한국지구과학회지 (Journal of the Korean earth science society)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.261-272
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-6692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4518(eISSN)
한국지구과학회 (The Korean Earth Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TIMSS 2019의 8학년 지구과학 평가틀을 이용한 남한과 북한 지구과학 내용 비교 분석

A Comparative Analysis of South and North Korean Earth Science Curriculum using the TIMSS 2019 Eighth Grade Earth Science Evaluation Framework

  • 박기락 (조선대학교 과학교육과) ;
  • 박현주 (조선대학교 과학교육과)
  • Park, KiRak (Department of Science Education, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Hyun Ju (Department of Science Education, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.03
  • 심사 : 2020.06.25
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 남한과 북한 지구과학 내용의 학습 시기와 학습량을 비교 분석하여 향후 통일을 대비한 남·북한 통합 교육과정 설계 및 우리나라 교육과정 개정 시에 참고할 수 있는 기초 자료를 제공하는 것이다. 연구 대상으로는 남한은 초등학교 5학년부터 중학교 3학년까지의 과학 교과서와 고등학교의 통합과학과 지구과학 I·II 교과서이며, 북한은 초급중학교의 자연과학 1·2와 조선지리 2, 고급중학교의 지리 1 교과서이다. TIMSS 2019의 8학년 지구과학 평가틀로 분석한 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 남한은 반복 학습을 고려할 필요가 있다. 학습 이해에 효과적인 반복 학습이 적용된 내용은 8학년까지 1개에 그친다. 둘째, 남한은 학습 시기 조정을 고려할 필요가 있다. 북한과의 내용 시기 차이가 발생하고 TIMSS 기준 50%에 해당하는 내용의 학습 시기가 부합하지 않기 때문이다. 셋째, 남한과 북한은 학습하지 않은 TIMSS 내용을 반영할 필요가 있다. 이는 국제 사회에서 교육 경쟁력을 높이는 방안이 될 수 있다. 향후 남·북한의 지구과학 내용에 대한 접근 방법 비교 분석과 통합교육과정 설계를 위한 실질적 연구를 제안하였다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the earth science curriculums of South Korea and North Korea. Aspects such as the content of the curriculums and the timing of learning were analyzed, in order to provide basic data that can be used to design a revised and integrated Korean curriculum. The objects of this study were South Korean Science textbooks from grades 5-9, and the high school Unity of Science and Earth Science I and II textbooks. Additionally, from North Korea, the junior middle school Natural Science 1 and 2 textbooks and the senior middle school Chosun Geography 2 and Geography 1 textbooks were analyzed. The results of this study obtained through an analysis that used the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS 2019) grade 8 earth science assessment framework were as follows. First, South Korea needs to adopt iterative learning. Repetitive learning, which is effective for understanding what is being learned, is applied to only 1 by 8th grade. Second, South Korea needs to adjust the time when certain content is learned. This is because there is a disparity between when content is learned in comparison to North Korea, and the timing of learning of about 50% of the TIMSS standards have not been followed. Third, it is necessary to reflect the content present within the TIMSS that have not been learned. This can be a way to increase the nations' educational competitiveness in the international community. This paper proposed a comparative analysis of South korean and North Korean approaches to the earth science curriculum and conducted practical research to facilitate the construction of an integrated curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, I.H. and Yang, Y.E., 2010, A study on the adaptation process of North Korean immigrant youth discontinuing formal education. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 41(4), 189-224. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2010.41.4.189
  2. Cho, J.A., Lee, K.D., Kang, H.J., and Jeong, C.K., 2015, Education policy, education curriculum, and textbooks in the Kim Jong-un era. Korea Institute for National Unification. RRC 2015-03, 315p. (in Korean)
  3. Hong, J.M. and Jeong, Y. K., 2006, Perception of high school students in chonnam province on the meteorology terms in geography textbooks of North Korean secondary school. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(1), 15-19. (in Korean)
  4. Kim, E.K., 2015, Analysis of contents and activities of the North Korea secondary chemistry textbooks. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea, 78p. (in Korean)
  5. Kim, H.J. and Gu, N.O., 2019, Analysis of science instruction in Korea based on the results of PISA questionnaire. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 22(4), 85-104. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.22799/JCE.2019.22.4.004
  6. Kim, H.K. and Lim, H.J., 2019, Comparison of TIMSS 2019 science framework and Korean middle school science curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(18), 1221-1242. (in Korean)
  7. Kim, H.S., 2001, A comparative and analytic study on the biology textbooks for secondary school students between South Korea and North Korea: Focused on the research activities. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea, 79p. (in Korean)
  8. Kim, H.S., 2007, A study on a plan for the integration of science education of South and North Korea through an analysis of biology textbooks for a secondary school. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, 67p. (in Korean)
  9. Kim, J.Y., 1998, Research articles: A comparative study on middle and high school of biology curriculum and textbooks between South and North Korea. Journal of Biology Education, 26(2), 203-212. (in Korean)
  10. Kim, J.Y., Lee, Y.R, Choi, D.H., and Noh, S.G., 1998, A comparative study on elementary school science curriculum and textbooks between South and North Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 18(1), 43-60. (in Korean)
  11. Kim, K.W. and Kim, K.H., 2004, Comparative analysis of science curriculum and textbook between South and North Korea: Earth-science section. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 155-157. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2020.41.2.155
  12. Kim, M.S., Kim, J.S., and Park, S.R., 2017, Investigating the 2013 revised geography curriculum of North Korea. The Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 25(3), 69-83. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2017.25.3.69
  13. Kim, M.Y. and Kim, K.H., 2011, A content analysis of biology domain of Korean and Singaporean textbooks based on the TIMSS framework. Biology Education, 39(2), 217-234. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2011.39.2.217
