벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.47-57
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

창업 기회의 유형과 실험실 창업에 대한 개념적 연구

A Conceptual Study on the Types of Entrepreneurial Opportunity and Laboratory Start-ups

  • 투고 : 2020.04.08
  • 심사 : 2020.06.23
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 창업 기회의 유형에 따라 창업 기회 탐색, 창업 기회 실현에 필요한 자질과 환경 조건이 다를 필요가 있다는 것에 주목한다. 특히, 최근 정책적 관심이 부각되고 있는 실험실 창업의 창업 기회 유형을 확인하고자 하였다. 실험실 창업의 창업 기회 유형이 차별적으로 확인되면, 이에 적절한 창업 지원 정책과 교육 훈련 프로그램을 수립할 수 있다. 본 연구를 위해 창업 기회의 유형과 관련된 최근 30년간의 논문을 대상으로 8개의 주요 논문을 선정한 후, 각 기회 유형별 구분 속성을 도출하였다. 그리고 인식, 발견, 창조 기회에 대한 기존 이론들을 정리한 후, 이를 비판적으로 검토하여 재조명하였다. 그리고 실험실 창업의 내용을 수정 검토한 기회 유형의 구분 속성에 따라 검증하여'창조 기회'유형으로 변별하였다. 또한 창조 기회 유형에서 창업가에게 필요한 역량의 한 예시로 네트워킹 역량과 시장 지향성을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 시사점은 창업 기회에 대한 존재론적 유형론을 변별하기 쉽게 중요한 구분 속성을 도출하여 개념적으로 정리한 점이다. 그리고 기존의 유형론 중 일부 혼동되었던 문제들을 비판적으로 재구성하였으며, 이를 토대로 실험실 창업의 창업 기회 유형을 창조 기회 유형으로 확정하였다. 이러한 성과는 향후 실험실 창업 및 기회 유형에 따른 창업 정책 및 창업 교육 프로그램의 개선에 도움을 주어 창업 현장에서의 실질적 성과 실현에 기여할 수 있다.

