Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Current State of Foreign Transition to Open Access Journal Publishing in the Field of HSS

해외 인문사회과학 학술지 오픈액세스 전환 동향 연구

  • 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 정경희 (한성대학교 디지털인문정보학트랙)
  • Received : 2020.08.27
  • Accepted : 2020.09.07
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed recent cases of transition to open access(OA) journals in humanities and social sciences(HSS) in foreign countries to find a way to transition to OA journals in Korea. Ling OA and UP led by researchers, OLH and KU led by libraries, S2O led by publishers and L+F model led by funders and libraries were analyzed. Programs by national funding agencies such as the Norwegian Research Council, Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Austrian Science Fund, and Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences were also reviewed. Based on the results of the analyses, this study suggests for transition in Korean HSS field as follows; 1) transitions to open access journals in HSS should be supported at national level 2) the stakeholder in scholarly communications such as the nation, universities, libraries, research funders, scholarly societies etc has their own role in the transition but funders and libraries are the most important in financial support for open access publishing 3) but the financial support for the first stage of the transition should be done at national level 4) and open access journal publishing consortium comprised of libraries and information service institutions in the public sector such as KERIS, KISTI and the national library should be established 5) non commercial publishing platforms for scholarly societies should be developed and distributed.

본 논문은 국내 인문사회과학 학술지의 오픈액세스 전환 방안을 모색하기 위하여 최근 해외에서 전개되고 있는 오픈액세스 학술지 전환 사례를 분석하였다. 연구자가 주도한 Ling OA와 UP, 도서관이 주도한 OLH와 KU, 출판사가 주도한 S2O모델, 기금기관과 도서관이 협력하는 L+F모델 사례를 분석하고 국가지원 사업 사례로서 노르웨이 연구위원회와 교육연구부, 캐나다 인문사회과학연구위원회, 오스트리아 과학재단, 스위스 인문사회과학 아카데미의 프로그램을 분석하였다. 분석결과를 기반으로 국내 인문사회과학 학술지의 오픈액세스 전환을 위하여 다음을 제안하였다. 1) 오픈액세스 출판전환 지원이 국가적인 차원에서 진행되어야 하며, 2) 국가, 대학, 도서관, 학회 등 학술커뮤니케이션 모든 주체가 참여하되 오픈액세스 출판비용 부담의 핵심주체는 연구기금지원기관과 도서관이어야 하며, 3) 초기 단계에서는 국가차원의 비용지원이 이루어져야하며, 4) 오픈액세스 학술지 구독을 위한 대학도서관 협의체 및 국가정보서비스 기관들이 참여하는 컨소시엄이 구성되어야 하며, 5) 비영리 출판유통 플랫폼이 개발 및 보급되어야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Gyuhwan, & Joung, Kyoung Hee (2017). A study on the characteristics of open access in Korean scholarly journals: Focused on KCI journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.251
  2. Shin, Eun-Ja (2016). A study on flipping subscription journals to open access. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.035
  3. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2019). 2019 Global Trends on Scholarly Information. vol. 7. Daegu, Korea: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  4. Bjork, B. (2017). Growth of hybrid open access, 2009-2016. PeerJ 5:e3878. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3878
  5. Bjork, B., & Korkeamaki, T. (2020). Adoption of the open access business model in scientific journal publishing: A cross-disciplinary study. arXiv:2005.01008. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01008
  6. Bjork, B., & Solomon, D. (2014). Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. London: Jisc, Research Libraries UK, Research Councils UK, the Wellcome Trust, the Austrian Science Fund, the Luxembourg National Research Fund, and the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp055910.pdf
  7. Brainard, J. (2019.9.16). New deals could help scientific societies survive open access. Science Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/09/new-deals-could-help-scientific-societies-survive-open-access
  8. Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2020). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 181-185. http://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262
  9. Earney, L. (2018). Open access briefing paper: Considering the implications of the finch report. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/10/22/open-access-briefing-paper-considering-the-implications-of-the-finch-report/
  10. Edwards, C. (2016). Building a non-APC business model for humanities journal publishing. Retrieved from https://oaspa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Caroline-Edwards-Talk-Virginia-Sept.-2016.pdf
  11. Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Eve, M. P. (2018). How learned societies could flip to open access, with no author-facing charges, using a consortial model. Retrieved from https://eve.gd/2018/01/21/how-learned-societies-could-flip-to-oa-using-a-consortial-model/
  13. Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2013). The diamond model of open access publishing: Why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious. tripleC, 13(2), 428-443. Retrieved from https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/502 https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v13i2.670
  14. Giglia, E. (2019). OPERAS: Bringing the long tail of social sciences and humanities into open science. JLIS.it, 10(1), 140-156. http://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12523
  15. Hook, D., Calvert, I., & Hahnel, M. (2019). The ascent of open access: An analysis of the open access landscape since the turn of the millennium. London: Digital Science. Retrieved from https://www.digital-science.com/blog/news/the-ascent-of-open-access-report/
  16. HSS Publishers (2019.1.25). An HSS perspective on Plan S. Retrieved from https://plansinhss.home.blog/
