DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of house load operation on PSA based on operational experiences in Korea

  • Received : 2019.10.10
  • Accepted : 2020.05.16
  • Published : 2020.12.25

Abstract

House load operation (HLO) occurs when the generator supplies power to the house load without triggering reactor trips during grid disturbances. In Korea, the HLO capability of optimized power reactor 1000 (OPR1000) plants has prevented several reactor trips. Operational experiences demonstrate the difference in the reactor trip incidence due to grid disturbances between OPR1000 plants and Westinghouse plants in Korea, attributable to the availability of the HLO capability. However, probabilistic safety assessments (PSAs) for OPR1000 plants have not considered their specific design features in the initiating event analyses. In an at-power PSA, the HLO capability can affect the initiating event frequencies of general transients (GTRN) and loss of offsite power (LOOP), resulting from transients within the grid system. The initiating event frequencies of GTRN and LOOP for an OPR1000 plant are reduced by 17.7% and 78.7%, respectively, compared to the Korean industry-average initiating event frequencies, and its core damage frequency from internal events is reduced by 15.2%. The explicit consideration of the HLO capability in initiating event analyses makes significant changes in the risk contributions of the initiating events. Consequently, for more realistic at-power PSAs in Korea, we recommend incorporating plant-specific HLO-related design features when estimating initiating event frequencies.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using the financial resource granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 1705001), and the 2019 Research Fund of the KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School (KINGS) of the Republic of Korea.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Non-Baseload Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Load Following and Frequency Control Modes of Flexible Operation, Vienna, Austria, 2018. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-3.23.
  2. Nuclear Energy Agency/Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Defence in Depth of Electrical Systems and Grid Interaction, 2009. NEA/CSNI/R(2009)10.
  3. Nuclear Energy Agency/Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Probabilistic Safety Assessment Insights Relating to the Loss of Electrical Sources, October 2017. NEA/CSNI/R(2017)5.
  4. https://www.kepco-enc.com/eng/contents.do?key=1532.
  5. S.W. Sohn, J.J. Sohn, J.T. Seo, S.K. Lee, H.C. Park, Y.S. Kim, J.O. Kim, Evaluation of load rejection to house load test at 100% power for UCN 3, in: Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society 1998 Autumn Conference, Seoul, Republic of Korea, October 30-31, 1998.
  6. S.W. Sohn, I.H. Song, J.J. Sohn, J.H. Park, J.T. Seo, The performance evaluation of NSSS control systems for UCN 4, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 33 (3) (June 2001) 339-348.
  7. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Development and management of the national level operational feedback system for nuclear installations 9 (2010). KINS/ER-051.
  8. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, At-Power Internal Events Level 1 PSA Report for Shin-Kori Units 1 & 2, 2015.
  9. D.-S. Kim, J.H. Park, H.G. Lim, Technical note: estimation of Korean industry-average initiating event frequencies for use in probabilistic safety assessment, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 52 (1) (January 2020) 211-221.
  10. American Society of Mechanical Engineers & American Nuclear Society, Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008, Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers & American Nuclear Society, New York, U.S., 2013. ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2013.
  11. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, Shin-Kori Units 1&2 Abnormal Procedures, Loss of Loads, 2019, pp. 3500-3502.
  12. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Event Investigation Report for Hanbit Unit 6 Reactor Trip Due to the S/G High Level Owing to Unskillful Operation during Power Escalation, 2005 no. 2005-2010(050702Y6).
  13. Massoud Mohsendokht, Hadad Kamal, Massoud Jabbari, Reducing the loss of offsite power contribution in the core damage frequency of a VVER-1000 reactor by extending the house load operation period, Ann. Nucl. Energy 116 (2018) 303-313.
  14. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, Shin-Kori Units 1 & 2 Technical Specifications, 2019.
  15. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, Operating Experiences in Nuclear Information System, KONIS, 2019.
  16. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, Report of Shin-Kori Units 1 & 2 Pre-test Experience Record, 2011.
  17. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Event Investigation Report for Shin-Kori Unit 1 Reactor Automatic Trip Due to Abnormal Operation of 765 kV Switchyard Breaker, 2014 no. 2014-1(141010SK1).
  18. http://opis.kins.re.kr/opis?act=OPISMAIN.
  19. http://www.khnp.co.kr/eng/content/1005/main.do?mnCd=EN0302010213.