DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Applicability of Aesthetics of Appropriation for the Discussion on Architectural Plagiarism

건축 표절 논의를 위한 미학의 차용 적용에 관한 연구

  • 김영선 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과) ;
  • 최재필 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.01
  • Accepted : 2020.05.04
  • Published : 2020.05.30

Abstract

It is the juristocracy in architecture to judge the architectural plagiarism by copyright law. The architectural plagiarism should judge by architectural criticism. From the point of the criticism to discuss architectural plagiarism, the study on artistic imitation should be preceding. The current discussion on architectural plagiarism doesn't consider artistic imitation. Therefore, the result of the discussion only focused on whether the building is plagiarizing or not. From the point of architectural criticism, there should be three considerations, which are creation, imitation, and plagiarism. In the study of Aesthetics, it theorized artistic imitation as the appropriation. With the understanding of the appropriation, contemporary art is developing the discourse on plagiarism beyond the boundary of plagiarism fundamentalism. The purpose of this study is to apply the appropriation to the discussion of architectural plagiarism. The study introduces the discourse on architectural plagiarism rather than judging it with copyright law. There so the study categorized the aesthetics standard of appropriation art, then apply it to the architecture cases. The architecture cases subjects of analysis are the glasshouse by Philip Johnson, National Museum of Australia by Howard Raggatt, and the Meiquan 22nd Century in China. At the point of the appropriation theory, the glasshouse is the only architectural appropriation, and others need to apply the evaluation criteria of plagiarism.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkins, R. (1994). ArtSpeak: A Guide to Contemporary Ideas, Movements, and Buzzwords, 1945 to the Present(Park, J. ed.). 7th ed., Seoul: Sigongsa.
  2. Choi, S., & Oh, J. (2013). A Study on Characteristics of 'Architectural Spectacularization' in the Suburban Consumption Area Near Seoul, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 29(5), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.5.151
  3. Choi, W., & Kim, D. (2011). References of Modern Architecture in the Early Works of Rem Koolhaas: Villa Savoye in Villa Dall'Ava and Kusthal, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(4), 155-164.
  4. Chun, M., & Bae, J. (1997). A Study on 'Parody' with it's Methodological Approach to the Formal Composition of Post-modern Architecture, Hong-Ik Faculty Journal, 2(-), 5-29.
  5. Hong, H., & Lee, J. (2014). A Study on the Hommage of Architectural space: Focused on Richard Meier's Architecture, Journal of Art & Design Research, 9(2), 129-138.
  6. Hong, H. (2006). A Study on the roles of Simulacre in Photo-image appropriation, Master Thesis, Hong-Ik University.
  7. Hong, S. (2008). A Legal Study on The Standard of Judgment on The Copyright Infringement of Cinematographic Works. The Institute for Legal Studies, Inha University, 11(2), 85-109.
  8. Hwang, D. (2011). Recherches sur la corrlation architecturale entre Le Corbusier et Richard Meier travers la technique hommage, Etudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France, 36(-), 641-669.
  9. Jo, K. (2009). Relationship between Image and text in Duchamp's . Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 10(5), 475-483.
  10. Kim, J. (2011). Kitsch expression in the contemporary arts and symbolism of the popular arts. Journal Korea Society of Visual Design Forum, 32, 71-86.
  11. Kim, W. (2002). A Study on Appropriation and Repetition of Post-Modernism Art, Thesis, Hong-Ik University, 37-39.
  12. Kim, Y. (2004). Art History of Imitation and Appropriation. Journal of Contemporary Art Studies, (8), 47-77.
  13. Lee, J. (2011). The Appropriation of Images in Works of Art: Legal and Aesthetic Issues Inherent in Postmodernism, Journal of Art & Design Research, 14(1), 52-72.
  14. Lee, J. (2012). The arsthetics of reproduction presented in Richard Hamilton's work, Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 15-35.
  15. Mass, W., Madrazo, F., Ravon A., & Lopez, D. (2015). Copy Paste: The Badass Architectural Copy Guide. 1st ed., Delft, The Why Factory.
  16. Monthly Art. (1999). World Dictionary of Art. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=894218&cid=42642&categoryId=42642
  17. Nam, H. (2015). Theory of plagiarism. 1st ed., Seoul: Heyinamsa, 223.
  18. Nam, H. (2016). Law and the Arts. Journal of Korea Information law, 20(2), 31-68.
  19. Oh, J. (2014). The Aesthetic of Replication in Pop Art. Art History Forum, (38), 125-153.
  20. Park, C. (2019). A Study on the Novels Plagiarism and Copyright Law, Thesis, Chung-Ang University, 9, 110.
  21. Park, J., Lee, H., & Dong, J. (2007). An Analysis of Kitsch on the Exterior of Commercial Buildings: Focus on Psychology of Consumer Patterns in Relation to Commercial Buildings in Song-Do, Incheon, Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 16(4), 12-20.
  22. Posner, R. (2007). The Little Book about Plagiarism. 1st ed., New York, Pantheon Books, 65, 105.
  23. Ryu, M. (2011). A Study on Appropriation Strategy of 1980's Art, Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 24-33, 54, 67.
  24. Shin, J. (2008). A Study on the Appropriation of Postmodern Art, Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 5.
  25. Song, S. (2011). A Study on the Characteristics of Kitsch in Modern Architecture, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(11), 223-230.
  26. Yoon, J. (2016). Some Theoretical Issues on the Plagiarism in Literature, The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea, 21(2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2016.21.2.5
  27. Yoon, M. (2001). A Study of Modern Plastic Arts in the point of Appropriation, Journal of Art & Design Research, 4(-), 93-99.
  28. Yoon, Y. (2013). A Study on Deformation using Appropriating and Compositing Images: Focus on Photography and Painting, Thesis, Konkuk University.