  17. Immenhauser, B. (2019). Funding of platinum open access journals in the social sciences and humanities. Poster for Swiss Open Science Action Plan: Kick-Off Forum, October 17 2019, EPFL. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3450380
  18. Knowledge Unlatched (2019). Berghahn Open Anthro: Berghahn pilots new open access model in anthropology. Retrieved from https://knowledgeunlatched.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/At-a-glance-Berghahn-Open-Anthro-English-2.pdf
  19. Kozak, M., & Hartley, J. (2013). Publication fees for OA journals: Different disciplines-different methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 2591-2594. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22972
  20. LingOA Homepage. Retrieved from https://www.lingoa.eu/
  21. Matthias, L., Jahn, N., & Laakso, M. (2019). The two-way street of open access journal publishing: Flip it and reverse it. Publications, 7(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020023
  22. Michael, A. (2019). Subscribe To Open: Annual Reviews' take on open access. Posted on The Scholarly Kitchen (APR 2, 2019). Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/04/02/subscribe-to-open/
  23. Morrison, H. (2018). DOAJ APC information as of Jan 31, 2018. Retrieved from https://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/2018/02/06/doaj-apc-information-as-of-jan-31-2018/
  24. Morrison, H., Salhab, J., Calve-Genest, A., & Horava, T. (2015). Open access article processing charges: DOAJ survey May 2014. Publications, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3010001
  25. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2017). The Humanities in Norway: Meld. St. 25 (2016-2017) Report to the Storting (white paper). Retrieved from https://www.openaccess.no/english/humanities-norway.pdf
  26. NSR Editorial (2020). Knowledge Unlatched renews two successful open access collections, ensuring sustainability of open research worldwide. Retrieved from http://www.noshelfrequired.com/knowledge-unlatched-renews-two-successful-open-access-collections-ensuring-sustainability-of-open-research-worldwide/
  27. Open Library of Humanities Homepage (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.openlibhums.org
  28. Open Library of Humanities Supporting Institutions (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.openlibhums.org/plugins/supporters/
  29. Openaccess.no (2019). Norwegian open journals in the social sciences and humanities: A consortium for Norwegian SSH OA journals. Retrieved from https://www.openaccess.no/english/humsam/
  30. OPERAS Open Access Business Models WG (2018). Retrieved from https://operas.hypotheses.org/aboutoperas/working-groups/business-models-wg
  31. Paxson, H. (2019). Q&A: Heather Paxson on a new model for open-access publishing in anthropology. MIT News (May 10, 2019). Retrieved from http://news.mit.edu/2019/mit-heather-paxson-open-access-model-workshop-0510
  32. Reckling, F., Rieck, K., & Scherag, E. (2018). Report on the FWF Open Access Journal Funding Initiative. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1433993
  33. Rooryck, J., de Vries, S., & Eve, M. P. (2015). Open access models for the humanities and the social sciences. Retrieved from http://www.lingoa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/LingOA-model-LERU.pdf
  34. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (2018). Aid to scholarly journals. Retrieved from https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/scholarly_journals-revues_savantes-eng.aspx
  35. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (2019). Aid to scholarly journals selection committees: June 2018 competition. Retrieved from https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/merit_review-evaluation_du_merite/selection_committees-comites_selection/journals-revues_2018-eng.aspx
  36. Solomon, D., Laakso, M., & Bjork, B. (2016). Converting scholarly journals to open access: A review of approaches and experiences. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27803834
  37. Speicher, L., Armando, L., Bargheer, M., Eve, M. P., Fund, S., Leao, D., Mosterd, M., Pinter, F., & Souyioultzoglou, I. (2018). OPERAS open access business models white paper. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1323707
  38. University of California OSC (2019). Guide to transitioning journals to open access publishing. Retrieved from https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/UC-OSC-Guide-to-Transitioning-Journals-to-OA.pdf
  39. Vega, P. C. (2019). The National Library of the Netherlands joins OLH LPS model. Retrieved from https://www.openlibhums.org/news/353/
  40. Willinsky, J. (2019). If, alongside libraries, funders pulled their weight: A study in universal open access. ELPUB 2019 23rd edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Jun 2019, Marseille, France. Retrieved from https://elpub.episciences.org/5561/pdf
  41. Willinsky, J., & Rusk, M. (2019). If research libraries and funders finance open access: Moving beyond subscriptions and APCs. College & Research Libraries, 80(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.3.340
  42. Wise, A., & Estelle, L. (2019a). How libraries can support society publishers to accelerate their transition to full and immediate OA and Plan S. Insights, 32(1), 23. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.477
  43. Wise, A., & Estelle, L. (2019b). Society publishers accelerating open access and Plan S (SPA-OPS) project. Wellcome Trust. Collection. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4561397.v2
  44. Wise, A., & Estelle, L. (2020). How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S. Learned Publishing, 33(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1272