Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Measurement Tools for Success and Failure Factors of Education and Training of Korean Bodyguard

  • Received : 2020.05.04
  • Accepted : 2020.06.02
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of developing a measurement tool for success and failure factors of education and training of Korean bodyguards. conducted a meeting from the fully open questionnaire at first, and then formed the semi-structured questionnaire, finally carried out the survey from the closed questionnaire and analyzed data from SPSS 21.0, AMOS 21.0 and developed the measurements. It was conducted from May, 2019 to December, 2019. This survey was conducted of 150 security guards after the verification of the content validity though the pilot survey and presented the success attribution factors and standards on the basis of the result form this survey. As a result, the success factors of the training of the bodyguards were accidental education (5 item), vocational mental education (2 item), vocational mental education (2 item), work ability enhancement education (2 item), realistic practical education (2 item) ), Including 4 items, 11 items, The failure factors consisted of 12 item of three factors: formal education and training (5 item), lack of leadership qualities (4 item), and lack of education (3 item).

이 연구는 한국 경호원의 교육훈련 성패요인에 대한 측정도구를 개발하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 1차 조사에서는 완전 개방형 질문지를 통하여 면담을 실시하였으며, 2차 조사에서는 반구조화 질문지를 구성하여 면담을 실시하였다. 3차 조사에서는 폐쇄형 설문지를 제작한 후 설문조사를 실시하였다. 데이터는 SPSS 21.0, AMOS 21.O 통계패키지를 통하여 데이터를 처리하는 과정을 거쳤다. 조사기간은 최초 질문지를 배포한 2019년 5월부터 동년 12월까지 약 7개월간에 걸쳐 실시하였으며, 예비조사를 통하여 문항의 구성타당도를 검증한 후 3년 이상 경력이 있는 150명의 경호원을 대상으로 본 조사를 실시하였다. 조사 결과, 한국 경호원의 교육훈련에 대한 성공요인은 우발상황대처교육(5문항), 직업정신교육(2문항), 직업정신교육(2문항), 업무능력강화교육(2문항), 현실적인실무교육(2문항) 등 4개요인 11개 문항으로 구성되었다. 실패요인은 형식적인교육훈련(5문항), 지도자자질부족(4문항), 교육 부족(3문항) 등 3개요인 12문항으로 구성되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sjkim, "Study for academic establishment of phase of Department of Security Service", Journal of Information and Security, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 197-205, 2013.
  2. Smshin, "A study on modeling instruction and training program for Korean private security guard", Graduate School of Yong-in University, South Korea, p. 26, 2004.
  3. Jmkim, "Plans for establishing a training system in protection martial arts for crisis management", Graduate School of Yong-in University, South Korea, 2009.
  4. Jspark, "The Relationship of Private Guard's Martial Arts Training with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Royalty", Graduate School Kyonggi University, 2011
  5. Ynsong, and Bckim, "Development Devices on Security Martial Arts Education of Private Security Personnel", Journal of The Korean Alliance of Martial Arts, Vol. 12, No.3, pp. 327-342, 2010. https://doi.org/10.35277/kama.2010.12.3.327
  6. Kmlee, "A Study on Development measures of Training System for Crisis Reaction Capability of Private Security Personnel -Focussed on Security Service Martial Arts-", Journal of The Korean Society of Private Security, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 138-160, 2014.
  7. Smshin, and Tmkim, "Measure to Improve the Martial Arts Education And Training Relating to Personal Security and Guard Works", Journal of The Korean Alliance of Martial Arts, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 357-372, 2009. https://doi.org/10.35277/kama.2009.11.2.357
  8. Ykkang, "A Study on the Development Plan of Education and Training for Private Security and Security in Korea", Journal of The Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1999.
  9. Hspark, and Yolee, "A Study about The Motivational Theory-Based Types of Security Guard's Martial Art Training on Job Performance", Korean Security Journal, pp. 179-198, 2009.
  10. Jhkim, and Kskim, and Mhkang, "Development plan of the martial art education for guard throgh Taekwondo training", The Journal of Martial Arts, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 77-90, 2010.
  11. Kskim, "AMOS 18.0 Structural Equation Model Analysis", Seoul Korea: Hannarae Publisher, 2008.
  12. Tjsung, "Change of the Concept, Definitions, and Sources of Validity Evidence", The Korean Society for Educational Evaluation, Vol.13, No. 2, pp,1-11, 2000.
  13. Shoh, "A Unified Concept of Construct Validity", The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, Vol. 22, pp,67-77, 2000. https://doi.org/10.21797/KSME.2020.22.4.006
  14. Shoh, and Bjkim, "New Concept of Validity for Psychological Assessment Instruments and Its Usage", Korean Society of Sport Psychology, Vol. 133, pp,111-126, 2002.
  15. Kykim, and HCKang, "Structural Equation Model Analysis Using LISREL SIMPLIS", Seoul Korea : Free Academy, 2011.
  16. Smlee, "Factor Analysis Basics", Seoul Korea : Kyoyookbook, 2000.
  17. C. Fornell, and D. Lacker, "Evaluating structural equation models with un observables and measurement error", Journal of marketing research, Vol. 18, 39-50, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  18. Benson, J, and J. A. Fleishman, "The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis", Quality and Quantity, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 117-136., 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102757
  19. M. Lei, and R. G. Lomax, "The dffect of varying degrees of non-normality in structural equation modeling", Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-27, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1