농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제26권3호
  • /
  • Pages.103-113
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공간계량모형을 이용한 도시와 농촌의 비선호시설이 토지 가격에 미치는 영향 분석

The Effects of Non-Preferred Facilities on Land Prices in Urban and Rural Areas using Spatial Econometrics

  • 전정배 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원) ;
  • 권성문 (대구대학교 도시.조경학부)
  • Jeon, Jeongbae (Spatial Information Research Institute, Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation) ;
  • Kwon, Sung Moon (Division of Urban Landscape, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.29
  • 심사 : 2020.08.24
  • 발행 : 2020.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Land price can be affected by convenience or psychological repulsion like PIMFY (Please In My Front Yard) or NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) for various facilities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether non-preferred facilities are related to NIMBY impact that negatively affect land prices using the spatial econometrics models which are spatial autoregressive models (SAR), spatial errors models (SEM), and general spatial model (SAC). The land price in urban area increases by 0.07-0.2% when the distance from aversion facilities increases by 1%. However, the land price in rural areas decreases when the distance from aversion or pollution facilities increase. Therefore, these facilities in rural areas located in the areas with higher land price because funeral homes located in center of rural administrative areas and charnel house or crematorium located in the fringe of urban areas. That is, this study explain the difference between land price and non-preferred facilities in urban and rural areas and why there are more N IMBY symptoms in urban areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andrew J. Plantinga, Ruben N. Lubowski, and Robert N. Stavins, 2002, The effect of potential land development on agricultural land prices, Journal of Urban Economics, 52:561-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00503-X
  2. Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Method and Models, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Anselin, L. and Sergio, J. R., 2014. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC
  4. Askew, I., 1983. The location of service facilities in rural areas: A model for generating and evaluating alternative solutions. Regional Studies, 17(5): 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238300185321
  5. Bergeijk, P. and S.M. Murshes, 2012. The Relation between Land Price and Distance to CBD in Bekasi. International Institute of Social Studies.
  6. Can, A., 1992. Specification and Estimation of Hedonic Housing Price Model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(3): 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90039-4
  7. Choi, H. S., 2012. A Study on the Influencing Facors of Location Conflicts by Types of Non-preferred Facilities, Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 25(4): 123-151.
  8. Cowell, P. F., S. S. Gujral., & C. Coley., 1985. The impact of a shopping center on the value of surrounding properties. Real Estate Issues, 10(1): 35-39.
  9. Dubin, R.A., 1988. Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp.466-474.
  10. Dubin, R.A., 1992. Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(3), pp.433-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90038-3
  11. Gillen, R., Tennen, H., McKee, T.E., Gernert-Dott, P. and Affleck, G., 2001. Depressive symptoms and history of depression predict rehabilitation efficiency in stroke patients. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 82(12): 1645-1649. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26249
  12. Jang, I. S., 2016. The impact of plan chranteristics of residentail land development project on inner land price chage. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(8): 698-705 https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.8.698
  13. Jeon, J. B., Kim, S. H., Suh, K., Park, M. J., Choi, J. A., & Yoon, S. S., 2016. Accessibility to public service facilities in rural area by public transportation system. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 22(4): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2016.22.4.001
  14. Jyoung, S. and H. Park, 2003. A Study on Unwelcomed Facilities' Effects of Land Price: A Case Study of Waste Plant in Nowon-Gu. Journal of Korean Real Estate Analysis Association. 9(2): 87-99.
  15. Kim, C. and P. Byeon, 2011. Retirement of Baby boom generation and the strategy for revitalization or rural area in Korea. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  16. Kim, J., 2012. An panel analysis of NIMBY effect on land price: Seoul Metropolitan Memorial case. The Korean Local Administration Review. 26(4): 275-296.
  17. Kim, K., Jung, C., Ryu, J., and J. Kim, 2005. A Study on the Correlativity Between Land Price and Residental Environment Elements -Focusing on the Haeundae-Gu and Suyoung-Gu in Busan City-, Journal of the Korean Geographic Information Society, 78(1): 52-60.
