DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors influencing class flow of dental hygiene students in dental hygiene care process

치위생(학)과 학생의 치위생관리과정 수업몰입 영향요인

  • Cho, Hye-Eun (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kwangju Women's University) ;
  • Chung, Kyung-Yi (Department of Dental Hygiene, Honam University)
  • 조혜은 (광주여자대학교 치위생학과) ;
  • 정경이 (호남대학교 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.24
  • Accepted : 2019.12.22
  • Published : 2020.02.28

Abstract

Objectives: This study provides basic data for developing practical teaching methods enabling efficient execution of the dental hygiene care process. Methods: A total of 197 dental hygiene students experienced in dental hygiene care process in Gwangju and Jeonnam were surveyed from June 1 to August 30, 2019 to study their class flow, professors-student relationships, and class satisfaction level. Post survey, statistical analysis was performed using frequency analysis, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. Results: 1. Class fl ow was high in three lecturers (3.56), four hours per week (3.39), and four hours per week (3.94). Class satisfaction was high in three lecturers (3.99) and four hours per week (3.90) (p<0.05). 2. There was a positive correlation between class flow and professor-student relationship (r=0.519), class fl ow and class satisfaction (r=0.566), and professor-student relationship and class satisfaction (r=0.838) (p<0.01). 3. The factors influencing class fl ow were the number of lecturers (β=0.442), class hours per week (β=-0.397), and class satisfaction (β=0.385). Conclusions: Apart from finding ways to improve class satisfaction for class flow in the dental hygiene care process, efforts are required to increase the number of lecturers and class hours per week for efficient class management. Further research is needed to develop practical teaching methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Darby ML, Walsh MM. Dental hygiene theory and practice. 3rd (ed.), Canada: Saunders; 2010: 1-2.
  2. Moon SE, Kim YJ, Kim SY, Cho HE, Kang HJ, Hong SH, et al. Feasibility study of periodontal treatment of dental hygienists. Seoul: Korean Dental Hygienists Association; 2017: 1-154.
  3. Song YM, Yu SB, Kim MJ. The effects of university students' institutional commitment professor-student interaction, and positive and collaborative learning activities on university students' satisfaction. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2018;18(10):977-95. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.10.977
  4. Kuh GD, Kinzie J, Schuh JH, Whitt EJ. Student success in college: creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005: 88-240.
  5. Ramaley J. Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college (National panel report). Washington, D.C: Association of american colleges and universities; 2002: 22-42.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1990: 1-10.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins; 1996: 1-464.
  8. Kahn PE. Theorising student engagement in higher education. Br Educ Res J 2014;40(6):1005-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3121
  9. Kim SY, Kim DH. The relationship between trust building factors on PE teacher, teacher trust, class satisfaction and physical education attitude. Korean Journal of Sports Science 2014;23(6):959-74.
  10. Astin AW. The impact of dormitory living on student. Educational Record 1973;54(9):204-10.
  11. Kim SH, Chung OB. A study on the perception and the satisfaction with learning on human development and family relations area of the 6th revision of middle school home economics education curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association 1997;9(2):46-67.
  12. Deshields O. Determineants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg's two-factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management 2005;9(2):128-39.
  13. Hwang JY. A study on educational satisfaction of the students in graduate school of interpretation and translation by AMOS structural equation model. Journal of Interpretation & Translation Institute 2015;19(4):115-34.
  14. Shin SY, Kwon SY. The important-satisfaction analysis of educational satisfaction by the student's characteristics. Korea Educational Review 2014;20(1):253-80.
  15. Lee GJ, Lee JM. A study on the factors associated with students' satisfaction with and outcomes of higher education. The Journal of Educational Administration 2015;33(1):105-27.
  16. Kim CH. Development and validation of flow scale for physical education of middle school students. Journal of Korean Association of Sport Pedagogy 2008;15(2):65-81.
  17. Kim MS. A development and validation of an "educational relationship" scale in the context of college education. J Educ Psychol 2016;30(1):27-60. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2016.30.1.02
  18. Harvey L. New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education & Management 2000;6(1):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09050-z
  19. Kwon DB, Oh YJ, Park HM, Son JJ, Song SH. An exploring study on determining factors for college student's degree of educational satisfaction. The Korean Education Research Association 2002;40(3):181-202.
  20. Han ES, Kim JD. An analysis of influential factors on college of education students' academic satisfaction. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 2007;20(3):313-35.
  21. Lee SY. A causal structure analysis of the influences of the learning motivation and the self-determination on the job creativity and the learning satisfaction[Doctoral dissertation]. Seoul: Univ. of Hongik, 2014.
  22. Moon SJ, Ku IY, Choi HY, Ka KH. Study of on- and off-campus clinical practice satisfaction and major satisfaction among dental hygiene students in some regions. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 2014;15(11):6793-803. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.11.6793
  23. Koo HY, Im HS. Comparison of factors influencing satisfaction of clinical practice between associate and bachelor nursing students. Jour. of KoCon.a 2013;13(1):311-21. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.01.311
  24. Min HH. Influencing factors of and satisfaction with clinical practice between college and university dental hygiene students. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2019;19(4):503-13. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190046
  25. Yoo JH. Factors influencing nursing students' flow experience and clinical competency in simulation-based education : based on Jeffries's simulation model[Master's thesis]. Seoul: Univ. of Sungshin, 2016.
  26. Hong KC. Study on relationships between instructional variables and learning-flow. Korean Journal of Thinking Development 2009;5(1):19-44.
  27. Kang MH, Song YH, Park SH. Relationships among metacognition, flow, interactions and problem solving ability in web-based problem based learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2008;12(2):293-315. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2008.12.2.293
  28. Kim EJ. Examining structural relationships among college students' internal and external factors for learning engagement and satisfaction. Asian Journal of Education 2015;16(3):107-29. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.09.16.3.107
  29. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyound boredom and anxiety: experiencing flow in work and play. San Franciso: Josey Bass; 2000: 1-231.