Development and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Sex Education Program Based on Nonviolent Communication Model

비폭력대화(NVC)모델에 근거한 포괄적 성교육 프로그램의 개발 및 평가

  • Received : 2020.03.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.16
  • Published : 2020.05.31


Purpose: Sex education should be given priority to address dating violence. Comprehensive sex education has been developed based on a nonviolent communication model between couples for the smooth resolution of problems with the opposite sex. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply Comprehensive Sex Education for unmarried couples in their 20s-30s and to examine the effects on sex communication, problem-solving communication, and relationship competence. Methods: This study developed a total of six web-based sex education sessions. A comprehensive sex education program combined with nonviolent communication between couples was developed based on the UNESCO Sex Education Guidelines. A pre- and post-equivalence control design was used to provide moderation-based sex education to compare the effects on gender communication, communication dissatisfaction, and relationship development. Results: We developed a comprehensive sex education program for couples that took three minutes per episode, on a web-based basis. Sex communication, problem-solving communication, and love relationship competence showed significant pre- and post-test differences between the experimental and control groups. Conclusion: The program of this study is an attempt to introduce Korea to comprehensive sex education, which has already been shown to be effective through numerous verification processes abroad and will provide assistance in forming future relationships between lovers.



  1. Korean national police agency. "Violence" is not "love."-The National Police Agency runs a "date violence reporting period" for two months [Internet]. nulimang (Korea): Korean national police agency: 2019 [cited 2020 May 18]. Available from:
  2. Korean national police agency. Date violence report period (July to August) Operation Results [Internet]. nulimang (Korea): Korean national police agency; 2019 [cited 2020 May 18]. Available from:
  3. Park AC. A Review of Erikson’s developmental frame-works on human development. The Journal of Social Sciences. 2007;26(2):143-63.
  4. Huh NS. A study on countermeasures and treatment techniques for wife beating. Comparative Social Welfare. 1993;2:277-320.
  5. Eom HJ, Lee JW. Online sex education for college students. Family and Family Therapy. 2011;19(1):127-50.
  6. Cha J, Kim S. The needs of sex education for recovering male alcoholics. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2015;29(2):272-84.
  7. Shin YH, Chun YK, Cho SM, Cho YR. The effects of a sex education program on knowledge related to sexually transmitted diseases and sexual autonomy among university students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005;35(7):1304-13.
  8. World Health Organization. International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2018 May 5]. Available from:
  9. Kramer AS. Framing the debate: the status of US sex education policy and the dual narratives of abstinence-only versus comprehensive sex education policy. American Journal of Sexuality Education. 2019;14(4):490-513.
  10. Keogh SC, Stillman M, Awusabo-Asare K, E Sidze E.Monzon A, Motta A, et al. Challenges to implementing national comprehensive sexuality education curricula in low- and middle-income countries: case studies of Ghana, Kenya, Peru and Guatemala. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200513.
  11. Huaynoca S, Chandra-Mouli V, Yaqub Jr N. Marie Denno D. Scaling up comprehensive sexuality education in Nigeria: from national policy to nationwide application. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning. 2014;14(2):191-209.
  12. Rosenberg MB. Nonviolent communication-a language of life. 21th ed. Singer K. Korean center for nonviolent communication: Korean center for nonviolent communication; 2016. pp. 21-3.
  13. Yang JW, Kim S. Integrative review of nonviolent communication intervention studies. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2016;13(1):36-47.
  14. Lee HJ, Kim SO. The development and verification of an experiential couple group therapy program: integration of the Satir growth model and non-violent communication. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2010;11(2):831-54.
  15. Hutchinson MK, Cooney TM. Patterns of parent-teen sexual risk communication: implications for intervention. Family Relations. 1998;47(2):185-94.
  16. Cho SH. A study on sexual behavior of college students who experienced reciprocal relationships [dissertation]. Seoul: Myongji University; 2012.
  17. Kim KM. The relation between romantic attachment and psychological well-being of college students: the mediating effect of romantic competence. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2019;19(6):135-47.
  18. Branch RM. Instructional design: the ADDIE approach [Internet]. Springer-verlag: Springer US; 2009 [cited 2018 July 1]. Available from:
  19. Long Live Love. Long live love the six lessons [Internet]. Nederland: Lang Leve de Liefde; 2018 [cited 2018 May 3]. Available from:
  20. Simon L, Daneback K. Adolescents' use of the Internet for sex education: a thematic and critical review of the literature. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2013;25(4):305-19.
  21. Shin KR, Park HJ, Hong CM. Effects of an educational program about reproductive health promotion on sexual knowledge and attitudes of university students from Korea. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2010;22(4):448-56.
  22. Haberland N, Rogow D. Sexuality education: emerging trends in evidence and practice. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015;56(1):S15-21.
  23. Ketting E, Winkelmann C. New approaches to sexuality education and underlying paradigms. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56(6):250-5.
  24. Herat J, Plesons M, Castle C, Babb J, Chandra-Mouli V. The revised international technical guidance on sexuality education-a powerful tool at an important crossroads for sexuality education. Reproductive Health. 2018;15(1):185.
  25. Robinson DB, V MacLaughlin V. Sexual health education outcomes within Canada's elementary health education curricula: a summary and analysis. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2019;28(3):243-56.
  26. Kim YJ. A study on the limitations and values of convergence education with study of sex. Convergence Education Review. 2017;3:53-61.
  27. Burgess V, Dziegielewski SF, Green CE. Improving comfort about sex communication between parents and their adolescents: practice-based research within a teen sexuality group. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention. 2005;5(4):379-90.
  28. Heels SW. The impact of abstinence-only sex education programs in the united states on adolescent sexual outcomes. Perspectives. 2019;11(1):3.
  29. Stanger-Hall KF, Hall DW. Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(10):e24658.
  30. Pound P, Langford R, Campbell R. What do young people think about their school-based sex and relationship education? a qualitative synthesis of young people's views and experiences. British Medical Journal Open. 2016;6(9):e011329.