공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)

  • 제23권3호
  • /
  • Pages.20-31
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1738-6454(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8283(eISSN)
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학·공학 융합 수업의 중학교 현장적용을 위한 전문가 제안

Expert Suggestions for the Implementation of Science and Engineering Integrated Lesson in Middle Science Classrooms

  • 투고 : 2020.03.31
  • 심사 : 2020.05.09
  • 발행 : 2020.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to suggest a meaningful way of implementing science and engineering integrated lessons in school science settings. To this end, two types of science and engineering integrated lesson units (focusing on the physic concepts of light and wave) were developed based on the core elements of science and engineering integrated lesson; object, context, engineering design, and connection with science. These two units were implemented in free semester program in a middle school in a metropolitan city. Throughout the process of program implementation, instructor's reflection and focus group interview with participant students were collected to reveal problems arising from the field implementation. In addition, engineering education experts were interviewed to discuss the potential problems and possible solutions for the problems. As results of the study, five main problems of implementing escience and engineering integrated lessons in a school science setting were revealed and practical solutions for the problems were suggested by the experts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강주원.남윤경(2017). 영재 학생들의 공학 설계 기반 통합적 Stem 연구 활동이 창의적 공학문제해결 성향 및 공학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), 719-730. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.719
  2. 교육부(2017). 2015 개정 과학 교사용 지도서 현장 검토본. 교육부.
  3. 교육부(2017). 과학.수학.정보 교육진흥법 [법률 제14903호].
  4. 금영충.배선아(2012). Steam 교육에 대한 초등교사의 인식과 요구. 대한공업교육학회지, 37(2), 57-75.
  5. 김영민 외(2013). 초.중등교육에서의 공학교육 프로그램 개발: 중학교 건설공학분야를 중심으로. 한국기술교육학회지, 13(2), 21-41.
  6. 김영민.이영주.김기수(2016). 융합인재교육 (STEAM) 심화과정 연수에 대한 초.중등교사의 인식 및 교육요구도 분석. 실과교육연구, 22(2), 51-70.
  7. 김진수(2007). 기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 Stem 교육의 탐색. 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), 1-29.
  8. 백윤수 외(2012). 융합인재교육(STEAM) 실행방향 정립을 위한 기초연구. 연구보고 2012-12. 한국과학창의재단.
  9. 심재호.이양락.김현경(2015). Stem, steam 교육과 우리나라 융합인재교육의 이해와 해결 과제. 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709
  10. 이동영.남윤경(2018). 공학설계 측면에서 한국 Steam 프로그램 분석틀 제안. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.1.63
  11. 이정민.신영준(2014). 융합인재교육 (STEAM) 수업에서 초등교사들이 겪는 어려움 분석. 초등과학교육, 33(3), 588-596.
  12. 이효진.남윤경(2019). '빛'과 '소리'교육을 위한 공학설계 기반의 과학.공학 융합프로그램 개발 및 적용. 현장과학교육, 13(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.3.201908.211
  13. 임유나(2012). 통합 교육과정에 근거한 융합인재교육 (Steam) 의 문제점과 개선 방향. 초등교육연구, 25(4), 53-80.
  14. 2019 EiE(Museum of Science, Boston).(2019). Engineering design process. Retrieved from https://www.eie.org/overview/engineering-design-process.
  15. Bernie T. & Charles F.(2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York, United States: Jossey-Bass
  16. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S.(2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
  17. Fortus, D. et al.(2005). Design‐based science and realworld problem‐solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038165
  18. Hjalmarson, M. & Lesh, R.(2008). Engineering and design research: Intersections for education research and design. Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching, 96-110.
  19. Hutchinson, J. & Karsnitz, J.(1993). Design and problem solving in technology. New York, United States: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub.
  20. MDE(Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education).(2016). 2016 massachusetts science and Technology/Engineering curriculum framework. malden, MA. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2016-04.pdf
  21. Moore, T. J. et al.(2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2.
  22. Hynes, M. et al.(2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM course 2011. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267233181_Infusing_Engineering_Design_into_High_School_STEM_Courses
  23. NASA(National Aeronautics and Space Administration). (2018). Engineering design process. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/best/edp.html
  24. National Research Council.(2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  25. NGSS Lead States.(2013). Next generation science standard: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  26. Sanders, M. E.(2012). Integrative STEM education as "best practice". Paper presented at 7th biennial International Technology Education Research Conference. Queensland, Australia.
  27. Yakman, G.(2008). $ST\Sigma$@M education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. pupils attitudes towards technology. 2008 Annual Proceedings. Netherlands,
  28. Yakman, G. & Kim, J.(2007). Using BADUK to teach purposefully integrated STEM/STEAM education. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Conference International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning, Atlanta, USA. Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning. Atlanta, USA.