Journal of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회지:중재연구)

The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

'Artificial Intelligence' Acceptability in Online Dispute Resolution: A Comparison Study of Korean Age Groups

  • Chung, Yongkyun (Department of International Trade and Business, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2020.08.20
  • Accepted : 2020.08.31
  • Published : 2020.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The worldwide diffusion of COVID-19 contributes to electronic commerce all over the world. The proliferation of high volume and small value electronic commerce naturally has combined artificial intelligence with online dispute resolution (ODR). This paper investigates the age effect on Artificial Intelligence acceptability in online dispute resolution and its empirical findings are as follows. First, seven measures out of the nine employed in this case study shows a coherent dynamic pattern over the age spectrum. In other words, the total samples are a heterogenous group rather than a homogeneous one. Second, medium answer occupies a non-negligible portion across answers from nine research questions. It seems to indicate that a considerable portion of Korean respondents are hesitant to make a choice on artificial intelligence at this juncture. Third, all of the respondents agree that the introduction of AI to the dispute resolution could contribute to the hastening of the dispute resolution process. Fourth, most of the respondents agree that artificial intelligence might have the cognitive ability but not the sympathetic or affective ability to handle the electronic commerce disputes.

Keywords

References

  1. Benett, S., and Maton, K., "Beyond Digital Natives' Debates: Towads a More Nuanced Understanding of Students' Technology Experiments", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.26, No.5, 2010.
  2. Bemmels, B., "Arbitrator Characteristics and Arbitrator Decisions", Journal of Labor Research, Vol.11, No.2, 1990.
  3. Briggs, S. and Anderson, C., "An Empirical Investigation of Arbitrator Acceptability", Industrial Relations, Vol.19, No.2, 1980.
  4. Carneiro, Davide, Novais, Paulo, Andrade, Francisco, Zeleznikow, John and Neves, Jose, "The Legal Precedent in Online Dispute Resolution", 2009.
  5. Jose, "Online Dispute Resolution: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective", Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, 2014.
  6. Carper, Donald and LaRocco, John, "What Parties Might Be Giving Up and Gaining When Deciding Not to Litigate, A Comparison of Litigation Arbitration and Mediation", Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol.63, No.2, 2008.
  7. Chung, Yongkyun, "A Study of Antecedents of Objective and Subjective Trust in Internet Shopping Mall", The e-Business Studies, Vol.10, No.1, 2009.
  8. Chung, Yongkyun, "Combining Arbitration with Mediation: Two Cultures of China and Malaysia", Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol. 26, No.3, 2016.
  9. Chung, Yongkyun, "Are College Students Digital Natives?: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea", Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.19, No.2, 2019.
  10. Chung, Yongkyun, "Artificial Intelligence and the Virtual Multi-Door ODR Platform for Small Value Cross-Border e-Commerce Disputes", Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol. 29, No.3, 2019.
  11. Chung, Yongkyun and Ha-Hong-Youl, The Modelling Effects of Fairness of Arbitration and Speed of Arbitration on Korean Traders' Attitudes towards Arbitration, Journal of Korea Trade, Vol.18, No.2, 2014.
  12. Chung, Yongkyun and Ha-Hong-Youl, "Arbitrator Acceptability in International Commercial Arbitration: Trading Firm Perspective", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.27, No.3, 2016.
  13. Chung, Yongkyun and Kim, Joong-Ryul, "Is Artificial Intelligence(AI) Lecturer Acceptable for Adult Learners in Distance Education?: An Exploratory Study on a Cyber University South Korea.", Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.20, No.2, 2020.
  14. Cortes, Pablo, "Developing Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers on the EU : A Proposal for the Regulation of Accredited Providers", International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol.19, No.1, 2011.
  15. Cortes, Pablo and De La Rosa Fernando, "Building a Global Redress System for Low Value Cross-Border Disputes", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.62, 2013.
  16. Cortes, Pablo and Lodder, R. Arno, "Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out of Court Redress", Masstricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol.21, 2014.
  17. Dov Te'eni, "A Cognitive-affective Model of Organizational Communication for Design IT", MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, 2001.
  18. Franklin James, "How Much of Commonsense and Legal Reasoning Is Formalizable?" Review of Conceptual Obstacles, Law, Probability and Risk, Vol.11. 2012.
