Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detection of Knowledge Structure of Korean Studies Using Document Co-citation Analysis: the Difference between Self-perception and Others' Perception

문헌동시인용 분석을 통한 한국학 지식구조 파악: 주체 인식과 타자 인식의 차이

  • 김혜진 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2020.02.27
  • Accepted : 2020.03.18
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to detect the knowledge structure of Korean studies using document co-citation analysis and text mining techniques. This study divided Korean corpus into two perspectives: Self-perceived and others' perceived Korean studies. To this end, we collected 10,929 humanities and social literature containing the word Korea or Korean as a keyword in the SCOPUS database. As a result of analysis, a total of 20 subdomains were found in the knowledge structure of self-perception, and a total of 14 subdomains were found in the knowledge structure of otherts' perception. Differences in Korean Studies between two are: First, the sub-area of self-perceived Korean studies is subdivided into more diverse areas than the sub-area of other-perceived Korean studies. Second the major areas in self-perceived Korean studies are customers and services, industrialization, multiculturalism, mental health, tourism, Korean language, environment, and cities. Others' perceptions of Korean Studies are grouped into domestic and foreign situations of Korea, Korean pop culture, Koreans as US immigrants, and Korean language. Finally, the common areas of self-perception and others' perception were mental health, tourism, Korean language, North-Korean defectors, and juvenile delinquency.

