DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Happiness from What We Have and What We Experience: Attribute Non-alignability Increases Anticipated Satisfaction from Experiential Purchases

  • Kim, Minhee (Graduate School of Business Administration, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ahn, Hee-Kyung (School of Business, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.11
  • 심사 : 2020.04.14
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30

초록

This research examines how processing type and alignability moderate the effect of product type on satisfaction (i.e., happiness). It is well known that there are two types of processing-deliberative and intuitive processing. Based on the previous literature that the intuitive processing is compatible with experiential purchases and the deliberative processing is fit with material purchase, the current research demonstrates that processing type moderates the effect of product type on happiness. Moreover, we hypothesize that alignability moderates the effect of product type on anticipated satisfaction. As expected, participants in the intuitive processing condition reported greater happiness from their experiential purchases than material purchases. However, in the deliberative processing condition, there was no significant difference between happiness levels from material and experiential purchases. Furthermore, when the attributes of choice options were presented in a non-alignable manner, participants reported greater anticipated satisfaction from experiential purchases than from material purchases. However, this difference disappeared when attributes were presented in an alignable manner. Finally, we propose 'choice process' satisfaction as a potential mediator of the moderating effect of processing type on the relationship between product type and (anticipated) satisfaction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brenner, Lyle, Yuval Rottenstreich, and Sanjay Sood (1999), "Comparison, Grouping, and Preference," Psychological Science, 10(3), 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00141
  2. Carter, Travis J., and Thomas Gilovich (2010), "The Relative Relativity of Material and Experiential Purchases," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017145
  3. Dhar, Ravi, and Klaus Wertenbroch (2000), "Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Products," Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
  4. Dijksterhuis, Ap, and Loran F. Nordgren (2006), "A Theory of Unconscious Thought." Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x
  5. Dijksterhuis, Ap, and Zeger Van Olden (2006), "On the Benefits of Thinking Unconsciously: Unconscious Thought Can Increase Post-Choice Satisfaction," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 627-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.008
  6. Epstein, Seymour (1994), "Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious," American Psychologist, 49 (8), 709-724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
  7. Gallo, Inigo, Sanjay Sood, Thomas C. Mann, and Thomas Gilovich (2017), "The Heart and the Head: On Choosing Experiences Intuitively and Possessions Deliberatively," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(3), 754-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1997
  8. Hayes, Andrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  9. Holbrook, Morris B., and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
  10. Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto (1982), "Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis," Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1086/208899
  11. Inbar, Yoel, Jeremy Cone, and Thomas Gilovich (2010) "People's Intuitions about Intuitive Insight and Intuitive Choice." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020215
  12. Kahneman, Daniel (2003), "A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality," American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
  13. Kivetz, Ran, and Itamar Simonson (2002), "Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards," Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.155.19084
  14. Kivetz, Ran, and Itmar Simonson (2003), "The idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic: Effort Advantage as a Determinant of Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs," Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.4.454.19383
  15. Kumar, Amit, and Thomas Gilovich (2015), "Some "Thing" to Talk About? Differential Story Utility from Experiential and Material Purchases," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1320-1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594591
  16. Langer, Ellen J. (1989), "Minding Matters: The Consequences of Mindlessness-Mindfulness," Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60307-X
  17. Lee, Jacob C., Deborah L. Hall, and Wendy Wood. (2018), "Experiential or Material Purchases? Social Class Determines Purchase Happiness," Psychological Science, 29(7), 1031-1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617736386
  18. Mano, Haim, and Richard L. Oliver (1993), "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1086/209361
  19. Metcalfe, Janet, and Walter Mischel (1999), "A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower," Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3
  20. Nicolao, Leonardo, Julie R. Irwin, and Joseph K. Goodman (2009), "Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases?", Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1086/597049
  21. Nordgren, Loran F., and Ap Dijksterhuis (2009), "The Devil Is in the Deliberation: Thinking Too Much Reduces Preference Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1086/596306
  22. Nordgren, Loran F., Maarten W. Bos, and Ap Dijksterhuis (2011), "The Best of Both Worlds: Integrating Conscious and Unconscious Thought Best Solves Complex Decisions," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 509-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.007
  23. Rook, Dennis W. (1987), "The Buying Impulse," Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209105
  24. Rook, Dennis W., and Stephen J. Hoch (1985), "Consuming Impulses," Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 23-27.
  25. Rosenzweig, Emily, and Thomas Gilovich (2012), "Buyer's Remorse or Missed Opportunity? Differential Regrets for Material and Experiential Purchases," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024999
  26. Rottenstreich, Yuval, and Christopher K. Hsee (2001), "Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk," Psychological Science, 12(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00334
  27. Rottenstreich, Yuval, Sanjay Sood, and Lyle Brenner (2007), "Feeling and Thinking in Memory Based versus Stimulus Based Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1086/510219
  28. Schwartz, Barry, Andrew T. Ward, John Monterosso, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Katherine White, and Darrin R. Lehman (2002), "Maximizing versus Satisficing: Happiness Is a Matter of Choice," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178-1197. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178
  29. Shiv, Baba, and Joel Huber (2000), "The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1086/314320
  30. Simonson, Itamar (2005), "In Defense of Consciousness: The Role of Conscious and Unconscious Inputs in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_5
  31. Smith, Eliot R., and Jamie DeCoster (2000), "Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems," Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
  32. Stanovich, Keith E., and Richard F. West (2000), "Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
  33. Sun, Jin, Hean Tat Keh, and Angela Y. Lee (2012), "The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Service Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty," Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 831-847. https://doi.org/10.1086/665983
  34. Tully, Stephanie M., Hal E. Hershfield, and Tom Meyvis (2015), "Seeking Lasting Enjoyment with Limited Money: Financial Constraints Increase Preference for Material Products over Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv007
  35. Van Boven, Leaf, and Thomas Gilovich (2003), "To Do or To Have? That Is the Question," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1193
  36. Von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  37. Wilson, Timothy D., Douglas J. Lisle, Jonathan W. Schooler, Sara D. Hodges, Kristen J. Klaaren, Suzanne J. LaFleur (1993), "Introspecting about Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293193010
  38. Zhang, Shi, and Gavan J. Fitzsimons (1999), "Choice-Process Satisfaction: The Influence of Attribute Alignability and Option Limitation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(3), 192-214. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2821
  39. Zhang, Shi, and Arthur B. Markman (1998), "Overcoming the Early Entrant Advantage: The Role of Alignable and Nonalignable Differences," Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152161