DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fluoride Release and Recharge Properties of Several Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials

수종의 불소함유 수복재의 불소 유리 및 재충전

  • Lee, Dongyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongsoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Miran (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Jisun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 이동연 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 한미란 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신지선 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2020.01.06
  • Accepted : 2020.01.17
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare the fluoride release and recharge properties of glass ionomer cements and 'alkasite'. Specimens of two glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX GP and Riva Self Cure), 'alkasite' restorative material (Cention N) and composite resin (Filtek™ Z350XT) were prepared. The fluoride release of each specimen was measured for 28 days. Thereafter, 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel was applied to experimental groups. No treatment was performed on control groups. The fluoride release was measured for additional 7 days to evaluate the fluoride recharge properties of each materials. The fluoride release was highest in Riva Self Cure, followed by Fuji IX GP, Cention N (p < 0.05). Fluoride release of Cention N was measured to be approximately 49% of Fuji IX GP's. After the application of 1.23% APF gel, increases in fluoride release were observed in Riva Self Cure, Fuji IX GP and Cention N (p < 0.05). Fluoride recharge was observed in Cention N as well as in glass ionomer cements. Further studies are required to evaluate the anti-cariogenic properties of Cention N at clinical conditions.

이 연구는 두 종류의 글라스 아이오노머와 'alkasite' 계열 수복재의 불소 유리 및 재충전 양상을 비교, 평가하기 위해 시행되었다. 글라스 아이오노머 Fuji IX GP와 Riva Self Cure, 'alkasite' 수복재인 Cention N, 복합레진 Filtek™ Z350XT의 시편을 직경 10.0 mm, 높이 2.0 mm의 원반 형태로 제작하였다. 총 28일간 불소 유리량을 측정한 이후, 각 재료별로 시편을 두 군으로 분류하였다. 실험군에는 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride(APF) gel을 1분간 도포하고, 이후 7일간의 불소 유리량 측정을 통해 대조군과 비교하여 각 재료의 불소 재충전 여부를 평가하였다. 불소 유리량은 Riva Self Cure, Fuji IX GP, Cention N의 순으로 높게 나타났다(p < 0.05). Cention N의 불소 유리량은 Fuji IX GP의 약 49% 수준으로 측정되었다. 또한, Riva Self Cure, Fuji IX GP, Cention N에서 1.23% APF gel의 도포 후 불소 유리량의 증가가 관찰되어(p < 0.05), 글라스 아이오노머뿐 아니라 Cention N에서도 불소의 재충전 양상이 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL : A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent, 26:311-317, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00019-5
  2. Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Leinfelder KF, et al. : Seventeenyear clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent, 11:135-142, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00390.x
  3. Rawls HR : Preventive dental materials: sustained delivery of fluoride and other therapeutic agents. Adv Dent Res, 5:50-55, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374910050010701
  4. McLean JW : Alternatives to amalgam alloys: 1. Br Dent J, 157:432-433, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805511
  5. Um CM, Oilo G : The effect of early water contact on glassionomer cements. Quintessence Int, 23:209-214, 1992.
  6. Kim SM, Park HW, Lee JH, Seo HW : Fluoride release and microhardness of giomer according to time. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:429-437, 2010.
  7. Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N : Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig, 18:1053-1060, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1074-4
  8. De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer EA : Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer formulations. Dent Mater, 12:88-95, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80074-1
  9. Dhondt CL, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM : Fluoride release from glass ionomer activated with fluoride solutions. J Dent Res, 80:1402-1406, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800050301
  10. Lee SY, Dong DR, Huang HM, Shih YH : Fluoride ion diffusion from a glass-ionomer cement. J Oral Rehabil, 27:576-586, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00554.x
  11. Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I : Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J, 6:75-81, 2009.
  12. Tiwari S, Kenchappa M, Gupta M, et al. : Antibacterial activity and fluoride release of glass-ionomer cement, compomer and zirconia reinforced glass-ionomer cement. J Clin Diagn Res, 10:ZC90-93, 2016.
  13. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T : Review on fluoridereleasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343-362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  14. Koch G, Hatibovic-Kofman S : Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vivo. Swed Dent J, 14:267-273, 1990.
  15. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G : Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J, 15:253-258, 1991.
  16. Featherstone JDB, Zero DT : Laboratory and human studies to elucidate the mechanics of action of fluoride-containing dentifrices. Oxford University Press, New York, 41-50, 1992.
  17. Gao W, Smales RJ : Fluoride release/uptake of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers, and compomers. J Dent, 29:301-306, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00053-1
  18. Attar N, Onen A : Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil, 29:791-798, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x
  19. Bertacchini SM, Abate PF, Macchi RL, et al. : Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int, 30:193-197, 1999.
  20. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  21. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK : Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent, 27:259-265, 2002.
  22. Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin F, Swain M : Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. Oper Dent, 36:422-432, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-414-L
  23. Gao W, Smales RJ, Gale MS : Fluoride release/uptake from newer glass-ionomer cements used with the ART approach. Am J Dent, 13:201-204, 2000.
  24. Han L, Cv E, Iwaku M, et al. : Effect of fluoride mouth rinse on fluoride releasing and recharging from aesthetic dental materials. Dent Mater J, 21:285-295, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.285
  25. Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Mair LH : Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil, 26:936-940, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00502.x
  26. Xu X, Burgess JO : Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials, 24:2451-2461, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00638-5
  27. Bilgin Z, Ozalp N : Fluoride release from three different types of glass ionomer cements after exposure to NaF solution and APF gel. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 22:237-241, 1998.
  28. Kim SY, Kim JS, Yoo SH : Comparative study of fluoride release and re-uptake of several restorative materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 34:408-419, 2007.
  29. Attar N, Turgut MD : Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent, 28:395-402, 2003.
  30. Bae IH, Kim JM, Jeong TS, Kim S : Fluoride release and recharge of glass ionomer cements. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32:136-143, 2005.
  31. Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Bansal P, et al. : Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. J Conserv Dent, 22:296-299, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_74_19