Environmental Engineering Research

Korean Society of Environmental Engineers (대한환경공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Novel adsorption model of filtration process in polycarbonate track-etched membrane: Comparative study

  • Adda, Asma (Laboratory of Biomaterials and Transport Phenomena (LBMPT), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Dr Yahia fares Medea) ;
  • Hanini, Salah (Laboratory of Biomaterials and Transport Phenomena (LBMPT), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Dr Yahia fares Medea) ;
  • Abbas, Mohamed (Unit of Solar Equipments Development-UDES/EPST CDER) ;
  • Sediri, Meriem (Laboratory of Biomaterials and Transport Phenomena (LBMPT), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Dr Yahia fares Medea)
  • Received : 2019.04.04
  • Accepted : 2019.07.06
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current assumptions are used in the formulation of pseudo-first (PFO) and second-order (PSO) models to describe the kinetic data of filtration based on ideal operating conditions. This paper presents a new model developed with pseudo nth order and based on real assumption. A comparison was performed between PFO, PSO and the new model to highlight their performance and the optimisation of the pseudo-order equation, using MATLAB software. Adsorption characteristic of bovine serum albumin adsorption on the track-etched membrane are used as a medium based on protein filtration data were extracted from the literature for different concentrations to demonstrate the comparison between PFO/PSO and the new model. The pseudo first and second-order kinetic models were applied to test the experimental data and they did not provide reasonable values. The results show that the predicted values are consistent with experimental values giving a good correlation coefficient R2 = 0.997 and a minimum root mean squared error RMSE = 0.0171. Indeed, the experimental results follow the new model and the optimal pseudo equation order n = 1.115, the most suitable curves for the new model. As a result, we used different experimental adsorption data from the literature to examine and check the applicability and validity of the model.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Amoudi AS. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membrane: A review. Desalination 2010;259:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.003
  2. Gavach M. Detoxification of reverse osmosis distillery condensates ion exchange and their combination Application to recycling in alcoholic fermentation [dissertation]. Paris: Univ. of Paris Tech; 2010.
  3. Shaikh RA, Hamed K, Tomohisa Y, Hideto M, Hiromitsu T, Da-Ming W. Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on poly(vinylidene fluoride) surfaces in the presence of ions: A molecular dynamics simulation. Phys. Chem. J. 2018;122:191-1928.
  4. Nakamura K, Matsumoto K. Protein adsorption properties on microfiltration membrane: A comparison between static and dynamic adsorption methods. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;285:126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.012
  5. Delmas H, Manole C, Wilhelm AM. AD-OX: A sequential oxidative process for water treatment adsorption and batch CWAO regeneration of activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;152:189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.040
  6. Tan KL, Hameed BH. Insight into the adsorption kinetics models for the removal of contaminants from aqueous solutions. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017;74:25-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.024
  7. Lagergren S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffe, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1928;24:1-39.
  8. Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G. Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res. 1984;18:1501-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(84)90124-6
  9. Gosset T, Trancart JL, Thevenot DR. Batch metal removal by peat: Kinetics and thermodynamics. Water Res. 1986;20:21-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90209-5
  10. Ho YS. Second-order kinetic model for the sorption of cadmium onto tree fern: A comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Water Res. 2006;40:119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.040
  11. Kumar KV, Sivanesan S. Selection of optimum sorption kinetics:Comparison of linear and non-linear methods.J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;134:277-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.003
  12. Ho YS, Ofomaja AE. Kinetic studies of copper ion adsorption on palm kernel fiber. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;137:1796-1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.023
  13. Fang F, Satulovsky J, Szleifer I. Kinetics of protein adsorption and desorption on surfaces with grafted polymers. Biophys. J. 2005;89:1516-1533. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.055079
  14. Simonin JP. On the comparison of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order rate laws in the modeling of adsorption kinetics. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;300:254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.079
  15. Xiao CW, Liu XJ, Mao SM, Zhang LJ, Lu J. Sub-micron-sized polyethylenimine modified polystyrene/Fe3O4/chitosan magnetic composites for the efficient and recyclable adsorption of Cu(II) ions. Appl .Surf. Sci. 2017;394:378-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.116
  16. Chen J, Shi X, Zhan Y, Qiu X, Du Y, Deng H. Construction of horizontal stratum landform-like composite foams and their methyl orange adsorption capacity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;397:133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.211
