DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

토픽모델링을 활용한 학교도서관 연구동향 분석

A Study on the School Library Research Trends Using Topic Modeling

  • 정영주 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과) ;
  • 김혜진 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.20
  • 심사 : 2020.09.08
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30

초록

본 연구는 학교도서관의 연구동향을 살펴보기 위해 토픽모델링을 적용하였다. 분석 대상은 4대 문헌정보학회지 한국도서관·정보학회지, 한국문헌정보학회지, 한국비블리아학회지, 정보관리학회지의 1990년부터 2020년 7월까지 학교도서관 관련 논문 498편이다. 연구 결과 토픽모델링을 통한 주제는 27개의 토픽으로 8개의 영역 일반, 제도·체제, 건물·설비, 운영·경영, 자료조직, 서비스, 교육, 기타로 묶어 정리하였고, 하위단계 주제는 22개로 나누었다. 텍스트 정제와 토픽모델링 분석은 넷마이너(NetMiner) V.4를 사용하여 수행하였고 토픽모델링을 위한 토픽 개수의 결정을 위해 로그우드 추정치를 사용하였다. 연구 결과 27개 토픽의 주제에 제목을 부여하였고 제일 많은 연구가 이루어진 토픽은 도서관 활용수업(T27)이 35편, 정보활용(T2)에 관한 연구가 30편이고, 20편 이상의 연구는 평가지표개발(T13), 학교 사서교사 배치(T24), 학습정보 매체 활용(T3), 지역사회·공공도서관(T7), 도서관 협력(T9), 도서관 이용(T17), 도서관 연구(T11), 독서교육(T4), 장서개발(T5), 교육효과·교육방법(T18)이 있었다.

This study aimed to analyze the research trends of school libraries from 1990 to July 2020. To this end, LDA topic modeling analysis was conducted to the domestic article abstracts related to school libraries. The total number of documents is 498 papers published by the four major domestic journals in Library and Information Science. The log-likelihood estimate criterion was used to determine the number of topics for topic modeling. As a result of the study, 27 topics were discovered, then, theory were categorized by eight subject areas: general, institutional system, building/equipment, operation/management, data organization, service, education, and others. The most popular research was library utilization classes (T27) and Information Utilization (T2). More than 20 studies were found in each evaluation index development (T13), school librarian placement (T24), learning information media utilization (T3), community public library (T7), library cooperation (T9), library use (T17), library research (T11), reading education (T4), collection development (T5), and education effects/teaching methods (T18).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, Bora and Heesop Kim. 2017. "An Analysis of the Digital Library Research Trends in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3): 49-66. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.049
  2. Kim, Sohee and Hye-Ran Suh. 2017. "An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Reading Programs in School Libraries." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4): 363-392. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.363
  3. Kim, Jong-Sung. 2013. "Trends Analysis of School Library Research in Korea." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(2): 71-91. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.071
  4. Kim, Heesop and Bora Kang. 2019. "Analysis of Research Topics among Library, Archives and Museums using Topic Modeling." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4): 339-358. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.4.201912.339
  5. Park, Ja-Hyun and Min Song. 2013. "A Study on the Research Trends in Library & Information Science in Korea Using Topic Modeling." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1): 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  6. Park, Jong Do. 2019. "A Study on Issue Tracking on Multi-cultural Studies Using Topic Modeling." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(3): 273-289. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.273
  7. Sohn, Jung-Pyo. 2003. "An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Library and Information Science in Korea: 1957-2002." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(3): 9-21.
  8. Song, Ki-ho. 2012. Actual Operation of School Library. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  9. Oh, Se Hoon. 2005. "A Study on the Research Trends of Library & Information Science in Korea by Analyzing Journal Articles and the Cited Literatures." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3): 379-408. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.379
  10. Oh, Cheol Ho. 2009. "Evaluation reserch on information: An empirical review." Informatization Policy, 16(4): 3-26.
  11. Yoo, Sarah. 2017. "A Diagnostic Study of Research Trends of School Library and Teaching Librarian." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4): 181-201. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.181
  12. Lee, Keehoen, Hyojung Jung, and Min Song. 2015. "Weighted Subject - Method Network Analysis of Library and Information Science Studies." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(3): 457-488. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.457
  13. Lee, Myeong Hee. 2002. "Recent Trends in Research Methods in Library and Information Science." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(3): 287-310. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.3.287
  14. Lee, Seong Sin. 2016. "Study on the Library Marketing Research Trends through Keyword Network Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Korea and Other Countries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(3): 383-402. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.383
  15. Lee, Soo-Sang. 2010. "Preliminary Study on the Co-author Network Analysis of Korean Library Information Science Research Community." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2): 297-315. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.297
  16. Lee, Soo-Sang. 2016. "A Study on the Application of Topic Modeling for the Book Report Text." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.1
  17. Lee, Jae Yun. 2020. "Analyzing the Intellectual Structure of School Library Researches with Citation-Weighted Author Profiling." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2): 197-223. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.197
  18. Lee, Jong Wook and Hye Rin Bak. 2016. "Characteristics of Korean Researchers through Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published in International LIS Journals." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1): 217-242. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.217
  19. Lee, Hye Kyung, Kiduk Yang, and Seon Wook Kim. 2019. "Analysis of Collaborative Research Trends in Library and Information Science in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(2): 191-214. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.2.201906.191
  20. Jeong, Yoo Kyung. 2020. "An Analysis on Research Trends of Digital Humanities." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(2): 311-331. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.311
  21. Cho, Jane. 2011. "A Study for Research Area of Library and Information Science by Network Text Analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4): 65-83. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065
  22. School Library Promotion Act. 2018. Law No. 15368.
  23. Blei, David M. 2012. "Probabilistic Topic Models." Communications of the ACM, 55(4): 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  24. Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. "Latent Dirichlet Allocation." Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3: 993-1022.
  25. Davarpanah, M. and S. Aslekia. 2008. "A Scientometric Analysis of International LIS Journals: Productivity and Characteristics." Scientometric, 77(1): 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z
  26. Griffiths, T. and M. Steyvers. 2004. "Finding Scientific Topics." PNAS, 1(101): 5228-5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101
  27. IFLA. 2015. IFLA School Library Guidelines. Den Haag, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.

피인용 문헌

  1. 기업 아카이브에 관한 연구 동향 분석: 토픽모델링 분석을 중심으로 vol.21, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2021.21.3.163