DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis beef consumption using SUR

  • Cha, Ye Bon (Department of agricultural economics, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Rho, Ho Young (Department of agricultural economics, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hwang, Joon Byeong (Department of agricultural economics, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeon, Sang Gon (Department of agricultural economics, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2020.02.18
  • Accepted : 2020.04.28
  • Published : 2020.06.01

Abstract

This various factors that affect beef consumption behavior between different types of beef such as Hanwoo, Australian, American, and domestic Yukwoo. Previous studies usually used almost ideal demand system (AIDS) model to show the degree of substitution between meats especially domestic and foreign beef. This a real expenditure each individual and to explain what factors affect consumers especially focusing on various beef. Hence, previous studies used shares and prices as key variableshowever, this study use various socio-demographic variables, consumption tendency, satisfaction and importance for beef consumption, purchasing usage and part, etc. This study a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to enhance efficiency of estimates because error terms of four beef consumption equations are correlated. For, an on-line survey was performed Aug. 5 - 14, and we obtained 979 effective samples. The results show that high income group (more than 700 mil. won per month) purchases more beef than other groups. The origin of orders is Hanwoo, Yukwoo, Australian beef, and American beef. A family who member purchases more Yukwoo than other groups. foreign affects beef consumption regardless of its origin. Individuals who think origin and taste prefer Hanwoo. However, individuals who think price prefer Australian beef.

Keywords

References

  1. Han SW, Lee BO. 2010. A study on the purchasing behaviors of consumers for domestic and imported beef in Korea. Journal of Agriculture and Life Science 22:73-89. [in Korean]
  2. Jeong KS, Kim MK, Seo HS. 2015. Estimation of substitutability of Hanwoo and imported beef using regression diagnostics. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 56:31-50. [in Korean].
  3. Jeong MK, Choi JS, Jeon SG, Yoo CH, Heo D. 2002. Analysis on beef marketing and consumption behavior. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  4. Kim SH, Han JH. 2019. Measuring the social effects of the origin labeling of beef in the Korean food service sector. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:323-333. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20190018
  5. KREI (Korea Rural Economic Institute). 2020. Agricultural outlook. KREI, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  6. Lee HW, Kang DW, Han SH. 2016. Empirical analysis on differentiation between Hanwoo and imported beef. Rural Development 39:1-21. [in Korean]
  7. Lee KI. 2000. Consumer demand analysis for meats in Korea: Using AIDS, tobit, hedonic price models. Ph.D. dissertation, Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  8. Lim QL, Cho YB, Cho JH. 2014. An estimation of apple, pear, tangerine, orange demand system with panel data. Korean Journal of Food Marketing Economics 31:67-84. [in Korean]
  9. Na YJ, Kim MK, Jang JB. 2013. Analysis for consumers' purchasing intension of imported beef. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 40:195-222. [in Korean]
  10. Park SH, An DW. 2019. Analysis on demand system based on raw and processed meats. Korean Food Marketing Association, Summer Seminar 2018:5-35. [in Korean]
  11. Shin JS, Kim CH, Choen DW. 2019. Analysis of beef and pork demand system using agri-food consumer panel survey data. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 46:239-264. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.30805/KJAMP.2019.46.3.239