  17. Tu H, Huang MT, Yi Y, et al. Chitosan-rectorite nanospheres immobilized on polystyrene fibrous mats via alternate electrospinning/electrospraying techniques for copper ions adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;426:545-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.159
  18. Huang MT, Tu H, Chen J, et al. Chitosan-rectorite nanospheres embedded aminated polyacrylonitrile nanofibers via shoulder-to-shoulder electrospinning and electrospraying for enhanced heavy metal removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;437:294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.150
  19. Tseng RL, Wua PH, Feng CW, Ruey SJ. A convenient method to determine kinetic parameters of adsorption processes by nonlinear regression of pseudo-nth-order equation. Chem. Eng. 2014;237:153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.013
  20. Xu TW, Fu RQ, Yan LF. A new insight into the adsorption of bovine serum albumin onto porous polyethylene membrane by zeta potential measurements, FTIR analysis and AFM observations. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2003;262:342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00208-X
  21. Anirudhan TS, Tharun AR, Rejeena SR. Investigation on poly (methacrylic acid)-grafted cellulose/bentonite superabsorbent composite: Synthesis, characterization, and adsorption characteristics of bovine serum albumin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011;50:1866-1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101918m
  22. Wang Z, Yue T, Yuan Y, Cai R, Niu C, Guo C. Kinetics of adsorption of bovine serum albumin on magnetic carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;58:57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.037
  23. Sasidharan NP, Chandran P, SudheerKh S. Interaction of colloidal zinc oxide nanoparticles with bovine serum albumin and its adsorption isotherms and kinetics. Colloid. Surf. B: Biointerf. 2013;102:195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.034
  24. Devillers J. Neural network in QSAR and drug design. 1st ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
  25. Zupan J, Gasteiger J. Neural networks in chemistry and drug design. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH VerlagGmbh; 1999.
  26. Fu RQ, Xu TW, Pan ZX. Modeling of the adsorption of bovine serum albumin on porous polyethylene membrane by back-propagation artificial neural network. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;251:137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.11.007
  27. Ho CC, Zydney AL. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. J. 2000;232:389-399. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7231
  28. Tien C, Ramarao B. Revisiting the laws of filtration: An assessment of their use in identifying particle retention mechanisms in filtration. Membr. Sci. J. 2011;383:17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.019
  29. Ho YS, McKay G. A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Proc. Saf. Environ. J. 1998;76:332-340. https://doi.org/10.1205/095758298529696
  30. Ho YS, McKay G. Comparative sorption kinetic studies of dyes and aromatic compounds onto fly ash. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 1999;34:1179-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529909376889
  31. Ho YS, McKay G. The kinetics of sorption of divalent metal ions onto sphagnum moss peat. Water Res. 2000;34:735-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00232-8
  32. Dastkhoon M, Mehrorang G, Arash A, Azqhandi MHA, Purkait MK. Simultaneous removal of dyes onto nanowires adsorbent use of ultra-round assisted adsorption to clean wastewater chemometrics for modeling and optimization, multicomponent adsorption and kinetics study. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017;124:222-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.06.011
  33. Foo KY, Hameed BH. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;156:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013
  34. Mall ID, Srivastava VC, Agarwal NK. Removal of orange-G and methyl violet dyes by adsorption onto bagasse fly ash-kinetic study and equilibrium isotherm analyses. Dyes Pigm. 2006;69:210-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.03.013
  35. Vishnuvardhan TR, Sachin C, Saswati C. Adsorption isotherm and kinetics analysis of hexavalent chromium and mercury on mustard oil cake. Environ. Eng. Res. 2017;22:95-107. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.094
  36. Kong S, Aucamp J, Titchener-Hooker NJ. Studies on membrane sterile filtration of plasmid DNA using an automated multiwell technique. J. Membr. Sci. 2010;353:144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.043
  37. Fouladitajar A, Ashtiani FZ , Okhovat A, Dahir B. Membrane fouling in microfiltration of oil in water emulsion; comparison between constant pressure blocking laws and genetic programming (GP) model. Desalination 2013;329:41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.003
  38. Iritani E, Nobuyuki K, Takenaka T, Yamashita Y. Membrane pore blocking during cake formation in constant pressure and constant flux dead-end microfiltration of very dilute colloids. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015;122:465-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.052
  39. Winans JD, Smith KJP, Gaborski TR, Roussie JA, McGrath JL. Membrane capacity and fouling mechanisms for ultrathin nanomembranes in dead-end filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2016;499:282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.053
  40. Huo JH, Peng ZG, Ye ZB, et al. Investigation of synthesized polymer on the rheological and filtration performance of water based drilling fluid system. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2018;165:655-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.003

Cited by

  1. Modeling and optimization of small-scale NF/RO seawater desalination using the artificial neural network (ANN) vol.27, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2020.383