  18. Kim, S. and K. Chung, 2010, The Robust Estimation with Spatial Econometrics Models using 3-Dimension Weight Matrix considering the Height of the House, Housing Studies Review, 18(3): 73-92
  19. Kim, S. and G. Jung, 2010, Comparative Study of the Fitness between Traditional OLS Models and Spatial Econometrics Models Using the Real Transaction Housing Price in the Busan, The Journal of Korea Real Estate Analysists Association, 16(3): 41-55.
  20. Kim, S. and G. Jung, 2010, The Appraisal of Hedonic Price Models to the Housing Policy: focused on the Spatial Econometrics Models, Journal of the Policy Analysis and Evaluation Society, 20(3): 115-134.
  21. Kim, S. H., Kim, T. G. and Suh, K., 2016, Analysis of the Implication of accessibility to community facilities for land price in rural areas using a hedonic land price model, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 22(1): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2016.22.1.093
  22. Lee, J., Kwon, H., Kim, Y., and M. Lee, 2007.Causal Loop Diagramming of Location Conflict on LULU (Locally Unwanted Land Use) Facilities and Policy Alternatives, Korean system dynamics review, 8(1): 151-171.
  23. Lee, S., Yoon, S., Park, J., and S. Min, 2005. Application of Spatial Econometrics Model, Pakyoungsa.
  24. Lee, Y., 2008. A Review of the Hedonic Price Model. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association. 14(1): 81-87.
  25. Li, M. M., & H. J. Brown, 1980. Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing price. Land Economics, 56(2): 125-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145857
  26. Lin, C. C., Chen, C. L. and Twu, Y. C., 2012. An Estimation of the Impact of Feng-Shui on Housing Prices in Taiwan︰ A Quantile Regression Application. International Real Estate Review, 15(3): 325-346.
  27. Maddison, D., 2000. A hedonic analysis of agricultural land prices in England and Wales. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(4): 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/27.4.519
  28. Matthews, J. W., & G. K. Turnbull., 2007. Neighborhood Street Layout and Property Value: The Interaction of Accessibility and Land Use Mix. The Journal of Real estate Finance and Economics, 35(2): 111-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9035-9
  29. Morell, D., 1987. "Siting and Politics of Equity", Resolving Locational Conflict, New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research.
  30. Ministry of Government Legislation(MGL), 2020, https://law.go.kr/
  31. Park, S. and H. Lee, 2009. A Study on the Relation of Factory Location and Land Price. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association. 25(1): 75-94.
  32. Ready, R.C. and Abdalla, C.W., 2005. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: estimates from a hedonic pricing model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2): 314-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00724.x
  33. Reichert, A.K., 1997. Impact of a toxic waste superfund site on property values. Appraisal Journal, 65: 381-392.
  34. Rosen, S., 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy. 82(1): 11-17.
  35. Song, Y., & J. Sohn., 2007. Valuing Spatial Accessibility to Retailing: A Case Study of The Single Family Housing Market in Hillsboro, Oregon. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(4): 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.07.002
  36. Song, Y. C., and Park, H. S., 2012, A study on the estimation of farmland price using spatial econometrics approch: Focused on urban fringe in seoul metropolitan area, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 72: 121-140. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2012.72..007
  37. Suh, K., 2005, Analysis of determinant factors of land price in rural area using a hedonic land price model and spatial econometric models. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 11(3): 11-17.
  38. Tobler, W.R., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46(2): 234-240 https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
  39. Wang, M. and Li, B., 2016, Legal regulation of NIMBY conflict in China, Legal Change and Impact on Communities. Oxford Scholarship Online
  40. Zhang, L., Chen, J., Hao, Q. and Li, C.Z., 2018. Measuring the NIMBY effect in urban China: the case of waste transfer stations in metropolis Shanghai. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9565-2