The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Construction reproducibility of a composite tooth model composed of an intraoral-scanned crown and a cone-beam computed tomography-scanned root

  • Lim, Seung-Weon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Moon, Ryu-Jin (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Seok (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Min-Hee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Min (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Hyeon-Shik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Hak (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyoung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2019.11.12
  • Accepted : 2020.03.03
  • Published : 2020.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the construction reproducibility of a composite tooth model (CTM) composed of an intraoral-scanned crown and a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned root. Methods: The study assessed 240 teeth (30 central incisors, 30 canines, 30 second premolars, and 30 first molars in the maxillary and mandibular arches) from 15 young adult patients whose pre-treatment intraoral scan and CBCT were available. Examiner-Reference (3 years' experience in CTM construction) and Examiners-A and Examiner-B (no experience) constructed the individual CTMs independently by performing the following steps: image acquisition and processing into a three-dimensional model, integration of intraoral-scanned crowns and CBCT-scanned teeth, and replacement of the CBCT-scanned crown with the intraoral-scanned crown. The tooth axis angle in terms of mesiodistal angulation and buccolingual inclination of the CTMs constructed by the three examiners were measured. To assess the construction reproducibility of CTMs, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments were performed. Results: The ICC values of mesiodistal angulation and buccolingual inclination among the 3 examiners showed excellent agreement (0.950-0.992 and 0.965-0.993; 0.976-0.994 and 0.973-0.995 in the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively). Conclusions: The CTM showed excellent construction reproducibility in mesiodistal angulation and buccolingual inclination regardless of the construction skill and experience levels of the examiners.

Keywords

References

  1. Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:93-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.034
  2. Mckee IW, Glover KE, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations. Angle Orthod 2001;71:442-51.
  3. Song IT, Cho JH, Chae JM, Chang NY. Evaluation of mesiodistal tooth axis using a CBCT-generated panoramic view. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:255-67. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.4.255
  4. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25500850
  5. Tong H, Enciso R, Van Elslande D, Major PW, Sameshima GT. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:133-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.027
  6. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
  7. Hayashi K, Sachdeva AU, Saitoh S, Lee SP, Kubota T, Mizoguchi I. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.021
  8. Sun L, Lee JS, Choo HH, Hwang HS, Lee KM. Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: a comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.022
  9. Lim SW, Hwang HS, Cho IS, Baek SH, Cho JH. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:348-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.031
  10. Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V, Norcini A. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:605-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.010
  11. Guo H, Zhou J, Bai Y, Li S. A three-dimensional setup model with dental roots. J Clin Orthod 2011;45:209-16; quiz 235-6.
  12. Kihara T, Tanimoto K, Michida M, Yoshimi Y, Nagasaki T, Murayama T, et al. Construction of orthodontic setup models on a computer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:806-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.027
  13. Lee RJ, Pham J, Choy M, Weissheimer A, Dougherty HL Jr, Sameshima GT, et al. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.011
  14. Lee RJ, Weissheimer A, Pham J, Go L, de Menezes LM, Redmond WR, et al. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.010
  15. Lee RJ, Pi S, Park J, Devgon D, Nelson G, Hatcher D, et al. Accuracy and reliability of the expected root position setup methodology to evaluate root position during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:583-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.010
  16. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E
  17. Schunk DH. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2012. p. 38-40.
  18. Wang C, Liu Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Zhao Y. Evaluation of in vivo digital root reconstruction based on anatomical characteristics of the periodontal ligament using cone beam computed tomography. Sci Rep 2018;8:269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18592-4
  19. Ye N, Long H, Xue J, Wang S, Yang X, Lai W. Integration accuracy of laser-scanned dental models into maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography images of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;117:780-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.02.022
  20. Marmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:28-31. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31342245
  21. Sang YH, Hu HC, Lu SH, Wu YW, Li WR, Tang ZH. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of in vivo teeth from cone-beam computed tomography. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016;129:1464-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.183430
  22. European Commission. Cone Beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: evidence-based guidelines [Internet]. Luxembourg: SEDENTEXCT; 2012 Mar [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf.