DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Responses of Low-Quality Soil Microbial Community Structure and Activities to Application of a Mixed Material of Humic Acid, Biochar, and Super Absorbent Polymer

  • Li, Fangze (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology) ;
  • Men, Shuhui (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Shiwei (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Huang, Juan (Shenzhen Techand Ecology and Environment Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Puyang, Xuehua (Shenzhen Techand Ecology and Environment Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Wu, Zhenqing (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology) ;
  • Huang, Zhanbin (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology)
  • Received : 2020.03.24
  • Accepted : 2020.05.21
  • Published : 2020.09.28

Abstract

Low-quality soil for land reuse is a crucial problem in vegetation quality and especially to waste disposal sites in mining areas. It is necessary to find suitable materials to improve the soil quality and especially to increase soil microbial diversity and activity. In this study, pot experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of a mixed material of humic acid, super absorbent polymer and biochar on low-quality soil indexes and the microbial community response. The indexes included soil physicochemical properties and the corresponding plant growth. The results showed that the mixed material could improve chemical properties and physical structure of soil by increasing the bulk density, porosity, macro aggregate, and promote the mineralization of nutrient elements in soil. The best performance was achieved by adding 3 g·kg-1 super absorbent polymer, 3 g·kg-1 humic acid, and 10 g·kg-1 biochar to soil with plant total nitrogen, dry weight and height increased by 85.18%, 266.41% and 74.06%, respectively. Physicochemical properties caused changes in soil microbial diversity. Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, and Proteobacteria were significantly positively correlated with most of the physical, chemical and plant indicators. Actinobacteria and Armatimonadetes were significantly negatively correlated with most measurement factors. Therefore, this study can contribute to improving the understanding of low-quality soil and how it affects soil microbial functions and sustainability.

References

  1. Feng Y, Wang J, Bai Z, Reading L. 2019. Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: a review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 191: 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.015
  2. Bao N, Wu L, Ye B, Yang K, Zhou W. 2017. Assessing soil organic matter of reclaimed soil from a large surface coal mine using a field spectroradiometer in laboratory. Geoderma 288: 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.033
  3. Guo A, Zhao Z, Zhang P, Yang Q, Li Y, Wang G. 2019. Linkage between soil nutrient and microbial characteristic in an opencast mine, China. Sci. Total Environ. 671: 905-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.065
  4. Liu X, Bai Z, Zhou W, Cao Y, Zhang G. 2017. Changes in soil properties in the soil profile after mining and reclamation in an opencast coal mine on the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol. Eng. 98: 228-239.
  5. Maji D, Misra P, Singh S, Kalra A. 2017. Humic acid rich vermicompost promotes plant growth by improving microbial community structure of soil as well as root nodulation and mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of Pisum sativum. Appl. Soil Ecol. 110: 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.008
  6. Cao Y, Wang B, Guo H, Xiao H, Wei T. 2017. The effect of super absorbent polymers on soil and water conservation on the terraces of the loess plateau. Ecol. Een. 102: 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.043
  7. Fernando TN, Ariadurai SA, Disanayaka CK, Kulathunge S, Aruggoda AGB. 2017. Development of radiation grafted super absorbent polymers for agricultural applications. Energy Procedia 127: 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.106
  8. Yang L, Yang Y, Chen Z, Guo C, Li S. 2014. Influence of super absorbent polymer on soil water retention, seed germination and plant survivals for rocky slopes eco-engineering. Ecol. Eng. 62: 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.019
  9. Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, et al. 2013. Biochar's effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditionsa meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil 373: 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x
  10. Cao X, Ma L, Gao B. 2009. Dairy-Manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 3285-3291. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803092k
  11. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota - a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43: 1812-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
  12. Zhu X, Chen B, Zhu L, Xing B. 2017. Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: a review. Environ. Pollut. 227: 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032
  13. Akmal M, Maqbool Z, Khan KS, Hussain Q, Ijaz SS, Iqbal M, et al. 2019. Integrated use of biochar and compost to improve soil microbial activity, nutrient availability, and plant growth in arid soil. Arab. J. Geosci. 12: 232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4414-0
  14. Madhavi P, Sailaja V, Ram PT, Hussain SA. 2015. Effect of fertilizers, biochar and humic acid on soil enzymes at ferment stages. Int. J. Curr. Res. 12: 23871-23875
  15. Gregorutti VC, Caviglia OP. 2019. Impact of crop aerial and root biomass inputs on soil nitrifiers and cellulolytic microorganisms. Soil Till. Res. 191: 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.018
  16. Dubey RK, Dubey PK, Abhilash PC. 2019. Sustainable soil amendments for improving the soil quality, yield and nutrient content of Brassica juncea (L.) grown in different agroecological zones of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Soil Till. Res. 195: 104418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104418
  17. Menon RR, Kumari S, Kumar P, Verma A, Krishnamurthi S, Rameshkumar N. 2019. Sphingomonas pokkalii sp. nov., a novel plant associated rhizobacterium isolated from a saline tolerant pokkali rice and its draft genome analysis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 42: 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.02.003
  18. Zhou L, Monreal CM, Xu S, McLaughlin NB, Zhang H, Hao G, et al. 2019. Effect of bentonite-humic acid application on the improvement of soil structure and maize yield in a sandy soil of a semi-arid region. Geoderma 338: 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.014
  19. Pukalchik M, Mercl F, Terekhova V, Tlustos P. 2018. Biochar, wood ash and humic substances mitigating trace elements stress in contaminated sandy loam soil: evidence from an integrative approach. Chemosphere 203: 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.181
  20. Fan R, Luo J, Yan S, Zhou Y, Zhang Z. 2015. Effects of biochar and super absorbent polymer on substrate properties and water spinach growth. Pedosphere 25: 737-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30055-2
  21. Xu S, Wang B, Li Y, Jiang D, Zhou Y, Ding A, et al. 2020. Ubiquity, diversity, and activity of comammox Nitrospira in agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 706: 135684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135684
  22. Plante AF, Conant RT, Stewart CE, Paustian K, Six J. 2006. Impact of soil texture on the distribution of soil organic matter in physical and chemical fractions. Soil. Sci. Soc. AM. J. 70: 287-296. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0363
  23. Gasmi I, Aljoumani B, Sànchez-Espigares JA, Mechergui M, Moussa M. 2019. A linear mixed effect (LME) model for soil nutrients and soil salinity changes based on two localized irrigation techniques (drip irrigation and buried diffuser). Arab. J. Geosci. 12: 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4400-6
  24. Guo A, Zhao Z, Zhang P, Yang Q, Li Y, Wang G. 2019. Linkage between soil nutrient and microbial characteristic in an opencast mine, China. Sci. Total Environ. 671: 905-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.065
  25. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241: 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
  26. Tian L, Zhao L, Wu X, Hu G, Fang H, Zhao Y, et al. 2019. Variations in soil nutrient availability across Tibetan grassland from the 1980s to 2010s. Geoderma 338: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.009
  27. Prakash K, Sridharan A, Thejas HK, Swaroop HM. 2012. A simplified approach of determining the specific gravity of soil solids. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 30: 1063-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9521-6
  28. Holthusen D, Brandt AA, Reichert JM, Horn R. 2018. Soil porosity, permeability and static and dynamic strength parameters under native forest/grassland compared to no-tillage cropping. Soil Till. Res. 177: 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.12.003
  29. Neves CSVJ, Feller C, Guimarães MF, Medina CC, Tavares Filho J, Fortier M. 2003. Soil bulk density and porosity of homogeneous morphological units identified by the cropping profile method in clayey oxisols in Brazil. Soil Till. Res. 71: 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00023-0
  30. Amato KR, Yeoman CJ, Kent A, Righini N, Carbonero F, Estrada A, et al. 2013.Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes. ISME J. 7: 1344-1353. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.16
  31. Mori H, Maruyama F, Kato H, Toyoda A, Dozono A, Ohtsubo Y, et al. 2014. Design and experimental application of a novel non-degenerate universal primer set that amplifies prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes with a low possibility to amplify eukaryotic rRNA genes. DNA Res. 21: 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst052
