DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality characteristics and antioxidant capacities of Korean commercial yogurt

시판 호상 요구르트의 품질 특성과 항산화 활성

  • Noh, Young-Hee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Jang, Ah-Soon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Pyo, Young-Hee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sungshin Women's University)
  • 노영희 (성신여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 장아순 (성신여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 표영희 (성신여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.14
  • Accepted : 2019.12.06
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

We investigated the quality characteristics and antioxidant capacities of Korean commercial yogurt. Twenty commercial yogurt samples exhibited a pH of 4.05-4.51, titratable acidity of 0.80-1.45%, viable counts of 6.65-9.39 log CFU/g, and total phenolic content of 0.71-2.92 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry weight (dw). Lactic acid was the major organic acid detected by HPLC with UV detection, and its content was 5.4 times and 46.5 times higher than that of malic acid and citric acid, respectively. The tested commercial yogurt samples exhibited antioxidant potential (1.62-8.95 mM trolox equivalent/g, dw) measured based on scavenging activities of DPPH and ABTS radicals. The average antioxidant potentials of commercial set yogurt containing fruit syrup were significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of cream and plain yogurt. A positive linear correlation was observed between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant capacities, suggesting that phenolic components are likely to contribute significantly to the antioxidant potential of commercial yogurt.

국내에서 시판되는 20종의 호상 요구르트의 품질 특성은 pH 4.05-4.51, 적정산도 0.80-1.45%, 생균수 6.65-9.39 log CFU/g 으로 측정되어 일반적인 호상 요구르트의 품질기준에 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 총 페놀함량은 생크림 요거트(D-2)가 0.71 mg GAE/g으로 가장 낮은 반면, 블루베리(E-2)와 딸기 시럽(A-2, C-1, B-1)이 첨가된 요구르트(2.30-2.92 mg GAE/g)가 가장 높게 측정되었다. 시판 호상 요구르트에 함유된 lactic acid의 함량은 20.38-54.42 mg으로 측정되었으며, 총 유기산 함량의 82.9%를 차지하여 주요 유기산 성분으로 나타났다. 생균수와 젖산 및 총 유기산의 함량이 가장 높은 시료는 그릭 요거트(G-1)로 나타났다. DPPH와 ABTS 라디컬 소거활성으로 측정된 항산화 활성이 가장 높은 시료는 딸기시럽이 첨가된 A-2와 B-1이었으며, 가장 낮은 시료는 플레인 소프트 요거트 F-1이었다. 이들 항산화 측정법과 시료에 함유된 총 페놀함량과의 상관관계는 평균 r=0.4574로 나타나, 호상 요구르트의 항산화 활성은 자체 내 함유된 총 페놀성분의 농도와 밀접한 상관성을 보여 주었다. 따라서 본 연구의 결과는, 소비자 측면에서 항산화 활성과 probiotics의 효능을 동시에 지향하는 요구르트 제품을 선택하고자 할 때 유익한 정보로 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ana M, Rubicelia V, Annia G. Citric acid: A promising copper scavenger. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1133: 47-50 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2018.04.011
  2. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelie ME, Berset C. Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 28: 25-30 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
  3. da Silva BV, Barreira JCM, Oliveira BPP. Natural phytochemicals and probiotics as bioactive ingredients for functional foods: Extraction, biochemistry and protected-delivery technologies. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 50: 144-158 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.007
  4. Doughari JH, Human IS, Nennade S, Ndakidemi PA. Phytochemicals as chemotherapeutic agents and antioxidants. J. Med. Plants Res. 3:172-180 (2009)
  5. Kim MS, Ahn ES, Shin DH. Physico-chemical properties of commercial yogurt in Korea. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 25: 340-344 (1993)
  6. Kim AN, Jung HA. Quality characteristics of curd yogurt supplemented with Jujube hot water extracts. J. East Asian Diet. 23: 69-77 (2013)
  7. Lee JA, Jeon GH, Lim KS, Oh SJ, Park DJ, Imm JY. Quality characteristics of commercial yogurt powder marketed in Korea. Korean J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 32: 157-161 (2014)
  8. Lee MJ, Kim KS, Kim YK, Park JC, Kim HS, Kim KJ. Quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of yogurt added with whole barley flour. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 45: 721-726 (2013) https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2013.45.6.721
  9. Lee JC, Lee KS, Lee JK, Han KH, Oh MJ. Preparation and characteristics of curd yogurt from milk added with purple sweet potato. Korean J. Postharvest Sci. technol. 6: 442-447 (1999)
  10. Lim KS, Heong JW, Oh SJ, Moon YI, Hoh JH. Current market trends and perspectives of probiotics. Curr. Top. Lact. Acid Bact. Probiotics 3: 46-53 (2015) https://doi.org/10.35732/ctlabp.2015.3.2.46
  11. Min HJ. Industrial Economic Fact Reviews. Available from http://www.biznews.or.kr/news/article.html?no=9018. Accessed Jun. 27, 2019.
  12. Nurul FF, Arbakariya BA, Mohd EK, Leonardo RS. Influence of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and bioactive phytochemicals on the formulation of functional yogurt. J. Funct. Foods 48: 387-399 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.039
  13. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evan C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Bio. Med. 26: 1231-1237 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  14. Scherer R, Rybka ACP, Ballus CA, Meinhart AD, Filho JT, Godoy HT. Validation of a HPLC method for simultaneous determination of main organic acids in fruits and juices. Food Chem. 135: 150-154 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.111
  15. Shin KS, Lee JH. Evaluation of quality characteristics in commercial yogurt. Korean J. Food Preserv. 25: 195-204 (2018) https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2018.25.2.195
  16. Singleton VL, Rossi JAJ. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 16: 144-158 (1965)
  17. Sung JM, Choi HY. Effect of mulberry powder on antioxidant activities and quality characteristics of yogurt. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 43: 690-697 (2014) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.5.690
  18. Talha D, Kubra A, Didem S, Hale I, Nihat A. Rice bran improve probiotic viability in yoghurt and provide added antioxidative benefits. J. Funct. Foods 36: 396-403 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.07.019
  19. Tamime AY, Robinson RK. Yoghurt: Science and Technology. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, USA P 175 (1985)
  20. Won JI, Lee JH, Par HI, Cho YU, Lee SK, Oh SK, Han SI, Choi HS. Quality characteristics of commercial semisolid type yogurt in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 47: 1185-1190 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2018.47.11.1185