This study focuses on the proposition that the qualities and environmental conditions required for exploring entrepreneurial opportunities and realizing entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the types of entrepreneurial opportunities. In particular, this study aims to identify the type of entrepreneurial opportunities for laboratory start-ups, which have recently been gaining policy level attention. If the type of entrepreneurial opportunities for laboratory start-ups is identified as discriminative, appropriate start-up support policies and training programs can be established. For this study, eight major papers were identified among the papers of last 30 years related to the types of entrepreneurial opportunities. After, the classification attributes for each opportunity type were derived. Then, the existing theories of recognition, discovery and creative opportunities were organized, critically reviewed and reorganized. In addition, the substance of laboratory start-ups was verified according to the standardized classification attributes of the revised and reorganized opportunity types and newly classified as 'creative opportunity'. This study also presents networking capabilities and market orientation as examples of the capabilities needed for entrepreneurs of creative opportunity type. The implication of this study is that it makes it easy to discriminate ontological typology of entrepreneurial opportunity, derives important classification attributes, and that it organizes them conceptually. In addition, it critically reconstructs the problems of confusion in the existing typology, and based on this, the type of entrepreneurial opportunities for laboratory start-ups is determined as creative opportunity. These achievements can contribute to the improvement of start-up policies and start-up training programs according to the types of entrepreneurial opportunity and laboratory start-ups in the future, resulting in realization of actual results at the start-up sites.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B.(2007). Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial Action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
  2. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B.(2010). Entrepreneurship and Epistemology: The Philosophical Underpinnings of the Study of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 557-583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495521
  3. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B.(2013). Epistemology, Opportunities, and Entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman et al.(2012) and Shane(2012). Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 154-157. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0069
  4. Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Anderson, P.(2013). Forming and Exploiting Opportunities: The Implications of Discovery and Creation Processes for Entrepreneurial and Organizational Research. Organization Science, 24(1), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0727
  5. Alsos, G. A., & Kaikkonen, V.(2002). Opportunities and Prior Knowledge: A Study of Experienced Entrepreneurs. Babson College, Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BKERC) (Vol. 2006), 301-314.
  6. Ameka, I., & Dhewanto, W.(2013). Technology Push vs. Market Pull in Technology University Innovation Commercialization Case Study: ITB. Information Management and Business Review, 5, 337-341. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v5i7.1060
  7. An, J. M.(2015). Analysis of National R&D Commercialization Policy: An Out-bound Open Innovation Perspective. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(4), 561-589.
  8. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S.(2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
  9. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A.(2001). Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 419-451.
  10. Aulet, B., & Murray, F.(2013). A Tale of Two Entrepreneurs: Understanding Differences in the Types of Entrepreneurship in the Economy. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, 1-9.
  11. Baron, R. A.(2004). The Cognitive Perspective: A Valuable Tool for Answering Entrepreneurship's Basic "Why" Questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
  12. Bjornskov, C., & Foss, N. J.(2016). Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know?. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(4), 292-315. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0135
  13. Bower, D. J.(2002). Matching Technology Push to Market Pull: Strategic Choices and the Academic Spinout Firm. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2002.000489
  14. Busenitz, L. W., Plummer, L. A., Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A., & Rhoads, K.(2014). Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12120
  15. Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D., & Lyon, D. W.(2003). Outcome Implication of Opportunity Creation/Discovery Processes. In Bygrave et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 398-409.
  16. Chesbrough, H.(2003). Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  17. Choi, J. Y.(2010). Characteristics of Network and Performance of Technology Based Start-ups. The Korean Venture Management Review, 13(4), 87-108.
  18. Choi, J. Y.(2013). Concreteness of Technological Capabilities and Performance of Technology Based Start-up Company. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.8.1.201303.29
  19. Companys, Y. E., & McMullen, J. S.(2007). Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9034-x
  20. Davidsson, P.(2003). The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some Suggestions. In Katz, J. & Shepherd, D. (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Entrepreneurship Research, 6, Oxford, UK: Elsevier/JAI Press, 315-372.
  21. Davidsson, P.(2015). Entrepreneurial Opportunities and the Entrepreneurship Nexus: A Re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
  22. de Jong, J. P.(2013). The Decision to Exploit Opportunities for Innovation: A Study of High-tech Small-business Owners. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00459.x
  23. de Jong, J. P., & Marsili, O.(2010). Schumpeter versus Kirzner: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types. EIM Research Reports, 1-29.
  24. de Jong, J. P., & Marsili, O.(2015). The Distribution of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian Opportunities. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9585-1
  25. Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. M.(2005). The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using the 4I Organizational Learning Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00092.x
  26. Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A.(2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00225-8
  27. Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S.(2010). An Update to the Individual-opportunity Nexus. In Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. New York, Springer, 47-76.
  28. Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A.(2013). Response to the Commentaries: The Individual-opportunity (IO) Nexus Integrates Objective and Subjective Aspects of Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 160-163. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0192
  29. Farsi, J. Y., Moradi, M., & Zali, M. R.(2019). Opportunity Domains: Invisible Boundaries of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-21.
  30. George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J.(2016). A Systematic Literature Review of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: Insights on Influencing Factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y
  31. Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W.(1962). Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. London: Routledge.
  32. Hansen, D. J., Shrader, R., & Monllor, J.(2009). Composite Definitions of Entrepreneurial Opportunity and Their Operationalizations: Toward a Typology. In Zacharakis, A. et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(17), Wellesley, MA: Babson College. 601-616.
  33. Hunter, M.(2013). A Typology of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 8(2), 128-166.
  34. Kirzner, I.(1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  35. Kwun, M. Y. & Jeong, H. J.(2012). The Effect of Entrepreneurs' Characteristic, Technological Capabilities and Network on Firm Performance of Technology-based Start-ups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.1.201203.7
  36. Lee, Y. & Park, S.(2014). A Study on the Success Factors of Venture Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.6.201412.231
  37. Lubik, S., Lim, S., Platts, K., & Minshall, T.(2012). Marketpull and Technology‐push in Manufacturing Start‐ups in Emerging Industries. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381311287463
  38. Maine, E. & Garnsey, E.(2006). Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures. Research Policy, 35, 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.006
  39. Markham, S. K.(2002). Moving Technologies from Lab to Market. Research-Technology Management, 45(6), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671531
  40. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B.(1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  41. Miller, K. D.(2007). Risk and Rationality in Entrepreneurial Processes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.2
  42. Mortara, L., Napp, J., Ford, S., & Minshall, T.(2011). Open Innovation Activities to Foster Corporate Entrepreneurship. In Cassia, L., Minola, T., & Paleari, S. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and Technological Change, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  43. Murphy, P. J.(2011). A 2 $\times$ 2 Conceptual Foundation for Entrepreneurial Discovery Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00368.x
  44. Nonaka, I.(1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  45. National Research Foundation of Korea(2019). Research on How to Cultivate Professional Manpower for Technology Commercialization to Activate Laboratory Startups. NRF ISSUE REPORT, 2019-5, 1-56.
  46. Paun, F.(2011). "Demand Readiness Level" (DRL), a New Tool to Hybridize Market Pull and Technology Push Approaches. Introspective Analysis of the New Trends in Technology Transfer Practices. halshs-00628978.
  47. Reynolds, P. D., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., & Babson College.(2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2003 Executive Report. MA: Babson College, 1-100.
  48. Rogers, E. M.(1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  49. Sarason, Y., Dean, T., & Dillard, J. F.(2006). Entrepreneurship as the Nexus of Individual and Opportunity: A Structuration View. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007
  50. Sarasvathy, S. D.(2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
  51. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. K.(2003). Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. In Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 141-160.
  52. Shane, S.(2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
  53. Shane, S.(2001). Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837
  54. Shane, S. A.(2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  55. Shane, S.(2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Delivering on the Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0078
  56. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S.(2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
  57. Shepherd, D. A., & DeTienne, D. R.(2005). Prior Knowledge, Potential Financial Reward, and Opportunity Identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00071.x
  58. Shin, C. & Kim, B.(2019). A Study on the Factors Influencing Business Performance of Startups: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Social Capital. Journal of Korea Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.24878/tkes.2019.14.3.121
  59. Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D.(2010). The Concept of "Opportunity" in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342746
  60. Schumpeter, J. A.(1934). Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  61. Smith, B. R., Mattews, C. H., & Schenkel, M. T.(2005). The Search for and Discovery of Different Types of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: The Effects of Tacitness and Codification. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 283-293.
  62. Tolber, P. S., & Zucker, L. G.(1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: the Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383
  63. Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.(2010). Are Opportunities Recognized or Constructed?. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.004
  64. Venkataraman, S.(1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor's Perspective. In Katz, J. & Brockhaus, R. (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth: Vol. 3, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 119-138.
  65. Vogel, P.(2017). From Venture Idea to Venture Opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 943-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12234
  66. Welter, C., & Alvarez, S.(2015). The State of Opportunities: Clarifying the Transitions between Opportunity Types. Management Decision, 53(7), 1398-1411. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0466
  67. Wood, M., Welter, C., Artz, K., & Bradley, S. W.(2014). Discerning Opportunity Types: Implications for Entrepreneurial Action and Entrepreneurship Education. Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century, 119-144.
  68. Zahra, S. A.(2008). The Virtuous Cycle of Discovery and Creation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.47