Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제33권8호
  • /
  • Pages.1352-1359
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Orally administered Lactobacillus casei exhibited several probiotic properties in artificially suckling rabbits

  • Shen, Xue Mei (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University) ;
  • Cui, Hong Xiao (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University) ;
  • Xu, Xiu Rong (College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University)
  • 투고 : 2018.12.23
  • 심사 : 2019.04.07
  • 발행 : 2020.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Lactobacilli in rabbit intestine is rare and its function in rabbit gut health is not fully understood. The present study aimed to evaluate in vivo the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus casei for suckling rabbits. Methods: Two healthy 5-day-old suckling rabbits with similar weights from each of 12 New Zealand White litters were selected and disturbed to control group and treatment group. All rabbits were artificially fed. The treatment group had been supplemented with live Lactobacillus casei in the milk from the beginning of the trial to 13 days of age. At 15 days of age, healthy paired rabbits were slaughtered to collect intestinal samples. Results: i) Oral administration of Lactobacillus casei significantly increased the proportion of Lactobacilli in the total intestinal bacteria (p<0.01) and obviously reduced that of Escherichia-Shigella (p<0.01); ii) treatment increased the length of vermiform appendix (p<0.05); iii) a higher percentage of degranulated paneth cells was observed in the duodenum and jejunum when rabbits administered with Lactobacillus casei (p<0.01); and iv) the expression of toll-like receptor 9, lysozyme (LYZ), and defensin-7-like (DEFEN) in the duodenum and jejunum was stimulated by supplemented Lactobacillus casei (p<0.05). Conclusion: Orally administered Lactobacillus casei could increase the abundance of intestinal Lactobacilli, decrease the relative abundance of intestinal Escherichia-Shigella, promote the growth of appendix vermiform, stimulate the degranulation of paneth cells and induce the expression of DEFEN and LYS. The results of the present study implied that Lactobacillus casei exhibited probiotic potential for suckling rabbits.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fortunlamothe L, Boullier S. Interactions between gut microflora and digestive mucosal immunity, and strategies to improve digestive health in young rabbits. Nucl Phys A (Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress; 2004 Sept 7-10: Puebla, Mexico. pp. 1035-67.
  2. Skrivanova E, Molatova Z, Marounek M. Effects of caprylic acid and triacylglycerols of both caprylic and capric acid in rabbits experimentally infected with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O103. Vet Microbiol 2008;126:372-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.010
  3. Falcao-e-Cunha L, Solla LC, Maertens L, et al. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in rabbit feeding: a review. World Rabbit Sci 2010;15:127-40. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2007.597
  4. Yu B, Tsen HY. Lactobacillus cells in the rabbit digestive tract and the factors affecting their distribution. J Appl Bacteriol 1993;75:269-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02776.x
  5. Fann MK, O'Rourke D. Normal bacterial flora of the rabbit gastrointestinal tract: a clinical approach. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med 2001;10:45-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/saep.2001.19794
  6. Fortunlamothe L, Boullier S. A review on the interactions between gut microflora and digestive mucosal immunity. Possible ways to improve the health of rabbits. Livest Sci 2007;107:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.09.005
  7. Fakruddin M, Hossain MN, Ahmed MM. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IFST062013, a potential probiotic. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017;17: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1591-9
  8. Valeriano VD, Parungao-Balolong MM, Kang DK. In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. J Appl Microbiol 2014;117:485-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12539
  9. Izquierdo E, Medina M, Ennahar S, Marchioni E, Sanz Y. Resistance to simulated gastrointestinal conditions and adhesion to mucus as probiotic criteria for Bifidobacterium longum strains. Curr Microbiol 2008;56:613-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9135-7
  10. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013;155:1451-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024
  11. Rhee KJ, Sethupath P, Driks A, Lanning DK, Knight KL. Role of commensal bacteria in development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues and preimmune antibody repertoire. J Immunol 2004;172:1118-24. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.2. 1118
  12. Clevers HC, Bevins CL. Paneth cells: maestros of the small intestinal crypts. Annu Rev Physiol 2013;75:289-311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183744
  13. Satoh Y. Effect of live and heat-killed bacteria on the secretory activity of Paneth cells in germ-free mice. Cell Tissue Res 1998;251:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215451
  14. Rumio C, Sommariva M, Sfondrini L, et al. Induction of Paneth cell degranulation by orally administered toll-like receptor ligands. J Cell Physiol 2012;227:1107-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22830
  15. Cui HX, Xu XR. Comparing the effect of intestinal bacteria from rabbit, pig, and chicken on inflammatory response in cultured rabbit crypt and villus. Can J Microbiol 2019;65:59-67. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0757
  16. Kawashima T, Kosaka A, Yan H, et al. Double-stranded RNA of intestinal commensal but not pathogenic bacteria triggers production of protective interferon-${\beta}$. Immunity 2013;38:1187-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.024
  17. Li J, Shen XM, Xu XR, et al. Identification and in vitro probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from small intestinal mucosa of Rex rabbit. J Northwest A&F University 2017;45:112-7.
  18. Zhu KH, Xu XR, Sun DF, Tang JL, Zhang YK. Effects of drinking water acidification by organic acidifier on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and caecal bacteria in growing rabbits. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;190:87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.01.014
  19. Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB. Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:4117-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005
  20. Baboota RK, Murtazaa N, Jagtapb S, et al. Capsaicin-induced transcriptional changes in hypothalamus and alterations in gut microbial count in high fat diet fed mice. J Nutr Biochem 2014;25:893-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.04.004
  21. Huijsdens X, Linskens R, Mak M, Meuwissen S, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Savelkoul P. Quantification of bacteria adherent to gastrointestinal mucosa by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4423-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.12.4423-4427. 2002
  22. Gao B, Yang XN, Yu XH, Luo W, Huang H. Development of a real-time RT-PCR assay for qualification of rabbit's GAPDH gene. Chin Anim Hus Vet Med 2010;37:69-73.
  23. Rodriguez-Romero N, Abecia, Fondevila M. Bacterial profile from caecal contents and soft faeces in growing rabbits given diets differing in soluble and insoluble fibre levels. Anaerobe 2012;18:602-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.10.006
  24. Bermudezbrito M, Plazadiaz J, Munozquezada S, Gomezllorente C, Gil A. Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann Nutr Metab 2012;61:160-74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342079
  25. Stepankova R, Kovaru F, Kruml J. Lymphatic tissue of the intestinal tract of germfree and conventional rabbits. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 1980;25:491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897215
  26. Zhang YK, Cui HX, Sun DF, Liu LH, Xu XR. Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits. World Rabbit Sci 2018;26:71-9. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.5917
  27. Rumio C, Besusso D, Palazzo M, et al. Degranulation of Paneth cells via toll-like receptor 9. Am J Pathol 2004;165:373-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63304-4
  28. Reid G, Guarner F, Gibson G, Tompkins T, Gill H, Rowland I. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics in murine experimental colitis. Gastroenterology 2004;127:366-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.052

피인용 문헌

  1. Celiac Disease and the Microbiome vol.11, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102403
  2. Contribution of Infectious Agents to the Development of Celiac Disease vol.9, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030547
  3. Probiotics in Rabbit Farming: Growth Performance, Health Status, and Meat Quality vol.11, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123388