DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The suprafascial course of lower leg perforators: An anatomical study

  • Vaienti, Luca (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato) ;
  • Cottone, Giuseppe (Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, AOU Ospedali Riuniti) ;
  • De Francesco, Francesco (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato) ;
  • Borelli, Francesco (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato) ;
  • Zaccaria, Giovanna (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena) ;
  • Amendola, Francesco (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato)
  • Received : 2019.07.12
  • Accepted : 2020.02.13
  • Published : 2020.03.15

Abstract

Background Perforator mapping has been well described in the literature. Once the suprafascial plane is reached, the course of perforators is considered constant. However, the surgeon must be aware of whether an anastomosis exists between perforators superficially to the fascia, in order to choose the best vessel upon which to base the reconstruction. Our retrospective in vivo anatomical study of lower leg perforator flaps presents the first description of variations in the suprafascial path of perforators, which may influence preoperative flap design. Methods An anatomical study of lower limb perforators was performed on 46 nonconsecutive patients who were referred to our department from June 2012 to October 2018. Reconstruction with perforator-based propeller flaps was planned for each of the patients. In total, 72 perforators were preoperatively identified and surgically isolated. The suprafascial course of each perforator was reported. Results During suprafascial surgical exploration, branching patterns were observed in four perforators. These perforators had been classified as single vessels in the preoperative ultrasonographic analysis. However, after surgical dissection, distal converging branches were noted in two of them. Conclusions Our study is the first description in the literature of suprafascial converging perforators, which might constitute an obstacle to planned reconstruction procedures. Despite the accuracy of preoperative evaluations, anatomical variations were present. Knowledge of suprafascial perforator variations may help surgeons to choose the correct perforator upon which to base a planned flap.

Keywords

References

  1. Soltanian H, Garcia RM, Hollenbeck ST. Current concepts in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136:815e-829e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001807
  2. Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, et al. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: what is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2018;38:109-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30047
  3. Engel H, Lin CH, Wei FC. Role of microsurgery in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127 Suppl 1:228S-238S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182008e12
  4. Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:314-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001891
  5. Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ, et al. The "Gent" consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1378-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000081071.83805.B6
  6. Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, et al. What should define a "perforator flap"? Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2258-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f61824
  7. Niranjan NS, Price RD, Govilkar P. Fascial feeder and perforator-based V-Y advancement flaps in the reconstruction of lower limb defects. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:679-89. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3428
  8. Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, et al. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012;28:595-601. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315786
  9. Feng S, Min P, Grassetti L, et al. A prospective head-to-head comparison of color doppler ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography in the preoperative planning of lower extremity perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137: 335-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001895
  10. Panagiotopoulos K, Soucacos PN, Korres DS, et al. Anatomical study and colour Doppler assessment of the skin perforators of the anterior tibial artery and possible clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1524-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.013
  11. Martin AL, Bissell MB, Al-Dhamin A, et al. Computed tomographic angiography for localization of the cutaneous perforators of the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:792-800. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818cb4
  12. Su W, Lu L, Lazzeri D, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with three- dimensional reconstruction in preoperative perforator flap planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131:80-93.
  13. Miller JR, Potparic Z, Colen LB, et al. The accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in the planning of skin flaps in the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:1221-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199506000-00013
  14. Tang M, Mao Y, Almutairi K, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of perforators of the posterior leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1729-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f376
  15. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Ohta S, et al. The vasculature and clinical application of the posterior tibial perforator-based flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:643-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199210000-00014
  16. Drimouras G, Kostopoulos E, Agiannidis C, et al. Redefining vascular anatomy of posterior tibial artery perforators: a cadaveric study and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 2016;76:705-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000258
  17. Hupkens P, Westland PB, Schijns W, et al. Medial lower leg perforators: an anatomical study of their distribution and characteristics. Microsurgery 2017;37:319-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30076
  18. Vaienti L, Calori GM, Leone F, et al. Posterior tibial artery perforator flaps for coverage of Achilles region defects. Injury 2014;45 Suppl 6:S133-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.037
  19. Georgescu AV. Propeller perforator flaps in distal lower leg: evolution and clinical applications. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39: 94-105. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.94
  20. Ozalp T, Masquelet AC, Begue TC. Septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery relative to the fibula: anatomical basis of the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:54-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0059-7
  21. Gacevic M, Milisavljevic M, Novakovic M, et al. Skin vascularisation field by the ascending branch of the peroneal artery ramus perforans. Vojnosanit Pregl 2011;68:575-82. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP1107575G
  22. Lykoudis EG, Koutsouris M, Lykissas MG. Vascular anatomy of the integument of the lateral lower leg: an anatomical study focused on cutaneous perforators and their clinical importance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:188-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174303
  23. Heitmann C, Khan FN, Levin LS. Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003;19:157-62. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39828
  24. Lu TC, Lin CH, Lin CH, et al. Versatility of the pedicled peroneal artery perforator flaps for soft-tissue coverage of the lower leg and foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:386-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.004
  25. Innocenti M, Menichini G, Baldrighi C, et al. Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2276-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3537-6

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Muscle Exercise on Perforators Flow: A Prospective Cohort Study vol.56, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56070338