DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Incidences of Catheter Colonization and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection According to Tegaderm vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)-Tegaderm Dressing

중심정맥관 번들이행에 따른 중심정맥관 균집락과 중심정맥관 관련 혈류감염: CHG테가덤과 일반테가덤 드레싱비교연구

  • Kim, Eunji (Office of Infection Control, Gyeonggi Provincial Medical Center Ansung Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Haejung (College of Nursing, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2019.10.11
  • Accepted : 2020.06.15
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: In spite of the recent application of a general infection control method, central line-associated infections is still relatively high in Korea. Central line bundle with Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) tegaderm dressing was reported to be effective in reducing catheter colonization and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the incidences of catheter colonization occurrence and CLABSI while using Tegaderm vs. CHG Tegaderm dressings. Methods: We used a descriptive design. 400 patients who had central venous catheters were selected from four hospitals in the Korean National Healthcare-associated Infections Surveillance System. Of all subjects, 200 used Tegaderm™ (Tegaderm group), and the remaining 200 used CHG Tegaderm (CHG Tegaderm group) dressing at the catheter insertion site. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, t-test, and logistic regression analysis using SPSS WIN 21.0. Results: In the Tegaderm and CHG Tegaderm groups, CLABSI incidences were 5.89 and 1.79 per 1,000 catheter-days, catheter colonization incidences were 3.93 and 1.43 per 1,000 catheter-days, and central line bundle compliance rates were 26.0% and 49.0%, respectively. Catheter colonization risk factors were 'reinsertion after failure' and 'Tegaderm dressing' at the central line insertion site. CLABSI risk factors were 'incomplete performance of 7 central line bundle items' and 'Tegaderm dressing' at the central line insertion site. Conclusion: A further prospective study is needed to examine the effects of central line bundle with CHG Tegaderm dressing, avoiding central line reinsertion after failure, and improving the bundle compliance in reducing catheter colonization and CLABSI.

