DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical analysis of resistance and dynamic behavior of gravity cage involving multiple cages of the same internal volume

내부용적이 동일한 여러 개 가두리의 저항과 동적거동에 대한 해석

  • CHOI, Kyu-Suk (Department of Fisheries Physics, Pukyong National University) ;
  • LEE, Chun-Woo (Department of Marine Production System Management, Pukyong National University) ;
  • LEE, Da-Yoon (Department of Fisheries Physics, Pukyong National University) ;
  • JANG, Yong-Suk (Department of Fisheries Physics, Pukyong National University)
  • 최규석 (부경대학교 수산물리학과) ;
  • 이춘우 (부경대학교 해양생산시스템관리학부) ;
  • 이다윤 (부경대학교 수산물리학과) ;
  • 장용석 (부경대학교 수산물리학과)
  • Received : 2020.02.11
  • Accepted : 2020.05.18
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

In fisheries, the importance of designing efficient fish cages is being emphasized as aquaculture has become more production than capture fishing. Particularly, the gravity cage system is one of the popular fish cage system in Korea. Currently, gravity cages of various shapes and sizes are being widely designed and installed in offshore and inland seas. The cage is subject to external forces, such as currents and waves, and the shape of the structure and tension on the ropes changes according to these external forces. Thus, it is important to accurately calculate these dynamic behavior, including the external forces and tension on the structure during the design stage. In this study, three types of cage systems with an equal internal volume of 8000 ㎥ were analyzed using mass-spring models and their behavior was interpreted through simulations. These simulations were used to analyze the behavior and tension of the ropes in response to currents and waves to aid in the selection of individual cage sizes for a given total volume. The numerical calculation results indicate that depending on the flow rate, the most resistant system is System 1, which has eight strays, and System 2 and System 3 have 69.4% and 54.8% of the resistance of System 1. Further, total resistance increased as the number of cages increased for all flow rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Aarsnes JV, Rudi H and Loland G. 1990. Current force on cage, net deflection. Engineering for offshore fish farming. Tomas Telford, London. 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1680/ioceefoff.16019.
  2. Fredriksson DW, Decew JC and Tsukrov I. 2007. Development of structural modeling techniques for evaluating HDPE plastic net pens used in marine aquaculture. Ocean Engineering 32, 2124-2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.04.007.
  3. Geir Loland. 1993. Current force on, and water flow through and around, floating fish farms. Aquaculture International. 1, 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00692665.
  4. Hosseini SA, Lee CW, Kim HS, Lee JH, and Lee GH. 2011. The sinking performance of the tuna purse seine gear with large-meshed panels using numerical method. Fish Sci 77, 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-011-0371-6.
  5. Kim HY, Lee CW, Shin JK, Kim HS, Cha BJ and Lee GH. 2007. Dynamic simulation of the behavior of purse seine gear and sea-trial verification. Fish Res 88, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.007.
  6. Lee CW, Lee JH, Cha BJ, Kim HY and Lee JH. 2005. Physical modeling for underwater flexible systems dynamic simulation. Ocean Eng 32, 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.007.
  7. Lee CW, Kim YB, Lee GH, Choe MY, Lee MK and Koo KW. 2008a. Dynamic simulation of a fish cage system subjected to currents and waves. Ocean Eng 35, 1521-1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.06.009.
  8. Lee JH, Karlsen L and Lee CW. 2008b. A method for improving the dynamic simulation efficiency of underwater flexible structures by implementing non-active points in modelling. ICES J Mar Sci 65, 1552-1558. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn126.
  9. Lee CW, Lee JH, Choi MY and Lee GH. 2010. Design and simulation tools for moored underwater flexible structures. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 43, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.2.159.
  10. Lee JH, Lee CW and Karlsen L. 2011. Sea trials and application of a numerical method for the analysis of the ocean current displacement phenomena of demersal longlines. Ocean Eng 38, 1744-1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.08.003.
  11. Lee CW, Lee JH, Park and SB. 2015. Dynamic behavior and deformation analysis of the fish cage system using mass-spring model. China Ocean Engineering 29, 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-015-0022-2.
  12. Li YC, Zhao YP, Gui FK and Teng B. 2006. Numerical simulation of the hydrodynamic behaviour of submerged plane nets in current. Ocean Eng 33, 2352-2368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.11.013.
  13. Tsukrov I, Eroshkin O, Fredriksson DW, Swift MR and Celikkol B. 2003. Finite element modeling of net panels using a consistent net element. Ocean Engineering 30, 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-8018(02)00021-5.
  14. Wakaba L and Balachandar S. 2007. On the added mass force at finite Reynolds and acceleration numbers. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 21, 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-007-0042-5.
  15. Zhao YP, Li YC, Dong GH, Gui FK and Teng B. 2007. Numerical simulation of the effects of structure size ratio and mesh type on three-dimensional deformation of the fishing-net gravity cage in current. Aquacult Eng 36, 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.01.003.
  16. Zhao YP, Bi CW, Dong GH, Gui FK, Yong C and Xu TJ. 2013. Numerical simulation of the flow field inside and around gravity cage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.06.001.