DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biomechanical considerations for uprighting impacted mandibular molars

  • Morita, Yukiko (Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences) ;
  • Koga, Yoshiyuki (Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences) ;
  • Nguyen, Tuan Anh (Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences) ;
  • Yoshida, Noriaki (Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences)
  • Received : 2019.01.16
  • Accepted : 2019.03.08
  • Published : 2020.07.25

Abstract

This case report demonstrates two different uprighting mechanics separately applied to mesially tipped mandibular first and second molars. The biomechanical considerations for application of these mechanisms are also discussed. For repositioning of the first molar, which was severely tipped and deeply impacted, a novel cantilever mechanics was used. The molar tube was bonded in the buccolingual direction to facilitate insertion of a cantilever from the buccal side. By twisting the distal end of the cantilever, sufficient uprighting moment was generated. The mesial end of the cantilever was hooked over the miniscrew placed between the canine and first premolar, which could prevent exertion of an intrusive force to the anterior portion of the dentition as a side effect. For repositioning of the second molar, an uprighting mechanics using a compression force with two step bends incorporated into a nickel-titanium archwire was employed. This generated an uprighting moment as well as a distal force acting on the tipped second molar to regain the lost space for the first molar and bring it into its normal position. This epoch-making uprighting mechanics could also minimize the extrusion of the molar, thereby preventing occlusal interference by increasing interocclusal clearance between the inferiorly placed two step bends and the antagonist tooth. Consequently, the two step bends could help prevent occlusal interference. After 2 years and 11 months of active treatment, a desirable Class I occlusion was successfully achieved without permanent tooth extraction.

Keywords

References

  1. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine fullmonth radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14:1165-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90204-3
  2. Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies--a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 2003;9:158-63.
  3. Keris EY, Bozkaya S, Ozturk M, Gungor K. Prevalence and characteristics of impacted permanent molars in a Turkish subpopulation. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2016;4:45-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-3841.196345
  4. Roberts WW 3rd, Chacker FM, Burstone CJ. A segmental approach to mandibular molar uprighting. Am J Orthod 1982;81:177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90051-3
  5. Kuhlberg AJ. Cantilever springs: force system and clinicalapplications. Semin Orthod 2001;7:150-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/sodo.2001.26689
  6. Lee KJ, Park YC, Hwang WS, Seong EH. Uprighting mandibular second molars with direct miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:627-35.
  7. Shapira Y, Borell G, Nahlieli O, Kuftinec MM. Uprighting mesially impacted mandibular permanent second molars. Angle Orthod 1998;68:173-8.
  8. Majourau A, Norton LA. Uprighting impacted second molars with segmented springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:235-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70137-0
  9. Fu PS, Wang JC, Chen CH, Huang TK, Tseng CH, Hung CC. Management of unilaterally deep impacted first, second, and third mandibular molars. Angle Orthod 2012;82:565-71. https://doi.org/10.2319/062411-409.1
  10. Resch D. Clinical management of unilaterally impacted mandibular first and second molars. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:162-4; quiz 148.
  11. Mehrotra R, Mehrotra A, Mistry J. Management of unilaterally impacted permanent mandibular first, second and third molars. J Ind Orthod Soc 2014;48:419-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820140611S
  12. Lau CK, Whang CZ, Bister D. Orthodontic uprighting of severely impacted mandibular second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:116-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.012
  13. Raveli TB, Raveli DB, de Mathias Almeida KC, Pinto ADS. Molar uprighting: a considerable and safe decision to avoid prosthetic treatment. Open Dent J 2017;31:466-75.
  14. Fu PS, Wang JC, Wu YM, Huang TK, Chen WC, Tseng YC, et al. Impacted mandibular second molars. Angle Orthod 2012;82:670-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/102111-656.1
  15. Sawicka M, Racka-Pilszak B, Rosnowska-Mazurkiewicz A. Uprighting partially impacted permanent second molars. Angle Orthod 2007;77:148-54. https://doi.org/10.2319/010206-461R.1
  16. Magkavali-Trikka P, Emmanouilidis G, Papadopoulos MA. Mandibular molar uprighting using orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2018;19:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0200-2
  17. Park HS, Kyung HM, Sung JH. A simple method of molar uprighting with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:592-6.
  18. Giancotti A, Muzzi F, Santini F, Arcuri C. Miniscrew treatment of ectopic mandibular molars. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:380-3.
  19. Giancotti A, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. Treatment of ectopic mandibular second molar with titanium miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:113-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.025
  20. Barros SE, Janson G, Chiqueto K, Ferreira E, Rosing C. Expanding torque possibilities: a skeletally anchored torqued cantilever for uprighting "kissing molars". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:588-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.006
  21. Mah SJ, Won PJ, Nam JH, Kim EC, Kang YG. Uprighting mesially impacted mandibular molars with 2 miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:849-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.027
  22. Nienkemper M, Ludwig B, Kanavakis G, Pauls A, Wilmes B, Drescher D. Uprighting mesially impacted lower third molars with skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2016;50:420-6.
  23. Melo AC, Duarte da Silva R, Shimizu RH, Campos D, Andrighetto AR. Lower molar uprighting with miniscrew anchorage: direct and indirect anchorage. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2013;24:9-14.
  24. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1
  25. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-6.
  26. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:S43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027
  27. Lai TT, Chen MH. Factors affecting the clinical success of orthodontic anchorage: experience with 266 temporary anchorage devices. J Dent Sci 2014;9:49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.02.010
  28. Chang CH, Lin JS, Roberts WH. Ramus screws: the ultimate solution for lower impacted molars. Semin Orthod 2018;24:135-54. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.012

Cited by

  1. Efficacy of Miniscrews in Gaining Prosthetic Space for a Dental Implant to Replace the Mandibular First Molar: A Case Series vol.11, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020607
  2. Effect of Different Surface Designs on the Rotational Resistance and Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study vol.21, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21061964