DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Social Participation Attitude, Social Support, and Empowerment on Ageism Experience in the Elderly Using Welfare Centers

노인복지관을 이용하는 노인의 사회참여 태도, 사회적 지지, 역량이 노인차별경험에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2020.04.16
  • Accepted : 2020.08.10
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the factors affecting the discrimination of the elderly using welfare centers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 217 elderly people from a welfare center in D city. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire survey consisting of ageism experience, social participation attitude, social support, and empowerment. For data analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multiple regression were performed using SPSS/WIN 21.0 program. Results: As a result of analyzing the correlations among the variables, the discrimination experience of the elderly showed negative correlations in social participation attitude and child relationship support. The factors affecting the discrimination experience of the elderly include gender, job, smartphone use, and child relationship support had a significant effect. The explanatory power of the discrimination experience of these factors was 15.4%. Conclusion: This study found that gender, job, social support, and smartphone use were factors influencing the discrimination experience of the elderly. It is hoped that public relations and policy measures should be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Butler RN. Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(4_part_1):243-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243
  2. You SM. A study on major determinants of the ageism [master's thesis]. [Seoul]: Soongsil University; 2016. 67 p.
  3. Won YH. Experiences of elderly discriminations and psychological well-being of the elderly. Social Welfare Policy. 2005;21(0):319-339.
  4. Yang JN, Eun J, Lee MH, Kim Y, Kim NH. A study on the relationship between perceived discrimination of the elderly and suicidal ideation: Focused on the moderating effect of social support. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare. 2018; 73(3):215-239. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw.73.3.201809.215
  5. Havighurst RJ. Personality and patterns of aging. The Gerontologist. 1968;8(1_Part_2):20-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/8.1_Part_2.20
  6. Ju KH. Activity level of social participation and quality of life among the elderly in Korea: Focusing on gender and age differences. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies. 2011;42(2):5-39. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2011.42.2.5
  7. Kwon JD, Son ES. The influences of self-perception and experiences of age discrimination upon the social participation among the elderly: A mediating effect of self-efficacy. Korean Society of Gerontological Social Welfare. 2010;49(0):81-105.
  8. Shin HG. Effects of the elderly's ageism experience on suicidal thought and mediating effect of hopelessness and depression. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare. 2012;56:191-216.
  9. National Information Society Agency Korea. 2019 National information white paper [Internet]. Daegu: National information society agency Korea. 2019 [citerd 2020 August 26]. Available from: https://www.nia.or.kr/site/nia_kor/ex/bbs/List.do?cbIdx=44086
  10. Shin JW, Kwon JS. An evaluative study on communication enhancement program through social network service of older adults in the community. Korean Journal of Family Social Work. 2017;12(58):151-179. https://doi.org/10.16975/kjfsw.2017..58.006
  11. Kim MY. The effects of smartphone use on life satisfaction, depression, social activity and social support of older adults. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2018;19(11):264-277. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.11.264
  12. Kwon JD, Son ES, Kim KS. A study on the effectiveness evaluation of the community's elderly capacity building and elderly awareness improvement support projects: 2006 Theme Planning Project. Community Chest of Korea: Korea Association of Senior Welfare Centers; 2009. 139 p.
  13. Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML. Measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services. 1997;48(8):1042-1047. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.48.8.1042
  14. Palmore E. The ageism survey: First findings. The Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):572-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572
  15. Lee YM, Kim RH, Kim SB, Lee CR, Lee HJ, Heo SW. Effects of functional status and ageism experience on successful ageing of elderly in a city. Journal of the Korean Society for Multicultural Health. 2018;8(2):31-40.
  16. Mangen DJ, Peterson WA. Research instruments in social gerontology: Clinical and social psychology. Journal of Gerontology. 1983;38(3):375-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/38.3.375a
  17. Choi KI. A study on the social participation of the elderly: Focused on Wonju [master's thesis]. [Wonju]: Sangji University; 2007. 55 p.
  18. Barrera M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1986;14(4):413-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922627
  19. Min KC, Lee JH. Effects of providing support to informal social network on mental health of the elderly: Focused on gender difference. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2008; 28(3):515-533.
  20. Kim W. An exploratory study on ageism experienced by the elderly and its related factors. Journal of the Korea Geronotological Society. 2003;23(2):21-35.
  21. Koo HY. A study on factors influencing recognition of the aged about the ageism. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare. 2017;72(4):141-165. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw.72.4.201712.141
  22. Woo KH, Ju KH, Lee YS. A qualitative study on the older worker's experience of ageism in employment. Social Welfare Policy. 2012;39(4):281-304. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2012.39.4.281
  23. Um SR, Choi EY, Cho SE, Choi IJ, Kim YS. The effects of smartphone use on structured social network types among retired older adults in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2018;38(3):481-499. https://doi.org/10.31888/JKGS.2018.38.3.481
  24. Yang JN, Choi EJ, Kim HS, Sim JY. A study of elders experience on ageism in urban and rural areas in Korea - Focused on social support and quality of life. Journal of Community Welfare. 2010;34:207-229.
  25. Lengrand L. Mini-study 7: Innovation in an age-integrated society. [Internet]. Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies. 2009 [cited 2019 October 20]. Avilable from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.462.2304&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  26. Chung SD, Chung SM, Lee MW. Parent-child interaction, social interaction and age-friendly environment on age heterogeneity: An age specific group comparison. Health and Social Welfare. 2017;37(3):5-35. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2017.37.3.5
  27. Prandini R. Family relations as social capital. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2014;45(2):221-234. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.45.2.221
  28. Cheng ST, Chan AC. Relationship with others and life satisfaction in later life: Do gender and widowhood make a difference?. The Journals of Gerontology. 2006;61(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.P46
  29. Seo KW. A study of space design of old people's community center for the promotion of intergenerational exchange [master's thesis]. [Seoul]: Soonsil University; 2008. 164 p.