로봇학회논문지 (The Journal of Korea Robotics Society)

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.160-168
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-6291(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3961(eISSN)
한국로봇학회 (Korea Robotics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

텔레프레즌스 로봇을 통한 권리행사의 세대간 수용성 격차

Generation Gap of Expected Rights through Telepresence Robots

  • 투고 : 2020.01.02
  • 심사 : 2020.02.04
  • 발행 : 2020.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

There exists a popular belief that the elderly are more conservative than the younger people in acceptability of new technology. This study explores whether the generation gap in technology acceptance exists in the case of using telepresence robots, which project the presence and mobility of remote operator, for the universal purpose of social participation rather than for specific applications. Two groups of senior citizens and undergraduate students in their twenties personally experienced the telepresence robots operation and conducted a survey on how they perceived the social participation of a remote operator mediated by telepresence robot and to what extent the remote operator deserve equal rights to be treated as if one really exists in the local environment. The results show that the elderly have higher expectation on the role and functions of telepresence robots, and more favorable in principle for a remote operator to exercise equal rights by operating telepresence robot. It suggests that the stereotypes, the elderly lag behind younger generation in accepting new technology, is unlikely to fit into the telepresence robot market, for the elderly have more favor and support using telepresence robots as an universal avatar for social participation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Avatar, [Online], http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1, Accessed: Mar 15, 2019.
  2. "2050, population crisis coming," The Korea Economic Daily, [Online], https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2019110436571, Accessed: Nov 4, 2019.
  3. Y.-H. Lee, K. M. Kim, T. T. Tran, and J.-W. Kim, "Development of Robot Contents to Enhance Cognitive Ability for the Elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment," Journal of Korea Robotics Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41-50, Jun, 2016, DOI: 10.7746/jkros.2016.11.2.041.
  4. R. Steele, A. Lo, C. Secombe, and Y. K. Wong, "Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare," International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 788-801, Dec, 2009, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001.
  5. M.-H. Ryu, S. Kim, and E. Lee, "Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user's participation in video UCC services," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 619- 632, May, 2009, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.013.
  6. V. Venkatesh, J.Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no.1, pp. 157-178, Mar., 2012, DOI: 10.2307/41410412.
  7. A.H.S. Chan and K. Chen, "A review of technology acceptance by older adults," Gerontechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2011, DOI: 10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00.
  8. R.W. Berkowsky, J. Sharit, and S.J. Czaja, "Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults," Innovation in Aging, vol. 1, no. 3, Feb, 2018, DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy002.
  9. A. Mahmood, T. Yamamoto, M. Lee, and C. Steggell, "Perceptions and use of gero technology:Implications for aging in place," Journal of Housing for the Elderly, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 104-126, Oct, 2008, DOI: 10.1080/02763890802097144.
  10. C. McCreadie and A. Tinker, "The acceptability of assistive technology to older people," Ageing and Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 91-110, Jan, 2005, DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X0400248X.
  11. K. Arning and M. Ziefle, "Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2904-2927, Nov, 2007, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.005.
  12. S. Mallenius, M. Rossi, V.K. Tuunainen, "Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people - results from a pilot study," 6th Annual Global Mobility Roundtable, Los Angeles, USA, Jun, 2007, [Online], https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4ddd/97c9c58b82667b842a9dd9c10d54e19ade8b.pdf.
  13. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models," Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, Aug, 1989, DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  14. A. D. Nuovo, F. Broz, N. Wang, T. Belpaeme, A. Cangelosi, R. Jones, R. Esposito, F. Cavallo, and P. Dario, "The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly," Intelligent Service Robotics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 109-126, Sep, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s11370-017-0237-6.
  15. M. K. Lee and L. Takayama, "Now, I have a body: uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace," The 29th annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 33-42, 2011, DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1978950.
  16. L. M. Ellison, P. A. Pinto, F. Kim, A. M. Ong, A. Patriciu, D. Stoianovici, H. Rubin, T. Jarrette, and L. R. Kavoussi, "Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery," Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 523-530, Oct., 2004, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.022.
  17. K.W.C. Shin and J.-H. Han, "Qualitative Exploration on Children's Interactions in Telepresence Robot Assisted Language Learning," Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 177-184, Mar., 2017, DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.3.177.
  18. D. Sampsel, G. Bharwani, D. Mehling, and S.Smith, "Robots as faculty: student and faculty perceptions," Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 209-218, Nov., 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.009.
  19. J. Ryall, "A robot named Lucy is lining up to get an iPhone 6S in Australia," Mashable, [Online], https://mashable.com/2015/09/24/robot-iphone-6s, Accessed: 02 09, 2020.
  20. R. van Delden and M. Bruijne, "Telepresence Robots in Daily Life," CTIT, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, Mar., 2017, [Online], https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/telepresence-robots-in-daily-life-technical-report.
  21. I. Bae, "Public Acceptance of Fundamental Rights via a Telepresence Robot and a Video Call Stand in South Korea," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.10, no.4, pp. 503-517, Dec., 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s12369-017-0453-4.
  22. I.-H. Bae and J.-H. Han, "Analysis of the Effect of Physical Conditions of the Elderly on Acceptance of Telepresence Robot," Journal of Creative Information Culture, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 293-301, Dec., 2018, DOI: 10.32823/jcic.4.3.201812.293.
  23. J. M. Beer and L. Takayama, "Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, benefits, and concerns," 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 19-26, Mar., 2011, DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957665.