  14. Kim, S.J., Kim, M.Y., Park, J.H., Jeon, K.H., Kim, M.J., and Seo, J.H., 2014, The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS 2015): a technical report of the TIMSS 2015 field survey and the results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. RRE 2014-3-1. (in Korean)
  15. Ko, Y.M., 2011, A comparative study of Korea and Singapore elementary science textbooks according to TIMSS:-Focused on the revised 2007 curriculum in 3rd and 4th grade-. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea, 61p. (in Korean)
  16. Kwak, Y.S., 2017, Exploration of features of Korean eighth grade students' achievement and curriculum matching in TIMSS 2015 earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 9-16. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0009
  17. Kwon, C.S., 1999, A comparative study on the science textbooks between D.P.R.K and republic of Korea. Journal of the Science and Mathematics Education, 25, 27-72. (in Korean)
  18. Kwon, C.S., 2012, Comparative analysis of the earth science contents in science textbooks between Korea and DPRK. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(3), 276-286. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2012.5.3.276
  19. Kwon, C.S. and Jang, M.S., 2004, A comparative study on the connection between elementary and secondary science contents of DPRK and republic of Korea. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(7), 558-564. (in Korean)
  20. Kwon, C.S. and Park, J.W., 1995, A comparative analysis of the primary science textbooks in Korea and D.P.R.K. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 191-225. (in Korean)
  21. Kwon, E.A., 2019, A study on the suitability of middle and high school social studies textbooks based on the spiral curriculum: Focused on the area of $^{o_{3}}Politics^{o_{1}/4}$ in the curriculum revised in 2015. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Sookmyung Women's University of Education, Seoul, Korea, 159p. (in Korean)
  22. Kwon, K.H., 2008, A comparative analysis of astronomy area in the elementary science textbooks of Korea and America. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea, 76p. (in Korean)
  23. Kwon, O.H., 2006, A study of efficiency through repetition study from each type. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea, 77p. (in Korean)
  24. Lee, H.K., 2007, North Korean students in the South Korean school system. Journal of Human Studies, 12, 7-32. (in Korean)
  25. Lee, H.Y., Lim, M.i., Kim, J.C., and Lee, H.C., 2018, A comparative study on unit and lesson frameworks and learning contents of elementary school mathematics textbooks between South Korea and North Korea with focus on 1st, 2nd and 3rd grade. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(3), 367-394. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.08.28.3.367
  26. Lee, J.E., 2004, The analysis of the primary science textbooks in the 7th national curriculum with TIMSS. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Chuncheon National University of Education, Chuncheon, Korea, 56p. (in Korean)
  27. Lee, M.S. and Lee, K.J., 2005, Comparison of biology contents and names of organisms in the elementary school science textbooks of South and North Korea. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(4), 476-486. (in Korean)
  28. Lee, M.S. and Lee, K.J., 2007, Comparison of evolution in biology textbooks of South and North Korea. Biology Education, 35(1), 134-149. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2007.35.1.134
  29. Lee, S.K. and Kwon, J.H., 2017, Direction of change and characteristic of content composition of geography textbook in North Korea at the era of Jung-Eun Kim. The Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 25(3), 85-95. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2017.25.3.85
  30. Lee, S.Y. and Noh, S.G., 2014, Comparison and analysis of the 2009 elementary science curriculum of South Korea and the elementary science curriculum of Finland. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 491-509. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.491
  31. Lee, Y.B., 1993, Astronomy education as science in elementary school of North Korea. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 12(2), 201-209. (in Korean)
  32. Lee, Y.R., 2000, Comparative study of earth science curriculum and textbooks of secondary school of South Korea and North Korea. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 21(1), 1-12. (in Korean)
  33. Lim, C.H. and Chae, D.H., 2018, An analysis the contents related to a subject 'Earth and Moon' from elementary science textbooks of the 2009 revised curriculum and 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 11(3), 237-243 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.3.237
  34. Min, Y.G., 1996, Study on physical education and textbook analysis in North Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(4), 329-339. (in Korean)
  35. Noh, S.G., 1999, Comparative study of chemistry curriculum and textbooks in the middle school of South and North Korea. Journal of Science Education, 11, 15-42. (in Korean)
  36. Noh, S.G., 2005, Changes of the format and content of science textbooks of North Korean elementary school in the 2000's. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(4), 452-464. (in Korean)
  37. OECD, 2016, PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. OECD Publishing.
  38. Park, K.R. and Park, H.J., 2019, A study of inquiry tendency of earth science contents presented in North Korea's textbooks. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 40(2), 188-199. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2018.40.2.188
  39. Shin, J.I. and Kim, K.M., 2002, A comparative study on elementary school science textbooks between Korea, China and Japan about the concepts of astronomy. Journal of Research in Science Education, 26, 23-38. (in Korean)
  40. Yore, L.D., 1991, Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280106