Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical Science (영남대 의대 학술지 편집위원회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors to be considered in designing a faculty development program for medical education: local experience from the Western region of Saudi Arabia

  • Algahtani, Hussein (Neurology Section, Department of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences) ;
  • Shirah, Bader (King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences) ;
  • Alshawwa, Lana (Department of Medical Education, King Abdulaziz University) ;
  • Tekian, Ara (Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago) ;
  • Norcini, John (Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research)
  • Received : 2020.03.04
  • Accepted : 2020.04.10
  • Published : 2020.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Among the different aims of medical education, the provision of society with skilled, professional, and knowledgeable healthcare workers who maintain and develop their expertise over a lifetime career is important. The achievement of this goal is linked with the professional development of both faculty members and healthcare workers. This study aims to measure the perception of faculty members regarding their views about the goals of faculty development programs, practices and activities, and factors that determine their achievement. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in multiple universities in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. The participants were given a pre-designed self-administered questionnaire generated from literature. The survey questionnaire consisted of three sections that were designed to assess the faculty members' perception on the faculty development program. Results: A total of 210 faculty members participated in the study. The most important perceived goal was to motivate teachers to become better teachers. The most important perceived practice was establishing a positive climate for teaching and learning. The most important perceived factor was skilled and dedicated staff support. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that faculty members have positive perceptions regarding all aspects of faculty development programs. This study will raise awareness regarding the importance of faculty development programs in sustaining educational vitality. We recommend the implementation and maintenance of comprehensive faculty development programs in Saudi universities.

Keywords

References

  1. Bajammal S, Zaini R, Abuznadah W, Al-Rukban M, Aly SM, Boker A, et al. The need for national medical licensing examination in Saudi Arabia. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-8-53
  2. Telmesani A, Zaini RG, Ghazi HO. Medical education in Saudi Arabia: a review of recent developments and future challenges. East Mediterr Health J 2011;17:703-7. https://doi.org/10.26719/2011.17.8.703
  3. Dath D, Iobst W. The importance of faculty development in the transition to competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010;32:683-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.500710
  4. Simunovic VJ, Hren D, Ivanis A, Dorup J, Krivokuca Z, Ristic S, et al. Survey of attitudes towards curriculum reforms among medical teachers in different socio-economic and cultural environments. Med Teach 2007;29:833-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701589201
  5. Hegde P. Faculty development trends in medical education: a review. South East Asian J Med Educ 2013;7:11-6. https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v7i2.134
  6. Leslie K, Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Esdaile M, Reeves S. Advancing faculty development in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013;88:1038-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29
  7. Bin Abdulrahman KA, Siddiqui IA, Aldaham SA, Akram S. Faculty development program: a guide for medical schools in Arabian Gulf (GCC) countries. Med Teach 2012;34(Suppl 1):S61-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.656748
  8. Steinert Y. Staff development for clinical teachers. Clin Teach 2005;2:104-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2005.00062.x
  9. Steinert Y, McLeod PJ, Boillat M, Meterissian S, Elizov M, Macdonald ME. Faculty development: a 'field of dreams'? Med Educ 2009;43:42-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03246.x
  10. McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach 2008;30:555-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802109834
  11. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1339-44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra055445
  12. Bhatnagar K, Srivastava K, Singh A. Is faculty development critical to enhance teaching effectiveness? Ind Psychiatry J 2010;19:138-41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.90349
  13. Marks MB. Academic careers in medical education: perceptions of the effects of a faculty development program. Acad Med 1999;74(10 Suppl):S72-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00044
  14. Ahmady S. Faculty development in medical education: a comprehensive approach. Stockholm (SE): Karolinska Institutet; 2009.
  15. Puri A, Graves D, Lowenstein A, Hsu L. New faculty's perception of faculty development initiatives at small teaching institutions. Int Sch Res Notices 2012;2012:726270.
  16. Mezirow J. Education for perspectives transformation: women's re-entry programs in community colleges. New York (NY): Teachers College, Columbia University; 1978.
  17. McKeachie WJ. Teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. 10th ed. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin; 1999.
  18. Lueddeke GR. Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and teaching-scholarship. Stud High Educ 2003;28:213-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058082
  19. Sorcinelli MD. Faculty development: the challenge going forward. Peer Rev 2007;9:4-8.
  20. Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-74. 216 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.867