karkare M, Murthy Z. Kinetic studies on agrochemicals wastewater treatment by aerobic activated sludge process at high MLSS and high speed agitation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012;18:1301-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.01.029
  28. Lim J, Vadivelu V. Treatment of agro based industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactor: Performance evaluation and growth kinetics of aerobic biomass. J. Environ. Manage. 2014;146:217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.023
  29. Tamrat M, Costa C, Marquez MC. Biological treatment of leachate from solid wastes: Kinetic study and simulation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012;66:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2012.04.012
  30. Kincannon DF, Stover EL. Design methodology for fixed film reaction-RBCs and biological towers. In: Civil engineering for practicing and design engineers. New York: Pergamon Press;1982.
  31. Yu H, Wilson F, Tay JH. Kinetic analysis of an anaerobic filter treating soybean wastewater. Water Res. 1998;32:3341-3352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00102-X
  32. Hiep NT, Tuyet LTH, Nga DT, Tuan PD. A research on the performance of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor treating domestic wastewater. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2018;56:482-492. https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/56/4/10878
  33. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation. Washington D.C; 2005. p. 75.
  34. Aqualytic. Determining Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V.; 1994; Berlin.
  35. Alighardashi A, Modanlou M, Shervin J. Performance evaluation of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating pulp and paper wastewater in start-up period. Water Prac. Technol. 2015;10:1-9. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2015.001
  36. Yang GF, Feng LJ, Wang SF, Yang Q, Xu XY, Zhu L. Performance and enhanced mechanism of a novel bio-diatomite biofilm pretreatment process treating polluted raw water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;191:271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.033
  37. Hassani AH, Borghei SM, Samadyar H, Ghanbari B. Utilization of moving bed biofilm reactor for industrial wastewater treatment containing ethylene glycol: Kinetic and performance study. Environ. Technol. 2014;35:499-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.834947
  38. Saleh TA. Nanocomposite of carbon nanotubes/silica nanoparticles and their use for adsorption of Pb(II): From surface properties to sorption mechanism. Desal. Water Treat. 2015;57:10730-10744. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1036784
  39. Saleh TA. Simultaneous adsorptive desulfurization of diesel fuel over bimetallic nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;172:2123-2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.208
  40. Amin MM, Khiadani MH, Fatehizadeh A, Taheri E. Validation of linear and non-linear kinetic modeling of saline wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactor with adapted and non-adapted consortiums. Desalination 2014;344:228-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.032
  41. Dey S, Mukherjee S. Kinetic modeling and factorial design for co-biodegradation of phenol and m-cresol for aerobic batch reactor system. Mater. Today Proc. 2016;3:3450-3460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.10.027
  42. Carboneras B, Villasenor J, Fernandez-Morales FJ. Modelling aerobic biodegradation of atrazine and 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid by mixed-cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;243:1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.089
  43. Yang G, Feng L, Wang S, et al. Potential risk and control strategy of biofilm pretreatment process treating raw water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;198:456-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.027
  44. Abbas G, Wang L, Li W, Zhang M, Zheng P. Kinetics of nitrogen removal in pilot-scale internal-loop airlift bio-particle reactor for simultaneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonia oxidation. Ecol. Eng. 2015;74:356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.035
  45. Akhbari A, Zinatizadeh A, Mohammadi P, Mansouri Y, Irandoust M, Isa M. Kinetic modeling of carbon and nutrients removal in an integrated rotating biological contactor-activated sludge system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;9:371-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0040-z
  46. Ni S-Q, Sung S, Yue Q-Y, Gao B-Y. Substrate removal evaluation of granular anammox process in a pilot-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Ecol. Eng. 2012;38:30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.10.013
  47. Tomar S, Gupta SK. Investigating the role of co-substrate-substrate ratio and filter media on the performance of anammox hybrid reactor treating nitrogen rich wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioenerg. 2016;121:310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.07.005
  48. Vandith V, Setiyawan A S, Soewondo P, Bophann P. Kinetics of nutrient removal in an on-site domestic wastewater treatment facility. In: MATEC Web of Conferences; 22 January 2018;04004.
  49. Niu Q, Zhang Y, Ma H, He S, Li YY. Reactor kinetics evaluation and performance investigation of a long-term operated UASB-anammox mixed culture process. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016;108:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.024

피인용 문헌

  1. Physico‐Chemical and Kinetic Evaluation of a Combined Vertical Settler/Self‐Aerated Unit for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse vol.49, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202100147
  2. Biological treatment of saline domestic wastewater by using a down-flow hanging sponge reactor vol.283, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131101
  3. Performance and kinetic modeling of modified attached-growth anoxic-oxic-anoxic reactor for onsite sanitation system treating septic tank effluent vol.27, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2020.617