Keywords

References

  1. Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, McGarry SA, Trivette SL, Briggs JP, et al. Health care-associated bloodstream infections in adults: A reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(10):791-797. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-10-200211190-00007
  2. Kim EC. Current status of healthcare-associated infections in Korea. Hanyang Medical Reviews. 2011;31(3):135-140. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2011.31.3.135
  3. Gershengorn HB, Garland A, Kramer A, Scales DC, Rubenfeld G, Wunsch H. Variation of arterial and central venous catheter use in United States intensive care units. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):650-664. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008
  4. Cho EE, Bevilacqua E, Brewer J, Hassett J, Guo WA. Variation in the practice of central venous catheter and chest tube insertions among surgery residents. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2018;11(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_124_15
  5. Brasher C, Malbezin S. Central venous catheters in small infants. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(1):4-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001961
  6. Suljagic V, Cobeljic M, Jankovic S, Mirovic V, Markovic-Denic L, Romic P, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in ICU and non-ICU patients. American Journal of Infection Control. 2005;33(6):333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.010
  7. Ridgway JP, Sun X, Tabak YP, Johannes RS, Robicsek A. Performance characteristics and associated outcomes for an automated surveillance tool for bloodstream infection. American Journal of Infection Control. 2016;44(5):567-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.044
  8. Aloush SM, Alsaraireh FA. Nurses' compliance with central line associated blood stream infection prevention guidelines. Saudi Medical Journal. 2018;39(3):273-279. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.3.21497
  9. Hallam C, Jackson T, Rajgopal A, Russell B. Establishing catheter-related bloodstream infection surveillance to drive improvement. Journal of Infection Prevention. 2018;19(4):160-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177418767759
  10. Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Critical Care Medicine. 2006;34(8):2084-2089. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000227648.15804.2D
  11. Nowak JE, Brilli RJ, Lake MR, Sparling KW, Butcher J, Schulte M, et al. Reducing catheter-associated bloodstream infections in the pediatric intensive care unit: Business case for quality improvement. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2010;11(5):579-587. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181d90569
  12. Pepin CS, Thom KA, Sorkin JD, Leekha S, Masnick M, Preas MA, et al. Risk factors for central-line-associated bloodstream infections: A focus on comorbid conditions. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2015;36(4):479-481. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2014.81
  13. Rosado V, Romanelli RM, Camargos PA. Risk factors and preventive measures for catheter-related bloodstream infections. Jornal de Pediatria. 2011;87(6):469-477. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2134
  14. Korean Society for Healthcare-associated Infection Control and Prevention (KOSHIC). KONIS manual 2018 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Society for Healthcare-associated Infection Control and Prevention (KOSHIC); c2018 [cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: http://konis.cafe24.com/xe/index.php?mid=manual&-category=251&document_srl=653.
  15. Kwak YG, Choi YH, Choi JY, Yoo HM, Lee SO, Kim HB, et al. Korean National Health care-Associated Infections Surveillance System, intensive care unit module report: Summary of data from July 2016 through June 2017. Korean Journal of Healthcare-Associated Infection Control and Prevention. 2018;23(2):25-38. https://doi.org/10.14192/kjhaicp.2018.23.2.25
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data summary of HAIs in the US: Assessing progress 2006-2016 for CLABSI [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); c2017 [cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/data-summary-assessing-progress.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fhai%2Fsurveillance%2Fdata-reports%2Fdata-summary-assessing-progress.html
  17. Cho HJ, Choi YH, Shin SS, Oh YJ, Hwang SC. Central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection: Influence of catheter insertion site and duration. Infection & Chemotherapy. 2005;37(2):65-70.
  18. Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Critical Care. 2005;9(6):R631-R635. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3824
  19. Kim KS, Kim S, Ji S, Lee J. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in intensive care unit in a general hospital. Korean Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;29(1):70-79.
  20. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K. Femoral venous catheterization is a major risk factor for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2009;22(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941930802566698
  21. Moon HJ, Cho YS, Kim HJ, Lim H, Lee MG, Yoo B, et al. Comparison of infection rates for central venous catheters administered in an intensive care unit versus an emergency department. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2011;22(6):669-675.
  22. Haga Y, Miyanari N, Takahashi T, Koike S, Kobayashi R, Mizusawa H, et al. Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections in adult hospitalized patients - multicenter cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2013;45(10):773-779. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2013.807936
  23. Buchman AL, Opilla M, Kwasny M, Diamantidis TG, Okamoto R. Risk factors for the development of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2014;38(6):744-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607113491783
  24. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection, 2011 [Internet]. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP); c2015 [cited 2019 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/BSI/index.html
  25. Choe PG, Shin HY, Shin MJ, Song KH, Kim ES, Jin HY, et al. P003: Current status of infection control practice for prevent of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in Korea. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2013;2(Suppl 1):P3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-P3
  26. Jenks M, Craig J, Green W, Hewitt N, Arber M, Sims A. Tegaderm CHG IV securement dressing for central venous and arterial catheter insertion sites: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2016;14(2):135-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0202-5
  27. Arvaniti K, Lathyris D, Clouva-Molyvdas P, Haidich AB, Mouloudi E, Synnefaki E, et al. Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40(2):420-429. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0d4b
  28. Timsit JF, Mimoz O, Mourvillier B, Souweine B, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Alfandari S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2012;186(12):1272-1278. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201206-1038OC
  29. Lai NM, Lai NA, O'Riordan E, Chaiyakunapruk N, Taylor JE, Tan K. Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;7(7):CD010140. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010140.pub2
  30. Dolci ME, Margatho AS, Silveira RC. Frequency of change of chlorhexidine-impregnated gel dressings for central venous catheters in critically ill patients. Escola Anna Nery. 2017;21(4):e20170026. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0026
  31. Ergul AB, Gokcek I, Ozcan A, Cetin S, Gultekin N, Torun YA. Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduced catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-positive microorganisms. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;34(2):347-351. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.342.14810
  32. Eggimann P, Pagani JL, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Ms BE, Thevenin MJ, Joseph C, et al. Sustained reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections with enhancement of catheter bundle by chlorhexidine dressings over 11 years. Intensive Care Medicine. 2019;45(6):823-833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05617-x
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated recommendations on the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections 2017 [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); c2017 [cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/bsi/c-i-dressings/index.html
  34. Wei L, Li Y, Li X, Bian L, Wen Z, Li M. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for the prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(1):429. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4029-9
  35. Park KH. Diagnosis and management of central venous catheter-related infections. The Korean Journal of Medicine. 2014;86(3):282-294. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2014.86.3.282
  36. Theodoro D, Olsen MA, Warren DK, McMullen KM, Asaro P, Henderson A, et al. Emergency department central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) incidence in the era of prevention practices. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015;22(9):1048-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12744
  37. Lee KH, Cho NH, Jeong SJ, Kim MN, Han SH, Song YG. Effect of central line bundle compliance on central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2018;59(3):376-382. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.3.376
  38. Tomar S, Lodha R, Das B, Sood S, Kapil A. Risk factors for central line associated bloodstream infections. Indian Pediatrics. 2016;53(9):790-792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0932-y