  32. Jorge LC. Cantero M. 2003. Soil bulk density and penetration resistance under different tillage and crop management systems and their relationship with barley root growth. Agron. J. 95: 526-536. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5260
  33. Dahal B, NandaKafle G, Perkins L, Brozel VS. 2017. Diversity of free-Living nitrogen fixing Streptomyces in soils of the badlands of South Dakota. Microbiol. Res. 195: 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2016.11.004
  34. Joshi V, Suyal A, Srivastava A, Srivastava PC. 2019. Role of organic amendments in reducing leaching of sulfosulfuron through wheat crop cultivated soil. Emerg. Contam. 5: 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2018.12.002
  35. Coy RM, Held DW, Kloepper JW. 2019. Rhizobacterial colonization of bermudagrass by Bacillus spp. in a Marvyn loamy sand soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 141: 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.018
  36. DeMing J, ChengYou C, Ying Z, ZhenBo C, XiaoShu H. 2014. Plantations of native shrub species restore soil microbial diversity in the Horqin Sandy Land, northeastern China. J. Arid. Land 6: 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0205-8
  37. Volikov AB, Kholodov VA, Kulikova NA, Philippova OI, Ponomarenko SA, Lasareva EV, et al. 2016 Silanized humic substances act as hydrophobic modifiers of soil separates inducing formation of water-stable aggregates in soils. CATENA 137: 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.09.022
  38. Janus A, Pelfrene A, Heymans S, Deboffe C, Douay F, Waterlot C. 2015. Elaboration, characteristics and advantages of biochars for the management of contaminated soils with a specific overview on Miscanthus biochars. J Environ. Manage. 162: 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.056
  39. Riyazi S, Kevern JT, Mulheron M. 2017. Super absorbent polymers (SAPs) as physical air entrainment in cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 147: 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.001
  40. Ciarkowska K, Solek-Podwika K, Filipek-Mazur B, Tabak M. 2017. Comparative effects of lignite-derived humic acids and FYM on soil properties and vegetable yield. Geoderma 303: 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.022
  41. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL. 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158: 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.013
  42. Zhang J, Wei Y, Liu J, Yuan J, Liang Y, Ren J, et al. 2019. Effects of maize straw and its biochar application on organic and humic carbon in water-stable aggregates of a Mollisol in Northeast China: a five-year field experiment. Soil Till. Res. 190: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.02.014
  43. Huang W, Liu Z, Zhou C, Yang X. 2020. Enhancement of soil ecological self-repair using a polymer composite material. CATENA 188: 104443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104443
  44. Li Z, Rui Z, Zhang D, Feng X, Lu H, Shen S, et al. 2019. Macroaggregates as biochemically functional hotspots in soil matrix: evidence from a rice paddy under long-term fertilization treatments in the Taihu Lake Plain, eastern China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 138: 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.01.013
  45. Bai Y, Wu J, Clark CM, Naeem S, Pan Q, Huang J, et al. 2010. Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands. Global Change Biol. 16: 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01950.x
  46. Mack MC, Schuur EAG, Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Chapin FS. 2004. Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431: 440-443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02887
  47. Chen J, Gong J, Xu M. 2020. Implications of continuous and rotational cropping practices on soil bacterial communities in pineapple cultivation. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 97: 103172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103172
  48. Chen C, Zhang J, Lu M, Qin C, Chen Y, Yang L, et al. 2016. Microbial communities of an arable soil treated for 8 years with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Biol. Fert. Soils 52: 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1089-5
  49. Soman C, Li D, Wander MM, Kent AD. 2017. Long-term fertilizer and crop-rotation treatments differentially affect soil bacterial community structure. Plant Soil 413: 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3083-y
  50. Hu J, Wu J, Qu X, Li J. 2018. Effects of organic wastes on structural characterizations of humic acid in semiarid soil under plastic mulched drip irrigation. Chemosphere 200: 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.128
  51. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota - a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43: 1812-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
  52. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, Sachdeva V, Deng H. 2015. Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 206: 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.015
  53. Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Devonshire BJ, Brookes PC. 2013. Microbial biomass growth, following incorporation of biochars produced at $350^{\circ}C$ or $700^{\circ}C$, in a silty-clay loam soil of high and low pH. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57: 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.033
  54. Zhang Q, Shamsi IH, Xu D, Wang G, Lin X, Jilani G, et al. 2012. Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Appl. Soil Ecol. 57: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.012
  55. Zhang L, Jing Y, Xiang Y, Zhang R, Lu H. 2018. Responses of soil microbial community structure changes and activities to biochar addition: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 643: 926-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.231
  56. Wu FZ, Bao WK, Zhou ZQ, Wu N. 2009. Carbon accumulation, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings in response to nitrogen supply and water stress. J. Arid. Environ. 73: 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.007
  57. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Canellas NOA, Mazzei P, Piccolo A. 2019. Humic acids increase the maize seedlings exudation yield.Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 6: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-018-0139-7
  58. Puglisi E, Pascazio S, Suciu N, Cattani I, Fait G, Spaccini R, et al. 2013. Rhizosphere microbial diversity as influenced by humic substance amendments and chemical composition of rhizodeposits. J. Geochem. Explor. 129: 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.006
  59. Nelissen V, Rutting T, Huygens D, Staelens J, Ruysschaert G, Boeckx P. 2012. Maize biochars accelerate short-term soil nitrogen dynamics in a loamy sand soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 55: 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.019
  60. Tian J, Wang J, Dippold M, Gao Y, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. 2016. Biochar affects soil organic matter cycling and microbial functions but does not alter microbial community structure in a paddy soil. Sci Total Environ. 556: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.010