  19. Gluck, G, "Great Expectations: Meeting the Challenge of a New Arbitration Paradigm", American Review of International Arbitration, Vol.23, 2012.
  20. Gomez F. Katia, "The Role of Mediation in International Commercial Disputes : Reflections on Some Technological, Ethical and Educational Challenges", Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, Oxford University Press, 2019.
  21. Ha, Hong-Youl, John, J., John, D., and Chung, Yongkyun, "Temporal Effects of Information from Social Networks on Online Behavior The Role of Cognitive and Affective Trust", Internet Research, Vol.2b6, No.1, 2016.
  22. Hausel, Hans-Georg, Brain: Warum Kunden Kaufen, Rudolf Haufe Verlag GmbH & Co, 2008.
  23. Hedeen, T, "Remodelling the Multi-door Courthouse to Fit the Forum to the Folks How Screening and Preparation will Enhance ADR", Marquette Law Review, Vol.95, No.3, 2012.
  24. Houghton Jeffrey and Elkin, Randyl, Toward a Parsimonious Model of Arbitrator Acceptability: What Matters Most in Arbitrator Selection?, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.24, No.1, 2013.
  25. Jarvenpaar, S., Tractinsky and Vitale, M. "Consumer Trust in an Internet Store", Information Technology and Management, Vol.1, 2000.
  26. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray K., and Krause, K., "First Year Students' Experiences with Technology: Are They Really Digital Natives?", Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.24, No.1, 2008.
  27. Kishi, Mariko, "Perceptions and Use of Electronic Media: Testing the Relationship between Organizational Interpretation Differences and Media Richness", Information and Management, Vol.45, 2008.
  28. Latour, Bruno, Nous N'avons Jamais ete Modernes, Editions La Decouverre, France, 1991.
  29. Latour, Bruno, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, 1999.
  30. Legg, Michael, "The Future of Dispute Resolution: Online ADR and Online Courts", Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 2017.
  31. Lodder, R. Arno and Thiessen, M. Ernst, "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution", Proceedings of the UNECE Forum on ODR, 2003.
  32. Lodder R. Arno and Zeleznikow, John, "Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three Step Model, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol.10, 2005.
  33. Lodder, R. Arno and Zeleznikow, John, "Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution", 2012.
  34. Loutocky, Pavel, "Practical Impacts of the EU Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer Redress", COFOLA 2016, 2016.
  35. Mania, Karolina, "Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice", International Comparative Jurisprudence, Vol.1, No.1, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.005
  36. Meason, E. and Smith, G., Non-lawyers in International Commercial Arbitration: Gathering Splinters on the Bench, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, Vol.12, No.1, 1991.
  37. Minsky, Marvin, The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, 1985.
  38. Morgan, Robert and Hunt, Shelby, "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing", Journal of Marketing, Vol.58. 1994.
  39. Pandit Nikita, "Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Nature of the Legal Profession and Its Regulatory Framework", University of Birmingham Working Paper, 2019.
  40. Posthuma, R. and Dworkin, J., "A Behavioral Theory of Arbitrator Acceptability", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.11, No.3, 2000.
  41. Prensky, M., "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants", On the Horizon, Vol.9, No.5, 2001.
  42. Raymond Anjanette, "Yeah But Did You See the Gorilla? Creating and Protecting an Informed Consumer in Cross-border Online Dispute Resolution", Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2014.
  43. Rule, Colin, Rogers, Vikki, and Del Duca, Louis, "Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution(ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value-High Volume Claims: OAS Developments", Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, Vol.42, No.3, 2010.
  44. Sachs, K, "Time and Money: Cost Control and Effective Case Management", in Mistelis LA and Julian D M (eds), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International Hague, 2006.
  45. Shackleford, Scott and Raymond, Anjanette, "Building the Virtual Courthouse: Ethical Considerations for Design, Implementation, and Regulation in the World of ODR", Wisconsin Law Review, Vol.2014, 2014.
  46. Sourdin, Tania, "Judge v Robot? Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision Making", University of New South Wales Law Review, Vol.41, 2018.
  47. Tan, Vivi, "Online Dispute Resolution for Small Civil Claims in Victoria: A New Paradigm in Civil Justice", Deakin Law Review, Vol.24, 2019.
  48. Yin, Robert, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition, Sage Publications, Inc, 2003.
  49. Zeleznikow, John, "Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution Enhance Efficiency and Effectiveness in Courts", International Journal for Court Administration, Vol.8, No.2, 2017.