의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제22권2호
  • /
  • Pages.67-76
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회인지이론과 의학교육: 어떻게 사회적 상호작용을 통해 학습이 일어나는가

Social Cognitive Theory and Medical Education: How Social Interactions Can Inform Learning

  • 김혜원 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Kim, Hae Won (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.05.12
  • 심사 : 2020.06.15
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The structures and processes of medical education have changed little since the publication of Flexner's report, which stressed the scientific orientation of medical education and the curricular structure of 2 years of formal knowledge education and 2 years of clinical experience. However, the previous perspectives on medical education are facing challenges, and these call for new pedagogy and theories on which to base medical education practice. Considering that social dimensions of learning have been emphasized in practice, perspectives that integrate these aspects are needed. Among the various learning theories, social cognitive theory refers to the theoretical framework which contends that learning occurs within interactions with others and environments. From a social cognitive standpoint, learning through observation is a critical component in human functioning. Indeed, observational learning has particular significance in medical education in that it provides the context for which the importance and meaning of role models can be understood. In addition, as theoretical constructs such as self-efficacy and outcome expectations allow us to establish an effective learning environment, exploring the concepts of the theory could be beneficial to medical education practice. In this context, the present review article aims to provide a glimpse of the fundamental assumptions and theoretical concepts of social cognitive theory and discusses the implications the theory has on teaching and learning. Further, a review of previous studies could help explain how the theory has informed medical education practice. Finally, the author will conclude with the implications and limitations of applying social cognitive theory in medical education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schunk DH. Introduction to the study of learning. In: Schunk DH, editor. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2012. p. 1-28.
  2. Ormrod JE. Human learning. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2016.
  3. Hodges BD, Kuper A. Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2012;87(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318238e069
  4. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin number four, 1910. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(7):594-602.
  5. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x
  6. Karazivan P, Dumez V, Flora L, Pomey MP, Del Grande C, Ghadiri DP, et al. The patient-as-partner approach in health care: a conceptual framework for a necessary transition. Acad Med. 2015;90(4):437-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000603
  7. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  8. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):718-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000700
  9. Kenny NP, Mann KV, MacLeod H. Role modeling in physicians' professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med. 2003;78(12):1203-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200312000-00002
  10. Schunk DH. Behaviorism. In: Schunk DH, editor. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2012. p. 71-116.
  11. Clark KR. Learning theories: cognitivism. Radiol Technol. 2018;90(2):176-9.
  12. Miller NE, Dollard J. Social learning and imitation. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1941.
  13. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Morristown (NJ): General Learning Press; 1971.
  14. Kaufman DM. Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O'Brien BC, editors. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. p. 37-69.
  15. Hoy AW. Educational psychology. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2013.
  16. Goldie J. Integrating professionalism teaching into undergraduate medical education in the UK setting. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):513-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801995225
  17. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. In: Vasta R, editor. Annals of child development. Greenwich (CT): JAI Press; 1989. p. 1-60.
  18. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  19. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York (NY): W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
  20. Bandura A. Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich (CT): Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 1-43.
  21. Schunk DH, Pajares F. The development of academic self-efficacy. In: Wigfield A, Eccles JS, editors. Development of achievement motivation. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2002. p. 15-31.
  22. Van Dinther M, Dochy F, Segers M. Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educ Res Rev. 2011;6(2):95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
  23. Bong M, Skaalvik EM. Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educ Psychol Rev. 2003;15(1):1-40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
  24. Schunk DH. Social cognitive theory. In: Schunk DH, editor. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2012. p. 117-62.
  25. Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York (NY): Harper and Row; 1951.
  26. Kay D, Kibble J. Learning theories 101: application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015
  27. Morris C. Work-based learning. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O'Brien BC, editors. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. p. 163-77.
  28. Lockspeiser TM, O'Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(3):361-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9049-8
  29. English R, Brookes ST, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Ben-Shlomo Y. The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):965-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02565.x
  30. Hill AG, Yu TC, Barrow M, Hattie J. A systematic review of resident-as-teacher programmes. Med Educ. 2009;43(12):1129-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03523.x
  31. Baranowski T, Perry C, Parcel GS. How individuals, environment, and health behavior interact: social cognitive theory. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 165-84.
  32. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(2):143-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
  33. Plow MA, Chang J. Promoting healthy behaviors in stroke survivors. In: Wilson R, Raghavan P, editors. Stroke rehabilitation. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2019. p. 279-90.
  34. Young MD, Plotnikoff RC, Collins CE, Callister R, Morgan PJ. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014;15(12):983-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12225
  35. Papinczak ZE, Connor JP, Feeney GF, Harnett P, Young RM, Gullo MJ. Testing the biosocial cognitive model of substance use in cannabis users referred to treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:216-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.032
  36. O'Leary A; The National Institute of Mental Health Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group. Social-cognitive theory mediators of behavior change in the National Institute of Mental Health Multisite HIV Prevention Trial. Health Psychol. 2001;20(5):369-76. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.20.5.369
  37. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.