한국학의 연구 범위는 한국의 역사, 문학, 정치, 사회, 경제, 종교 등 한국과 관련된 모든 영역을 망라하고 있다. 본 연구는 문헌동시인용 분석과 텍스트마이닝 기법을 사용하여 한국학 지식구조를 정의하였다. 그리고 한국학을 다룬 주체에 따라 한국에서 논의된 한국 연구를 주체 인식 한국학, 한국 이외의 지역에서 논의된 한국 연구를 타자 인식 한국학으로 나누어 하위영역을 비교·분석하였다. 이를 위해서 SCOPUS 데이터베이스에서 'Korea' 또는 'Korean' 이라는 단어를 키워드로 포함하고 있는 인문·사회 분야 문헌 10,929건을 수집하였다. 분석결과 주체 인식 한국학의 지식구조에서는 총 20개의 하위영역이 발견되었고, 타자 인식 한국학의 지식구조에서는 총 14개의 하위영역이 발견되었다. 주체 인식의 한국학과 타자 인식의 한국학의 하위영역 구성에 있어서 차이점은 첫째, 주체 인식 한국학의 하위영역이 타자 인식 한국학의 하위영역보다 더 다양한 영역으로 세분되어 있다는 것, 둘째, 주체 인식 한국학은 마케팅/소비자와 서비스, 산업화, 다문화, 정신건강, 관광, 한국어, 환경과 도시 등이 주요 영역을 차지하고 있고, 타자 인식 한국학은 크게 한국 대내외의 상황, 한국 대중문화, 미국 이민자로서의 한국인, 한국어/한국어 습득이 주요 영역을 차지하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 주체 인식과 타자 인식에서 공통적으로 보이는 영역은 정신건강, 관광, 한국어, 탈주민, 청소년 비행 등이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Beom-mo. 2010. "Constructing Networks of Related Concepts Based on Co-occurring Nouns." Korean Semantics, 32: 1-28
  2. Kwak, Sun-Young and EunKyung Chung. 2012. "Domain analysis on economics by utilizing cocitation analysis of multiple authorship." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1): 115-134. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.115
  3. Kim, Gwang Jae and Bellnine Park. 2011. "Intellectual Structure of Innovation Diffusion Research in the Communication Discipline." Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 25(6): 52-87.
  4. Kim, SukDeug. 1983. "The Koreanology and Linguistics in France." The Dong Bang Hak Chi, 39: 253-258.
  5. Kim, Seung Hwan. 2010. "Concept and Classification of Korean Studies." Korean Language, 47: 283-307.
  6. Kim, Young-joon and Chae-hwan Kim. 2007. "Mapping the intellectual structure of communication research field in Korea : An author co-citation analysis, 1989-2006." Korean Journal of Communication Studies, 15(3): 155-184.
  7. Kim, Young-Jin (1986. "A study on the intellectual structure using cocitation analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 3(1): 103-135.
  8. Kim, Yun Tae. 2006. "The Recent Trends of Korean Studies in China." Journal of Sinology and China Studies, 38: 77-91.
  9. Kim, Jae Wook, Hyang Mi Kim, So Young Lee, and Jin Hwa Rhee. 2008. "Research Trend and Knowledge Structure of Relationship Marketing - Based on Authors Co-citation Analysis and Social Network Analysis to identify Authors Relationship -." Korean Marketing Review, 23(3): 1-35.)
  10. Kim, Jo-Ah, and Lee Jae Yun. 2016. Analyzing the research fronts of women's studies in Korea using citation image makers profiling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(2): 201-225. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.201
  11. Kim, Hyeon. 2013. "Digital Humanities - Cooperative Scheme between Humanities and Cultural Contents -." Humanities Contents, (29): 9-26.
  12. Kim, Hee-Jeon and Hyun-Yang Cho. 2010. "A Study on Intellectual Structure Using Author Co-Citation Analysis and Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis in the Field of Social Welfare Science." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3): 283-306. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.283
  13. Kim, Hee-Jung. 2005. "A Study on Comparison of Intellectual Structure in Records Management and Archives Using Author Cocitation Analysis." Journal of the Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 39(3): 207-224. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.3.207
  14. Park, Yong Shin. 1983. "A Note on Korean Studies in the United Kingdom." The Dong Bang Hak Chi, 39: 247-252.
  15. Park, Jung Shin. 1999. "The Trends of Korean Studies in the United States." Sungshin Humanaties Research, 18: 23-32.
  16. Song, Min-Sun. 2015. "A Study on the Intellectual Structure Analysis in Korean Studies." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4): 125-157. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.125
  17. Song, Min Sun and Young Man Ko. 2015. "A Study on the Macro Analysis of Knowledge Structure of the Domestic Korean Studies for Identifying the Research Fields." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3): 221-236. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.221
  18. Song, Hyun Ho. 2012. "General Information of Korean Studies in China." Studies of Chinese & Korean Humanities, 35: 463-504.
  19. Song, Hyun Ho. 2013. "Status and Tasks of Korean Studies at Minzu University of China." Studies of Korean &Chinese Humanities, 40: 329-354.
  20. Yang, DongHoon. 2019. "A Study on the Status and Characteristics of Master's and Doctorate Graduation theses on Korean Studies in China." The Journal of Asian Studies. 22(1): 175-198. https://doi.org/10.21740/jas.2019.02.22.1.175
  21. Czoj, Ogarek. 1990. "The Trends of Korean Studies in Poland." Asia Culture, 6: 209-212.
  22. Lee, Byung Do. 2003. "Current Status and Research Problem of Korean Studies in Thailand." Korean Review of International Area Studies, 2: 173-193.
  23. Lee, Soo-Sang. 2010. "A preliminary study on the co-author network analysis of Korean library and information science research community." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2): 297-315. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.41.2.201006.297
  24. Lee, Jae Yun. 2015. "Identifying the Research Fronts in Korean Library and Information Science by Document Co-citation Analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4): 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077
  25. Lee, Jae Yun. 2017. "Deep Learning Research Trends Analysis with Ego Centered Topic Citation Analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(4): 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.007
  26. Lee, Jeonghwan and Jae Yeol Lee. 2013. "Analysis of the research on augmented reality using knowledge domain visualization based on co-citation analysis." Transactions of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers, 18(5): 309-320. https://doi.org/10.7315/CADCAM.2013.309
  27. Lim, Ji-young and EunKyung Chung. 2016. "A study on the identification of intellectual structure in the field of cardiovascular medicine." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(1): 111-134. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.1.111
  28. Lim, Hyun-Chin and Il-Joon Chung. 2012. "Korean Studies in Sociology: In Search of a Strategy for Globalizing Korean Studies." Journal of Korean Studies, 43: 461-494. https://doi.org/10.17790/kors.2012..43.461
  29. Chun, Sung Woon. 2010. "The Conception of Korean Study and Its Ways of Globalization." Journal of Korean Studies, 32: 317-337. https://doi.org/10.17790/kors.2010.32..317
  30. Choi, Key Sook. 2011. "The Inter-Relationship between the Korean Studies and the Research Vision of the Dept. of College of Humanities in Korean Universities During 1950-1960's: Concept․Category․Methodology - Focusing on the Academic Journals." Yeol-Sang Journal of Classical Studies, 33: 265-301. https://doi.org/10.15859/yscs..33.201106.265
  31. Ham, Dong Ju. 2001. "Korean Studies Trends and Awareness about Korea in Japan." Ewha Sahak Yeongu, 28: 197-215.
  32. Heo, Go Eun, & Min Song. 2013. "Examining the intellectual structure of a medical informatics journal with author co-citation analysis and co-word analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207
  33. Blondel, V. D., J. L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte and E. Lefebvre. 2008. "Fast unfolding of communities in large networks." Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10): P10008.
  34. Bonacich, P. 2007. "Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality." Social Networks, 29(4): 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
  35. Elmacioglu, E., and D. Lee. 2005. "On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more." ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(2): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1083784.1083791
  36. Garfield, E. 1979. "Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?." Scientometrics, 1(4): 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019306
  37. Small, H. 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents". Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4): 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  38. Song, M., Kim, E. H.-J., and H. J. Kim. 2015. "Exploring author name disambiguation on PubMed-scale." Journal of Informetrics, 9(4): 924-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.004
  39. White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1981. "Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure." Journal of the American Society for information Science, 32(3): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  40. White, H. D., and K. W. McCain. 1998. "Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995." Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4): 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4